Jupyter Notebook vs. Windward Core

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Jupyter Notebook
Score 8.5 out of 10
N/A
Jupyter Notebook is an open-source web application that allows users to create and share documents containing live code, equations, visualizations and narrative text. Uses include: data cleaning and transformation, numerical simulation, statistical modeling, data visualization, and machine learning. It supports over 40 programming languages, and notebooks can be shared with others using email, Dropbox, GitHub and the Jupyter Notebook Viewer. It is used with JupyterLab, a web-based IDE for…N/A
Windward Core
Score 9.1 out of 10
Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
Windward’s low-code document generation solution embeds into any application, enabling users to populate data-smart documents within the familiar landscape of Microsoft Office. It's a solution from PDFTron since the April 2021 acquisition.
$190
per month
Pricing
Jupyter NotebookWindward Core
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Windward Hub Standard
$19.00
Per User, Per Month (10 user minimum)*
Windward Hub Premium
$49.00
Per User, Per Month (10 user minimum)*
Windward Core Pro
$547.00
per month*
Windward Core Flex
$605.00
per month*
Windward Hub Enterprise
Custom Pricing
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Jupyter NotebookWindward Core
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoYes
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details*Pay annually: 15% discount 10% discount for quarterly payment of Windward Core.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Jupyter NotebookWindward Core
Features
Jupyter NotebookWindward Core
Platform Connectivity
Comparison of Platform Connectivity features of Product A and Product B
Jupyter Notebook
9.0
22 Ratings
8% above category average
Windward Core
-
Ratings
Connect to Multiple Data Sources10.022 Ratings00 Ratings
Extend Existing Data Sources10.021 Ratings00 Ratings
Automatic Data Format Detection8.514 Ratings00 Ratings
MDM Integration7.415 Ratings00 Ratings
Data Exploration
Comparison of Data Exploration features of Product A and Product B
Jupyter Notebook
7.0
22 Ratings
19% below category average
Windward Core
-
Ratings
Visualization6.022 Ratings00 Ratings
Interactive Data Analysis8.022 Ratings00 Ratings
Data Preparation
Comparison of Data Preparation features of Product A and Product B
Jupyter Notebook
9.5
22 Ratings
15% above category average
Windward Core
-
Ratings
Interactive Data Cleaning and Enrichment10.021 Ratings00 Ratings
Data Transformations10.022 Ratings00 Ratings
Data Encryption8.514 Ratings00 Ratings
Built-in Processors9.314 Ratings00 Ratings
Platform Data Modeling
Comparison of Platform Data Modeling features of Product A and Product B
Jupyter Notebook
9.3
22 Ratings
10% above category average
Windward Core
-
Ratings
Multiple Model Development Languages and Tools10.021 Ratings00 Ratings
Automated Machine Learning9.218 Ratings00 Ratings
Single platform for multiple model development10.022 Ratings00 Ratings
Self-Service Model Delivery8.020 Ratings00 Ratings
Model Deployment
Comparison of Model Deployment features of Product A and Product B
Jupyter Notebook
10.0
20 Ratings
16% above category average
Windward Core
-
Ratings
Flexible Model Publishing Options10.020 Ratings00 Ratings
Security, Governance, and Cost Controls10.019 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Jupyter NotebookWindward Core
Small Businesses
IBM Watson Studio
IBM Watson Studio
Score 10.0 out of 10
airSlate WorkFlow
airSlate WorkFlow
Score 9.9 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Posit
Posit
Score 10.0 out of 10
Foxit PDF Editor
Foxit PDF Editor
Score 8.6 out of 10
Enterprises
Posit
Posit
Score 10.0 out of 10
Conga Composer
Conga Composer
Score 8.1 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Jupyter NotebookWindward Core
Likelihood to Recommend
10.0
(23 ratings)
9.1
(25 ratings)
Usability
10.0
(2 ratings)
9.1
(16 ratings)
Support Rating
9.0
(1 ratings)
9.1
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
Jupyter NotebookWindward Core
Likelihood to Recommend
Open Source
I've created a number of daisy chain notebooks for different workflows, and every time, I create my workflows with other users in mind. Jupiter Notebook makes it very easy for me to outline my thought process in as granular a way as I want without using innumerable small. inline comments.
