TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Jobber

    Score8.6 out of 10
    N/AJobber is field service management software from the company of the same name in Edmonton, Alberta.

    $39

    per month 1 user

    ThreatConnect Risk Quantifier™ (RQ)

    Score7.3 out of 10
    N/ARisk Quantifier (RQ) translates cyber risk into clear financial terms, allowing security leaders to prioritize defenses and communicate impact in the language of business. By mapping MITRE ATT&CK techniques and vulnerabilities to financial loss scenarios, RQ enables cost-justified security decisions. Together with TI Ops and Polarity, RQ ensures that operational efforts align to risk-based priorities — bridging the gap between threat activity and executive decision-making.N/A
    Pricing
    JobberThreatConnect Risk Quantifier™ (RQ)
    Editions & Modules
    Core
    $39
    per month 1 user
    Connect (individual)
    $119
    per month 1 user
    Connect
    $169
    per month up to 5 users
    Grow (individual)
    $199
    per month 1 user
    Grow
    $349
    per month up to 10 users
    Plus
    $599
    per month Up to 15 users
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    JobberThreatConnect Risk Quantifier™ (RQ)
    Free Trial
    YesNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoYes
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional DetailsDiscount available for annual pricing.—
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    JobberThreatConnect Risk Quantifier™ (RQ)
    Considered Both Products
    Jobber - Field Service Software
    No answer on this topic
    ThreatConnect
    No answer on this topic
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    95%
    Would buy again
    20 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Delivers good value for the price
    95%
    Delivers good value for the price
    19 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Happy with the feature set
    95%
    Happy with the feature set
    20 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    94%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    17 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation went as expected
    95%
    Implementation went as expected
    20 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Best Alternatives
    JobberThreatConnect Risk Quantifier™ (RQ)
    Small Businesses
    Kickserv
    Score9.3 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    Medium-sized Companies
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Enterprises
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    JobberThreatConnect Risk Quantifier™ (RQ)
    Likelihood to Recommend
    9.9
    (22 ratings)
    7.3
    (1 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    2.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Usability
    8.5
    (18 ratings)
    7.3
    (1 ratings)
    Support Rating
    4.0
    (2 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    JobberThreatConnect Risk Quantifier™ (RQ)
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Jobber - Field Service Software
    The cost of Jobber is not suitable for a startup - even our company size is hard pressed to squeeze in other areas of business to afford the cost. Zenmaid or other maid-forward services may be better suited since Jobber seems to focus it's offerings on one-off as opposed to recurring services like ours. For business who do in-person estimates like ours, the streamlined estimate feature which causes increased conversion rates makes it worth the cost - as we anecdotally gain more business this way. However, if we switch to an online booking / instant booking model as opposed to in-person estimates, we may not require this feature. Zenmaid has a "gamified" residential booking page that was extremely high converting for us - we received sometimes 30+ inquiries per day due to the ease of use - MANY more completed inquiries than we receive now - but they didn't have a quoting and deposit collection tool - so here we are. If we used their instant booking feature we would have stayed due to the scheduling tool, gap finder, prevention of double booking employees, and cleaning service focus, as well as significantly reduced pricing.
    Read full review
    ThreatConnect
    Well-Suited Scenarios: Reporting to management where financial risk metrics are required. - Vulnerability prioritization when you need to rank issues by real exploit risk and financial/business impact. Less-Appropriate Scenarios: Fast-changing cloud environments where asset data needs updates too frequently for accurate models required all the time. - Incident investigation, as ThreatConnect Risk Quantifier™ (RQ) is not designed for real-time check
    Read full review
    Pros
    Jobber - Field Service Software
    • The program and schedule is easy to use, operate, and easy to navigate
    • Jobber offers the monthly fee at a very affordable price point
    • Jobber makes it easy for my employees to clock in.
    • Jobber makes it easy for me to adjust time and tailor each employee's Jobber experience
