TestMu AI vs. Tricentis Testim Salesforce

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
TestMu AI
Score 8.9 out of 10
Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
TestMu AI (Formerly LambdaTest) is a Full Stack Agentic AI Quality Engineering platform that uses end-to-end AI agents to plan, author, execute, and analyze software quality. The platform enables testing of web, mobile, and enterprise applications at any scale across real devices, real browsers, and custom real-world environments.
$19
per month per user
Tricentis Testim Salesforce
Score 6.4 out of 10
N/A
Tricentis Test Automation for Salesforce supports test creation and execution for users of all skill levels to improve the quality of upgrades, applications, and customizations. Using its recorder or test builder, teams can create and manage test cases, regardless of the environment or the user's skill level.N/A
Pricing
TestMu AITricentis Testim Salesforce
Editions & Modules
Live
$19
per month Parallel Test
Real Device (Includes Live)
$35
per month Parallel Test
Web & Mobile Browser Automation
$119
per month Parallel Test
Native App Automation
$149
per month Parallel Test
Web & Mobile Browser on Real Device
$158
per month Parallel Test
HyperExecute Cloud (Multi OS)
$199
per month Parallel Test
SmartUI Visual Regression
$219
per month Parallel Test
Enterprise
Custom Pricing
Parallel Test
HyperExecute On-Premise
Custom Pricing
per parallel test
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
TestMu AITricentis Testim Salesforce
Free Trial
YesYes
Free/Freemium Version
YesYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeOptional
Additional DetailsDiscount available for annual pricing.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
TestMu AITricentis Testim Salesforce
Features
TestMu AITricentis Testim Salesforce
Automation Testing
Comparison of Automation Testing features of Product A and Product B
TestMu AI
-
Ratings
Tricentis Testim Salesforce
7.2
8 Ratings
16% below category average
Record and Automate00 Ratings7.07 Ratings
Multi-Browser Testing00 Ratings6.47 Ratings
Mobile Testing00 Ratings7.26 Ratings
Test Scheduling00 Ratings7.38 Ratings
Test Management00 Ratings7.47 Ratings
CI/CD Tool Integration00 Ratings8.07 Ratings
Integrated Version Control00 Ratings7.07 Ratings
Parallel Testing00 Ratings8.76 Ratings
Object Recognition00 Ratings7.47 Ratings
Data-Driven Testing00 Ratings8.17 Ratings
Testing Collaboration00 Ratings7.18 Ratings
Real Device Testing00 Ratings5.67 Ratings
Testing Reports & Analytics00 Ratings6.57 Ratings
Best Alternatives
TestMu AITricentis Testim Salesforce
Small Businesses
BrowserStack
BrowserStack
Score 8.5 out of 10
BrowserStack
BrowserStack
Score 8.5 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
BrowserStack
BrowserStack
Score 8.5 out of 10
ReadyAPI
ReadyAPI
Score 6.4 out of 10
Enterprises
BrowserStack
BrowserStack
Score 8.5 out of 10
ignio AIOps
ignio AIOps
Score 8.1 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
TestMu AITricentis Testim Salesforce
Likelihood to Recommend
9.1
(110 ratings)
6.2
(8 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
8.7
(7 ratings)
7.0
(1 ratings)
Usability
9.2
(62 ratings)
7.2
(8 ratings)
Availability
10.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Performance
9.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
10.0
(7 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
9.0
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Configurability
8.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Contract Terms and Pricing Model
9.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
10.0
(1 ratings)
7.6
(5 ratings)
Product Scalability
10.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
9.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
9.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
TestMu AITricentis Testim Salesforce
Likelihood to Recommend
LambdaTest Inc.
One day, I needed to test a specific issue that was occurring only on Pixel phones. I turned to LambdaTest, quickly identified the problem, and was able to fix it. There hasn't been a situation where I felt LambdaTest didn't help, it's my go-to solution for testing, as it solves many problems.
Read full review
Tricentis
My organization heavily customizes Salesforce to align it with specific business processes, adding custom fields, workflows, and triggers. With each Salesforce release or customization update, we need to ensure that existing functionalities and customizations remain intact.Tricentis Test Automation for Salesforce excels in this scenario. Its ability to create and execute comprehensive regression test suites efficiently ensures that customizations don't introduce unexpected issues or regressions. We can automate the validation of custom workflows, triggers, and data integrity, saving time and reducing the risk of errors.
