Interana vs. UXCam Product Analytics

Interana is best suited for companies with large customer bases and many data points. Behavioural modeling is key and if you need any type of insight this tool is great for that.

Incentivized

UXCam App Analytics help identify the user pain points and improvement areas within our app. It helps observe the app from a customer's perspective and hence communication around any new updates with stakeholders get easy. These can be times when we aren't able to view the complete recordings due to delays in loading or randomisation of samples.

Incentivized

• Speed
• Large datasets
• Relatively easy to use

Incentivized

• User flow mapping. It shows how users are navigating in the app.
• App crashes
• User session recordings
• Segmentation on devices, OS versions, processors etc

Incentivized

• More citizen development tools
• More vendor provided training through self-serve portals

Incentivized

• Loading time is high due to which we have to wait a lot sometimes
• In heatmaps, more properties can be added eg. User cohort, experiment id
• Provide filters to easily check the recordings by screen and feature dropoffs

Incentivized

Interana's ability to scale is huge for our environment and does it very well. Most other tools can't keep up with the large amounts of datasets that are generated daily.

Incentivized

UXCam provided higher coverage of features than Mixpanel or Inspectlet standalone. In fact, it has the features if you combine both the products which is amazing. In a single integration I can get multiple use-cases covered.

Incentivized

• provided us with contextual analysis
• ability to map our customer journey

Incentivized

• Improved conversions and funnels
• Better user experience and NPS
• Achieving our ambitious yearly targets well before year end

Incentivized