JitBase vs. SAP Digital Manufacturing

It is well suited for a standard workstation where orders need to be displayed and where feedback is provided either manually or by the machine.Special use cases, such as generating serial numbers for consistent component identification, require a fair amount of in-house development. Another drawback is that some scenarios supported in SAP PP cannot be mapped using DM

• Automation using triggers and PPDs
• Shopfloor tracking using asset managements
• Low Code No Code dev style for POD interface development
• Intuitive dashboards using SAC

Incentivized

• Edge component - this needs to be improved to provide a seamless connection.
• The inbuilt functionalities like in ME instead of building separate production process.
• The EDHR reports needs to be similar in SAP ME.
• Configurable OEE reports and history reports delivered out of the box.
• Integrated with non - SAP ERP.

Incentivized

The feedback from our end users has been overwhelmingly positive, indicating strong adoption and satisfaction with the solution. This demonstrates that the system meets most functional expectations and supports daily operations effectively. However, performance remains an area for improvement. Addressing this will further enhance user experience and ensure the solution scales efficiently for future growth.

Incentivized

I have used and worked on SAP ME/MII. This product(SAP DM) is far better in every way than the older sibling - ME/MII. This is completely cloud based solution which removes the hinderances of procuring and managing an on-prem solution. And as this is a cloud based solution, it also enables a very smooth scalability of the deployment across various plants

Incentivized

• As it is cloud based product, quarterly upgrades impacts the production and needs effort and resources for testing
• Product is not fully matured. It still has bugs

Incentivized