Miro is the AI Innovation Workspace that brings teams and AI together to plan, co-create, and build the next big thing, faster. With the canvas as the prompt, Miro's collaborative AI workflows keep teams in the flow of work, scale shifts in ways of working, and drive organization-wide transformation.
$10
per month per user
Pricing
Miro
Editions & Modules
1. Free - To discover what Miro can do. Always free
$0
2. Starter - Unlimited and private boards with essential features
$8
per month (billed annually) per user
3. Business - Scales collaboration with advanced features and security
$16
per month (billed annually) per user
4. Enterprise - For work across the entire organization, with support, security and control, to scale
contact sales
annual billing per user
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Miro
Free Trial
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
Yes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
Optional
Additional Details
Monthly billing also available at $10 per month for the Starter plan, or $20 for the Business plan.
Miro stacks below Figma for me. I only selected Miro because that is what my company uses. However, I think they chose Miro over Figma because they are more interested in collaborative features than in the prototyping that Figma prioritizes. They also probably chose Miro …
I selected Miro because it combines all work and user friendly with powerfull functionality and features. It helps to create the perfect planning, meeting with clinet or other teams, creating new disigns and diagrams.
Miro is a more flexible product than the others I've used. I find it's interference to be more flexible and feature rich while simultaneously being easier to use.
I already mentioned this, but Miro is good for non-designers to get onboard easier for team building and collaboration. Designers tend to use tools we are comfortable with and can easily switch tabs in one software
While the Microsoft products are useful, Miro has been easier to collaborate on larger whiteboards. Both MS and Miro are available to me and we don't have a "standard" to use Miro, but in my case for my part of the project, a team member chose Miro and I was happy with the …
Microsoft Teams is mainly good for chat and meetings, but it lacks strong visual planning tools. Zoho CRM is more focused on customer management, so it is very different and not focused on collaboration. Jira is good for task tracking & project management, but it feels more …
We also tried Figma, MS Whiteboard, Google Forms, and Notion. Compared to these platforms, Miro felt more flexible for our team collaboration. We liked how simple it was to organize our ideas, create workflows, and collaborate with our team members. We selected Miro because it …
I think Miro is more comprehensive but has a slightly steeper learning curve. But since it is meant for complex scenarios, the learning curve is worth it. Maybe a simple mode might help new users.
It comes down to simplicity really and having everything in one place. I wouldnt use Miro for shot tracking and iterations reviews as thats fsr more a place for ftrack or ShotGrid. But for the planning of a project in its initial stages and keeping everyone on the same page …
We also evaluated tools such as Figma, Notion, and Jamboard for diagram creation. While those tools are useful, Miro provides a better overall experience for workflow diagrams and project planning. because Miro is offering a large variety of templates, easy-to-use collaboration …
Mural is a similar platform we discovered through a client. Miro is a more robust with many new and constantly improved features that prove to be a reliable asset in our creative process. The UI and stability of Miro also surpasses Mural. Overall, Miro has been there for us …
Verified User
Employee
Chose Miro
I think I prefer Miro! A bit more user friendly and visually appealing in my opinion.
We looked at other tools for the freeform communication and collaboration, as well as for tracking timelines and roadmaps, and Miro was just the best overall tool because we can keep everything in one spot and our team only has to learn and one use tool, as opposed to having to …
Excalidraw is better when I simply need to explain some concept. Rest, it's not as wide a variety as Miro, which can sit in day-to-day, multi-dimensional business use.
I've tried using both Figma and FigJam for research and planning purposes but it's not up to scratch for me.
Figma is a UI tool so it's not intended for doing mapping, flows, diagrams, etc.
FigJam isn't as smooth to onboard for people unfamiliar.
Miro is really helpful for team discussions, planning tasks, and visually sharing ideas. I like that multiple people work together at the same time, especially during online meetings. It will be good for creating flowcharts, notes, and project planning boards. Sometimes the large board can be slow, and new users may be confused at first because there are many tools.
Makes internal coordination between admin team and tutors extremely painless. It's like a single place where everyone can drop ideas, get updates and notes without loss of context which usually happens in long email threads.
Versioning and board history are handled very well, which drastically reduces the workload. They help me track how a policy or math guideline has evolved, and also make it easy to revert changes if something doesn't work.
Comments stick exactly where they are meant to, making internal reviews much clearer. Admins don't have to guess which note refers to which rule or section.
Exports are clean, so even non-Miro teammates get it instantly.
Miro saves my day. I would spend at least 4x more time on documenting my projects and work without this tool. It support my day to day role and helps me be successful while saving my capacity. It is not only very easy to start working on it without additional training required, but also adapts to any use case that I might need to implement
This is a hard one.. and totally subjective.. Initially when i started using Miro, i had trouble scrolling here and there.. the canvas was so vast and zoomed out .. Now i have learnt how this works .. I feel we need some kind of indexing at board level, which will give the topics / headings in a concise way .. Like a birds eye view of the components on the board. That might improve usability a bit.
I have not encountered events where Miro is not available. It is quite nice and reliable to be fair, even on my freemium version (startup) I don't have reliability issues. It does have sometimes where the screen refresh or "freezes" or "consumes a lot of data" and we have to rewind windows and the likes, this instances are very less
I took the loading quickly to be related to availability which I commented on before, so ditto with those comment on load time here. Although to reemphasize, Miro doesn't crash or just refuse to load like some other programs. The weak point of Miro for me is integration of files like Word, Excel, or PowerPoint (especially the later two). When you embed these, it gets slow, and complicated to bring them up while you're in the application.
We have never reached out to or contacted support because Miro's platform has been incredibly intuitive and user-friendly. The comprehensive resources available, such as tutorials, documentation, and community forums, have provided all the guidance we needed. The seamless integration with our existing tools and the reliability of the platform have ensured that we rarely encounter issues that require external assistance. This self-sufficiency has allowed us to focus more on our projects and collaboration without interruptions. Overall, our experience with Miro has been smooth and efficient, eliminating the need for additional support
There was a series of webinars which Miro hosted with our organization that went over the basics, then progressively became more advanced with additional sections. The instructors were knowledgeable, and provided examples throughout the sessions, as well as answered peoples' questions. There was ample time and experience on the calls to cover a range of topics. The instructors were also very friendly and sociable, as well as honest. Of course Miro isn't a "God-tool" that does absolutely everything, but the instructors were aware and emphasized the strengths where Miro had them and sincerely accepted feedback.
Easy to learn, Miro has a series of videos on YouTube that effectively taught this program to my team members and me. The program is drag-and-drop and works excellently. People pick up on how to use it efficiently, and it's great for organizing ideas more freely. This product is more challenging for some older audiences who are not accustomed to using a touchpad, but for most, it was very easy to use.
We looked at other tools for the freeform communication and collaboration, as well as for tracking timelines and roadmaps, and Miro was just the best overall tool because we can keep everything in one spot and our team only has to learn and one use tool, as opposed to having to log into multiple spots.
Maybe is possible now so... Could be useful to manage in some way source code for the projects? not to edit so when we make solutions with different components in MIro, maybe each component could redirect to the source code of this component
