Landscape Management Network (LMN) vs. Miro

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Landscape Management Network (LMN)
Score 8.6 out of 10
N/A
LMN is a North American provider of business management software and learning opportunities for landscape professionals. The vendor states their proprietary cloud-based platform is used by over 85,000 employees every day across Canada and the US. From budgeting and estimating through to scheduling, time tracking and invoicing, LMN aims to help build better landscape businesses with software that grows profit, confidence and freedom as well as training opportunities through the LMN Academy.N/A
Miro
Score 9.1 out of 10
N/A
Miro is the AI Innovation Workspace that brings teams and AI together to plan, co-create, and build the next big thing, faster. With the canvas as the prompt, Miro's collaborative AI workflows keep teams in the flow of work, scale shifts in ways of working, and drive organization-wide transformation.
$10
per month per user
Pricing
Landscape Management Network (LMN)Miro
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
1. Free - To discover what Miro can do. Always free
$0
2. Starter - Unlimited and private boards with essential features
$8
per month (billed annually) per user
3. Business - Scales collaboration with advanced features and security
$16
per month (billed annually) per user
4. Enterprise - For work across the entire organization, with support, security and control, to scale
contact sales
annual billing per user
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Landscape Management Network (LMN)Miro
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
YesYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeOptional
Additional DetailsMonthly billing also available at $10 per month for the Starter plan, or $20 for the Business plan.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Landscape Management Network (LMN)Miro
Features
Landscape Management Network (LMN)Miro
Project Management
Comparison of Project Management features of Product A and Product B
Landscape Management Network (LMN)
8.3
2 Ratings
7% above category average
Miro
-
Ratings
Task Management8.02 Ratings00 Ratings
Scheduling8.52 Ratings00 Ratings
Workflow Automation6.52 Ratings00 Ratings
Team Collaboration8.52 Ratings00 Ratings
Timesheet Tracking9.52 Ratings00 Ratings
Change request and Case Management8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Budget and Expense Management9.02 Ratings00 Ratings
Professional Services Automation
Comparison of Professional Services Automation features of Product A and Product B
Landscape Management Network (LMN)
8.6
2 Ratings
11% above category average
Miro
-
Ratings
Quotes/estimates9.52 Ratings00 Ratings
Invoicing7.52 Ratings00 Ratings
Project & financial reporting8.52 Ratings00 Ratings
Integration with accounting software9.02 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Landscape Management Network (LMN)Miro
Small Businesses
Stackby
Stackby
Score 8.9 out of 10
Lucid Visual Collaboration Suite
Lucid Visual Collaboration Suite
Score 8.9 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
InEight
InEight
Score 8.3 out of 10
Lucid Visual Collaboration Suite
Lucid Visual Collaboration Suite
Score 8.9 out of 10
Enterprises
InEight
InEight
Score 8.3 out of 10
Lucid Visual Collaboration Suite
Lucid Visual Collaboration Suite
Score 8.9 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Landscape Management Network (LMN)Miro
Likelihood to Recommend
8.0
(2 ratings)
9.1
(6063 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
9.4
(185 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
8.6
(449 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
9.5
(20 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(19 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
7.7
(63 ratings)
In-Person Training
-
(0 ratings)
1.0
(1 ratings)
Online Training
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(7 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(3657 ratings)
Configurability
-
(0 ratings)
8.7
(14 ratings)
Ease of integration
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(3999 ratings)
Product Scalability
-
(0 ratings)
8.7
(19 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
-
(0 ratings)
6.3
(7 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
-
(0 ratings)
5.9
(8 ratings)
User Testimonials
Landscape Management Network (LMN)Miro
Likelihood to Recommend
Landscape Management Network
LMN is best used if you go all in on it, otherwise you'll end having to use several other software to round it out. Making use of budgeting, estimating, timesheet, job costing, invoicing, payment, planning can all be done with this software. If used to it's potential, i can make running a business a seamless and timesaving endeavour.
Read full review
Miro
Actually I answered this question on the first step. Detailing it I’d say that it’s comfortable to use for company education or brainstorm sessions, but I lack of flexibility to use it for operations quick stuff cuz team plans are limited
Read full review
Pros
Landscape Management Network
  • time tracking
  • client data retention
  • project estimating
  • material data retention
Read full review
Miro
  • Makes internal coordination between admin team and tutors extremely painless. It's like a single place where everyone can drop ideas, get updates and notes without loss of context which usually happens in long email threads.
  • Versioning and board history are handled very well, which drastically reduces the workload. They help me track how a policy or math guideline has evolved, and also make it easy to revert changes if something doesn't work.
  • Comments stick exactly where they are meant to, making internal reviews much clearer. Admins don't have to guess which note refers to which rule or section.
  • Exports are clean, so even non-Miro teammates get it instantly.
Read full review
Cons
Landscape Management Network
  • Customer facing experience can be improved and modernized
  • Estimating component has been stagnant can needs updates
  • Better budgeting system would be good
Read full review
Miro
  • As a designer, I miss some more creative features. I can't even get really into designing small things (like paths). Many of my colleagues have already switched to the Figma board because it is possible there.
  • Things often get lost in the workflow, especially in teams. Working on the same file often leads to misunderstandings and can be frustrating. For example, if text is accidentally deleted and cannot be recovered, or if images become distorted.
