LambdaTest

Overview
Product	Rating	Most Used By	Product Summary	Starting Price
LambdaTest	Score 7.2 out of 10	Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)	LambdaTest is a cloud-based platform that helps users run manual and automation tests of their website and mobile apps. Users can test their native mobile application (Android and iOS) and mobile websites on Real Devices on cloud or choose from emulators & simulators for a multitude of configurations.	$15 per month per user

Pricing

LambdaTest

Editions & Modules

Lifetime Free: $0
1 Concurrent session Per Month
Live: 15/Month (Billed Annually)
per month Parallel Test
Real Device (Includes Live): 25/ Month (Billed Annually)
per month Parallel Test
Web Automation: $79/per Month (Billed Annually)
per month Parallel Test
Web & Mobile Browser Automation: $99/per Month (Billed Annually)
per month Parallel Test
Native App Automation: $125/per Month (Billed Annually)
per month Parallel Test
Web & Mobile Browser on Real Device: $128/per Month (Billed Annually)
per month Parallel Test
HyperExecute Cloud (Multi OS): $159/per Month (Billed Annually)
per month Parallel Test
HyperExecute On-Premise: CUSTOM PRICING
Parallel Test
Enterprise: CUSTOM PRICING
Parallel Test

Offerings

Pricing Offerings
LambdaTest
Free Trial
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
Yes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No

Entry-level Setup Fee

No setup fee

Additional Details

For Enterprises Customize plans. Please contact our Chat Support or drop us email at support@lambdatest.com

More Pricing Information

Community Pulse
	LambdaTest
Considered Both Products	LambdaTest SA sanaullah asadi Senior Network Architect Chose LambdaTest Lambda is more cheaper and simpilistic compared to all of the others Incentivized Helpful? VG Vineet Gupta Senior Software Engineer Chose LambdaTest Very cost effective product. LambdaTest gives all QA functionality in less price compare to other products. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Engineer Chose LambdaTest I have used Browserstack for cross browser testing and app testing. Incentivized Helpful? Mike Shipley Web Developer Chose LambdaTest I ended up just sticking with the regular web inspector in my browser Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Engineer Chose LambdaTest They have a lot of device options Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Team Lead Chose LambdaTest We have been using Samsung Test Lab whcih was free since we using it from 2019. but its only limited to samsung devices. Incentivized Helpful? Sabi Uddin Senior Test Engineer Chose LambdaTest LambdaTest offers me a large number of real-time mobile devices and browsers for testing, as well as debugging tools like Screenshot Testing and Issue Tracker. This is what I like the most about LambdaTest and prefer it over Sauce Labs. Additionally, my team has reported faster … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Engineer Chose LambdaTest there is some time limit bound which was the reason I found this application Incentivized Helpful? Arjun Mohan Shrivastva Test Engineer Chose LambdaTest wide range of virtual devices, Cheaper plan Helpful? AV Aman Valand Business analyst Chose LambdaTest I have not used any other product except LambdaTest, this is the first product I've tried and I am loving it, no regrets. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Team Lead Chose LambdaTest Ease of use Cost effective Helpful? Verified User Team Lead Chose LambdaTest NA Incentivized Helpful? Sermasundar J Senior engineer Chose LambdaTest extensive browser and device coverage Helpful? PH Prasanna HR QA Tech Lead Chose LambdaTest The test runs are faster in Lambdatest, Integration of lambdatest is easier and lambdatest is less expensive compared to other products like BrowserStack or saucelabs Incentivized Helpful? BP Brian Poole Senior Lead Engineer Chose LambdaTest To be honest, I chose Lambdatest over BitBar because there was a cheaper plan. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Analyst Chose LambdaTest No we did not had a need to check alternatives Incentivized Helpful? Kyle Zinger Owner / Creative Director Chose LambdaTest LambdaTest stands out from its competitors due to its affordable pricing model, intuitive user interface, and comprehensive set of features. Its real-time testing feature allows users to test their websites on a range of devices and browsers in real-time, enabling quick issue … Incentivized Helpful? David Borg Qa Manager Chose LambdaTest The dashboard on Lambda was a lot easier and more intuitive to use, BS may have offered the latest devices quicker but Lambda was never far behind and when comparing the two the experience with Lambda was a lot quicker and more fluid. The way the option were laid out was clean … Helpful? Verified User Analyst Chose LambdaTest I have used Browserstack, which as I understand is a direct competitor for LambdaTest. LambdaTest is much quicker with its tool then Browserstack, which is a huge deal for me and the company I work in. Speed and efficiency is crucial to our company and that's one of the main … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Engineer Chose LambdaTest We have been using BrowserStack as well but in terms of features speed and stability, I would say that LambdaTest is what my organization loved the most. Its wasy an intiative UI is good for even normal non-technical staff as well, Pricing wise LambdaTest is way good than Browse… Incentivized Helpful? AN Anderson Nick Administrative Services Manager Chose LambdaTest Pricing and User friendly Helpful? Verified User Project Manager Chose LambdaTest We can now provide our services with complete confidence that they will work seamlessly on all devices. The user interface is user-friendly and easy to navigate, making it easy for my team to get started with the platform. I highly recommend LambdaTest to any organization that … Incentivized Helpful? AL Ash Lawson Head of Architecture Chose LambdaTest LambdaTest beat the competition on value, reliability, speed and customer support. It was a pleasure to work with them throughout our proof of concept trial and they were extremely helpful. Helpful? Miroslav Ralevic Sr. Automation Engineer Chose LambdaTest . Helpful? Keir Smith Full-stack Developer Chose LambdaTest It has real devices and native app testing but these are not our absolute priority and these two features were making it more expensive. Otherwise they are also really good at their offering and services. Real devices are tad bit slower in my opinion as compared to simulators … Helpful?
Top Pros	Pro Cross browser Pro Browser testing Pro Real time
Top Cons	Minus Native app Minus Real devices Minus Virtual machine