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ThreatConnect
    • Provides scenario-based modeling to measure risk, which can be reduced through patches or new controls.
    • Delivers technical-to-business reporting that supports remediation planning and financial budget planning.
    • Ranks vulnerabilities by exploit risk and business impact
    • Quantifies cyber risk in financial terms using vulnerability, threat, and asset data.
    Read full review
    Cons
    Jobber - Field Service Software
    • For us, sometimes doesn't save the data, just gone, especially terrible if you have a data interruption since it has zero offline capability.
    • I think the price is way high now, made the mistake of 'upgrading' and cannot go back.
    • In my experience, way too easy to create a duplicate entry of anything, then near impossible to clean up, unless you notice it immediately.
    • I found no merge functionality. Same client has two entries? Too bad.
    • In my experience, does not work with Xero accounting software, took a long time to figure that out especially since they advertise it and that was why we chose both of them, for the supposed integration. For us, Quickbooks was also a pain.
    • In my experience, the app is unusable, must use the web version on a mobile device.
    • In my experience, the integrated payment processing cannot accept debit in Canada, only credit cards.
    Read full review
    ThreatConnect
    • Dashboards can be customized to offer more options, especially for technical teams that require deeper drill-downs and also more simpler and user-friendly.
    • Processing large data files can be slow sometimes, especially during large builds or bulk updates.
    • Risk modules sometimes need manual intervention for multi-client environments, which can be time-consuming.
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    Jobber - Field Service Software
    I am anxious to replace it but there will be effort to learn and switch.
    Read full review
    ThreatConnect
    No answers on this topic
    Usability
    Jobber - Field Service Software
    Jobber is an easy-to-use and friendly software designed for efficiency. Its interface is well-organized, ensuring that each section is intuitive and accessible. Users can navigate smoothly through tasks, making project management simpler. Overall, Jobber enhances productivity and streamlines operations, making it a valuable tool for various projects.
    Read full review
    ThreatConnect
    I rate ThreatConnect Risk Quantifier™ (RQ) an 8 because it’s generally easy to use once the integrations are set up. The dashboards, risk scores, and financial impact metrics are very straightforward and help make quick decisions for executives. However, the initial configuration and model tuning can be a bit complex it's not a perfect 10 for me.
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    Jobber - Field Service Software
    There is hardly an app that covers it all while staying simple and wrapping up the process. From the filing of the request, everything goes smoothly following a natural progression. Reports are insightful, give you an instant overview and easy to understand. In addition, you can easily track any information from those on clients to expense tracking.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ThreatConnect
    No answers on this topic
    Alternatives Considered
    Jobber - Field Service Software
    Square only allows for scheduling to one person. And my team couldn’t see their schedules. As a cleaning company, I need to let cleaners know what their pay is without them seeing what I’m charging. That’s game changer about Kobber.
    Read full review
    ThreatConnect
    ThreatConnect Risk Quantifier™ (RQ) stacked up better than RiskLens, better for our organization, is mainly because it integrates directly with our scanners, SIEM, and CMDB, allowing automatic, real-time risk monitoring. It also combines exploit intel, asset value, and vulnerability data more efficiently, giving us clearer technical priorities for the business impact. We chose ThreatConnect Risk Quantifier™ (RQ) because it provides faster, more actionable risk scoring with less manual modeling than RiskLens.
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Jobber - Field Service Software
    • It has dramatically helped keep us organized
    • It has helped us keep payments taken care of and ensures that we don't miss an invoice
    • It is great for our lead process
    • I would like to see a lead board or line to help keep track of leads
    Read full review
    ThreatConnect
    • Improved alignment between IT, security, and business teams because risk is measured in financial terms, not just technical terms.
    • It gives leadership clear cost-based risk metrics, making it easier to justify security budgets and prioritize projects.
    • Initial setup and data integration require time and more disruption to the existing setup
    • Risk models sometimes need tuning, adding extra operational overhead.
    Read full review
    ScreenShots