Read full review
Pros
LambdaTest Inc.
  • Very accessible as multiple users can be added in each subscription
  • Very reliable as it is very close to the actual device when it comes to operating system and version behavior
  • There are a lot of options for devices and browsers that users can choose from when it comes to emulating and testing
Read full review
Tricentis
  • Creation of Salesforce objects automatically
  • AI-powered Smart locators
  • Creation of test cases and modification is so easy compare to any other tool
Read full review
Cons
LambdaTest Inc.
  • More real devices should be added like I have Samsung mobile but it was not in the list
  • It takes time in checking the link on LambdaTest if we compare with real mobiles
  • Sometimes exact results are not matching as from real mobiles
Read full review
Tricentis
  • The available documentation and learning resources are not extensive enough.
  • The tool lacks sufficient customization options for creating and managing test cases.
  • Limited integration with other tools and platforms.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
LambdaTest Inc.
The reason i have given the 10 points becasue the problem LambdaTest solves is providing access to all devices in one place, allowing developers to identify the same errors they would encounter on real devices. This makes life much easier, especially for developers who regularly face cross-device functionality issues. It's a big plus point that positions LambdaTest as an all-in-one solution.
Read full review
Tricentis
We will renew but hope they improve their mobile experience.
Read full review
Usability
LambdaTest Inc.
Because of the ease of use of the platform, we just save a lot of time and effort with this as its a feature rich solution, we just need to upload app binary once and for everytime we need to test on a different device we can just directly install that binary on the device without the pain of reupload.
Read full review
Tricentis
Very good tool, first of this kind so no element to compare but still very good tool. It allows us to gain a lot of time and to be very deep in the testing phases
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
LambdaTest Inc.
yes always available
Read full review
Tricentis
No answers on this topic
Performance
LambdaTest Inc.
haven't found any glitch while using this
Read full review
Tricentis
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
LambdaTest Inc.
The customer support team is very active and cooperative. Once, I contacted them in their off timings because of an issue, I got an instant reply from the executive and he resolved the issue very efficiently. This is why we have been using LambdaTest for more than two years. It is best suited for us.
Read full review
Tricentis
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
LambdaTest Inc.
Implementation of Lambdatest was very easy for different project requirements.
Read full review
Tricentis
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
LambdaTest Inc.
While BrowserStack is also a well-established platform, we found LambdaTest to offer similar and even better features at reasonable pricing. LambdaTest is more cost-effective than BrowserStack. LambdaTest provides a free forever plan, while BrowserStack does not. Even manual testing plans are better priced than BrowserStack’s. In terms of UI and onboarding, we found LambdaTest more user-friendly as well.
Read full review
Tricentis
We selected Tricentis Test Automation due to it's ease of use. It was the pricier option out of the competitve pool, however, it was important for us to have a scalable solution that integrated with all of our technologies and platforms. It was the most user-friendly tool and took the least amount of time to onboard individuals.
Read full review
Scalability
LambdaTest Inc.
not all department, but we're using for our clients
Read full review
Tricentis
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
LambdaTest Inc.
  • Automation testing has a bit of a learning curve
  • Lack of real device keep that bug in your head if not on the website.
  • Need to wait for a while for a new OS or browser version on the contrary of immediate availability in case of owning a lab
Read full review
Tricentis
  • Improved productivity of QA team a lot
  • Efficiency of test automation scripts gone up
  • Automating test cases is so easy and reduced lot of efforts
Read full review
ScreenShots

TestMu AI Screenshots

Screenshot of an automated screenshotScreenshot of mobile-browser-testingScreenshot of automation testing on LambdatestScreenshot of some of the available integrations.Screenshot of real-time testingScreenshot of responsive testing

Tricentis Testim Salesforce Screenshots

Screenshot of LightningScreenshot of Prebuilt PractionersScreenshot of Test runs