Best Alternatives
	LambdaTest
Small Businesses	BrowserStack Score 8.3 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies	Selenium Score 8.1 out of 10
Enterprises	Selenium Score 8.1 out of 10
All Alternatives	View all alternatives

User Ratings
	LambdaTest
Likelihood to Recommend	8.4 (51 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew	7.7 (3 ratings)
Usability	9.1 (3 ratings)
Support Rating	9.1 (5 ratings)
Implementation Rating	9.1 (1 ratings)

User Testimonials
	LambdaTest
Likelihood to Recommend	LambdaTest, Inc. In my opinion, I believe LambdaTest is very good and well suited for Cross-browser testing, Mobile application testing and Automated testing. But yes, there is always scope of improvement. In my experience, LambdaTest does not currently offer robust security testing features, so when we need to conduct extensive security testing on our applications we need to use other specialized tools Incentivized Sabi Uddin Senior Test Engineer Read full review
Pros	LambdaTest, Inc. Offers geolocation testing in automation which is amazing! You can select browsers, timezone, country and run the capability to start testing instantly. We could scale up with parallel testing on local environment without any maintenance cost. Integration with project management tools like JIRA, CI/CD tools like Jenkins, Gitlab which makes our test cycle easier Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Cons	LambdaTest, Inc. Sometimes the live apps gets slow so its better that this doesn't happen more often Still room to add more device vendors like, Huawei now doesn't support play services so its better thay we also have some devices which are with Huawei services only Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Usability	LambdaTest, Inc. LambdaTest provides video recording and screenshots of all your tests in their test logs, which makes tracking easier. Test statuses, such as Lambda Error and VM allocation, allowed us to quickly troubleshoot any build that failed while executing. So overall, it's been great to use for our Tester and Developer team. Tolga Ovali QA Analyst Read full review
Support Rating	LambdaTest, Inc. The customer support team is very active and cooperative. Once, I contacted them in their off timings because of an issue, I got an instant reply from the executive and he resolved the issue very efficiently. This is why we have been using LambdaTest for more than two years. It is best suited for us. Katie Hans Software Automation Engineer Read full review
Implementation Rating	LambdaTest, Inc. Implementation of Lambdatest was very easy for different project requirements. Incentivized PH Prasanna HR QA Tech Lead Read full review
Alternatives Considered	LambdaTest, Inc. LambdaTest stands out from its competitors due to its affordable pricing model, intuitive user interface, and comprehensive set of features. Its real-time testing feature allows users to test their websites on a range of devices and browsers in real-time, enabling quick issue identification and resolution. The automated testing feature allows users to run tests in parallel across multiple browsers and devices, resulting in faster test execution and improved test coverage.LambdaTest's visual testing feature is particularly noteworthy as it enables users to identify visual differences between their website on different browsers and devices. This feature helps users identify and fix issues related to design or layout. LambdaTest also offers debugging tools that allow users to quickly identify and fix issues within their code.Compared to its competitors, LambdaTest offers an affordable and comprehensive solution for cross-browser testing. While each tool has its own strengths and weaknesses, LambdaTest's robust feature set, user-friendly interface, and affordable pricing make it a popular choice among developers and testers. Incentivized Kyle Zinger Owner / Creative Director Read full review
Return on Investment	LambdaTest, Inc. Automation testing has a bit of a learning curve Lack of real device keep that bug in your head if not on the website. Need to wait for a while for a new OS or browser version on the contrary of immediate availability in case of owning a lab Keir Smith Full-stack Developer Read full review
ScreenShots	LambdaTest Screenshots