Read full review
Apryse
Great for Technical Users. It's great for people a bit more on the technical side. It allows developers to quickly create and modify reporting templates without having to modify source code or make updates to a repository. Potentially Difficult for Non-Technical Users. Making substantial changes to the data portions of reporting can be a bit difficult for non-technical users. While Windward's tools for this are great, it still requires an understanding of the database schema which not all users will have.
Read full review
Pros
Open Source
  • Simple and elegant code writing ability. Easier to understand the code that way.
  • The ability to see the output after each step.
  • The ability to use ton of library functions in Python.
  • Easy-user friendly interface.
Read full review
Apryse
  • Native Office output -- not nested tables and/or horrible RTF like other tools generate.
  • Ease of use -- once the data sources are set up, creating tables is as simple as drag and drop (okay, maybe not exactly that simple, but you can certainly create a table of data using drag and drop, then format it and manipulate it as needed).
  • Responsive developers and support -- when I've had questions, they've been addressed VERY quickly and professionally.
Read full review
Cons
Open Source
  • Need more Hotkeys for creating a beautiful notebook. Sometimes we need to download other plugins which messes [with] its default settings.
  • Not as powerful as IDE, which sometimes makes [the] job difficult and allows duplicate code as it get confusing when the number of lines increases. Need a feature where [an] error comes if duplicate code is found or [if a] developer tries the same function name.
Read full review
Apryse
  • It is hard to pick out the tags if they are mixed in with a block of text.
  • Using report variables in select statements causes the selection list of available fields to not show anything.
  • The color themes do not match the office selection and it feels very disconnected.
Read full review
Usability
Open Source
Jupyter is highly simplistic. It took me about 5 mins to install and create my first "hello world" without having to look for help. The UI has minimalist options and is quite intuitive for anyone to become a pro in no time. The lightweight nature makes it even more likeable.
Read full review
Apryse
For the most part, the Windward report designer is intuitive for our users; but there are a few areas where it is less intuitive. In these cases, our users need to search Windwards support wiki site, or even contact their support technicians. This can also be due to the short time we've had Windward and our lack of knowledge.
Read full review
Support Rating
Open Source
I haven't had a need to contact support. However, all required help is out there in public forums.
Read full review
Apryse
Support is something they take pride in. Once an issue is raised, they are quick to respond and provide details on a fix. No complaints on support here.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Open Source
With Jupyter Notebook besides doing data analysis and performing complex visualizations you can also write machine learning algorithms with a long list of libraries that it supports. You can make better predictions, observations etc. with it which can help you achieve better business decisions and save cost to the company. It stacks up better as we know Python is more widely used than R in the industry and can be learnt easily. Unlike PyCharm jupyter notebooks can be used to make documentations and exported in a variety of formats.
Read full review
Apryse
We evaluated several other products to integrate with our new software, but Windward Studios was an obvious standout above the majority. Other applications required some level of software development knowledge and experience to create templates and a much steeper learning curve. After consideration of ease of use, as well as a cost-comparison between different products, Windward Studios was the most suitable product to meet our needs.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Open Source
  • Positive impact: flexible implementation on any OS, for many common software languages
  • Positive impact: straightforward duplication for adaptation of workflows for other projects
  • Negative impact: sometimes encourages pigeonholing of data science work into notebooks versus extending code capability into software integration
Read full review
Apryse
  • As a fully integrated solution, the ROI is impacted when a client gets stickier with our solution because they see the benefit of Windward.
  • Support has been fantastic for our development team so that as we integrate the solutions we have a clear and clean design.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Windward Core Screenshots

Screenshot of Screenshot of