Intelex vs. Onspring

I would caution colleagues to make sure the system does what they need it to do and get it all in writing.

Incentivized

As an financial and consulting working professional we had many challenges related to being compliant with other financial and governmental regulations and standard. For that we need so many different process, business units and other interested parties to come on same table and work on every single control to get compliant with those regulations. In this case we have manage so many risks and work on timely remediation. Onspring worked well in this.

Incentivized

• Report and dashboard
• Supplier audit
• Non conformity
• Approved vendor list
• Audit cycle

Incentivized

• Findings
• Reporting
• Exceptions
• Policies
• Standard

Incentivized

• Implementation process is very difficult unless you are using the product out of the box
• Licensing model is frustrating but they are willing to be flexible to make things work

Incentivized

• Integration with other tools
• Risk Register management
• Asset and Process Management

Incentivized

We just upgrade the document control application from V5 to V6. There are still quite a bit of issues left unresolved.

Incentivized

We felt Intelex was more user friendly and provided the services we were seeking in a system. We evaluated all applications vs. our company needs and wants.

Incentivized

RSA Archer is also great tool but why I choose Onspring is because it is user friendly and easy UI on the other hand Archer is so lethal and complex system which sometimes lack behind in term performance and scalability.

Incentivized

• Postive
• Improved process efficiency and

Incentivized

• Positive - Risk Management
• Positive - Findings Management
• Negative - Integration issue with some of tools

Incentivized