  • The scale on the board is missing, which often leads to size differences.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Landscape Management Network
No answers on this topic
Miro
Miro saves my day. I would spend at least 4x more time on documenting my projects and work without this tool. It support my day to day role and helps me be successful while saving my capacity. It is not only very easy to start working on it without additional training required, but also adapts to any use case that I might need to implement
Read full review
Usability
Landscape Management Network
No answers on this topic
Miro
There are some features that I think could be smoother or more dynamic in the free version; for instance, the connection of graphics/text boxes with lines can get a bit messy and a bit limited if you want to do something specific with the line, like a free-drawn element. But this is really minor!
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
Landscape Management Network
No answers on this topic
Miro
I have not encountered events where Miro is not available. It is quite nice and reliable to be fair, even on my freemium version (startup) I don't have reliability issues. It does have sometimes where the screen refresh or "freezes" or "consumes a lot of data" and we have to rewind windows and the likes, this instances are very less
Read full review
Performance
Landscape Management Network
No answers on this topic
Miro
I took the loading quickly to be related to availability which I commented on before, so ditto with those comment on load time here. Although to reemphasize, Miro doesn't crash or just refuse to load like some other programs. The weak point of Miro for me is integration of files like Word, Excel, or PowerPoint (especially the later two). When you embed these, it gets slow, and complicated to bring them up while you're in the application.
Read full review
Support Rating
Landscape Management Network
No answers on this topic
Miro
We have never reached out to or contacted support because Miro's platform has been incredibly intuitive and user-friendly. The comprehensive resources available, such as tutorials, documentation, and community forums, have provided all the guidance we needed. The seamless integration with our existing tools and the reliability of the platform have ensured that we rarely encounter issues that require external assistance. This self-sufficiency has allowed us to focus more on our projects and collaboration without interruptions. Overall, our experience with Miro has been smooth and efficient, eliminating the need for additional support
Read full review
Online Training
Landscape Management Network
No answers on this topic
Miro
There was a series of webinars which Miro hosted with our organization that went over the basics, then progressively became more advanced with additional sections. The instructors were knowledgeable, and provided examples throughout the sessions, as well as answered peoples' questions. There was ample time and experience on the calls to cover a range of topics. The instructors were also very friendly and sociable, as well as honest. Of course Miro isn't a "God-tool" that does absolutely everything, but the instructors were aware and emphasized the strengths where Miro had them and sincerely accepted feedback.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Landscape Management Network
No answers on this topic
Miro
Easy to learn, Miro has a series of videos on YouTube that effectively taught this program to my team members and me. The program is drag-and-drop and works excellently. People pick up on how to use it efficiently, and it's great for organizing ideas more freely. This product is more challenging for some older audiences who are not accustomed to using a touchpad, but for most, it was very easy to use.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Landscape Management Network
We use both Service Autopilot and Landscape Management Network in tangent with eachother. They work well but, each has pros and cons that are easily eleviated by the other.
Read full review
Miro
Both FigJam and Canva have infinite whiteboarding, but Miro is a much more complete package. FigJam is very fast, but it's also very simplistic in its features. Canva has other qualities, like being more design-heavy, but its whiteboarding feature set is not on par with Miro's. Miro is the only platform that lets a user start a project from a messy brainstorm and bring it to full completion, along with all tasks and deliverables, all on one board.
Read full review
Scalability
Landscape Management Network
No answers on this topic
Miro
Maybe is possible now so... Could be useful to manage in some way source code for the projects? not to edit so when we make solutions with different components in MIro, maybe each component could redirect to the source code of this component
Read full review
Return on Investment
Landscape Management Network
  • Helps with project organization, knowing what a job needs and how much, etc.
  • Allows us to track every labour hours to know where time is spent. Informs where we need to see improvement
  • Makes estimating very quick for anyone. Save time in pricing jobs out so we can shorten sales pipeline.
Read full review
Miro
  • This is one of those platforms where the entire team needs to be bought into it, or it doesn't function as intended. Once we achieved that, it's been a wonderful tool for brainstorming and project management internally.
  • Surprisingly, Miro has not allowed us to reduce software; however, it's a worthwhile addition to our tech stack.
  • Our team has Miro boards bookmarked, and we know exactly where to go when we have ideas or things that we want to add. It's great to know that we will receive notifications when that happens.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Miro Screenshots

Screenshot of Miro's design sprint templates, used to solve big challenges, create new products or improve existing ones.Screenshot of the Sprint Planning features in Miro, that assists Development Teams in creating a transparent understanding of what can be built and how. Users can run sprints and turn a team into creative and active participants. Today, many organizations use Agile tools to manage software development and other non-IT projects.Screenshot of the PI Planning Template that brings teams toward one vision of what stories to develop. Used to manage a backlog, increase productivity, and build the foundation for a successful PI Planning event. Miro’s PI Planning Template helps to get an overview of any PI Planning event, with step-by-step frames to guide the process.Screenshot of diagrams, concept maps, and system mapping templates used to communicate complex flows and create a shared understanding. Users can check off all the essential steps of the diagramming process and gain a complete overview of operations with Miro's diagramming templates collection.