Leadfwd vs. WebEngage

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Leadfwd
Score 8.2 out of 10
N/A
Leadfwd, from the company of the same name in Staten Island, combines B2B Prospecting, Sales Outreach and Account-Based Marketing. It replaces the former INBOX25.N/A
WebEngage
Score 4.2 out of 10
N/A
WebEngage calls itself a multi-channel user engagement platform. It automates communication across a user's lifecycle and helps companies send messages via these channels: Web Messages In-app Messages Push Notifications Web Push Notification Email Marketing SMS Marketing Facebook Remarketing According to the vendor, cross-device tracking helps keep communication coherent and contextual, making the…N/A
Pricing
LeadfwdWebEngage
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
LeadfwdWebEngage
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsPricing is customised according to the customer usage and requirement. Contact support@webengage.com to know more about pricing plans.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
LeadfwdWebEngage
Considered Both Products
Leadfwd
Chose Leadfwd
We found Inbox25 to be the most cost-effective marketing automation platform with the best possible integration to Sugar CRM. We evaluated three additional products. Only one was comparable in scope and integration but the cost was 30% more.
Chose Leadfwd
Different platforms stack up particularly well for different use cases. INBOX25 is our default choice for SugarCRM users.
WebEngage
Chose WebEngage
WebEngage helped us and supported us to achieve our business objectives which were lacking with other tools.
Chose WebEngage
WebEngage's dashboard is relatively more intuitive and easy to understand. Further in terms of cost as well it is value to money as it delivers excellent ROI. The after-sales support is also better in terms of responsiveness and helps in case of issues with the execution of …
Chose WebEngage
WebEngage is cheaper to use and has a 6-month startups trial
Chose WebEngage
CleverTap, MoEngage and Netcore Smartech
Chose WebEngage
Both WebEngage & Clevertap are equally good with some weighed advantages at both their ends. When it comes to an easy interface for user journey creation, Clevertap wins the race. When it comes to proper granularized segmentation skills, WebEngage takes a lead. I'd recommend …
Features
LeadfwdWebEngage
Email & Online Marketing
Comparison of Email & Online Marketing features of Product A and Product B
Leadfwd
7.4
Ratings
3% below category average
WebEngage
7.4
Ratings
3% below category average
WYSIWYG email editor7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Dynamic content7.00 Ratings7.30 Ratings
Ability to test dynamic content7.00 Ratings7.70 Ratings
Landing pages9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
A/B testing3.20 Ratings00 Ratings
Mobile optimization6.20 Ratings6.30 Ratings
Email deliverability reporting9.60 Ratings7.10 Ratings
List management8.60 Ratings7.80 Ratings
Triggered drip sequences8.80 Ratings8.20 Ratings
Lead Management
Comparison of Lead Management features of Product A and Product B
Leadfwd
8.0
Ratings
2% above category average
WebEngage
6.1
Ratings
25% below category average
Lead nurturing automation8.40 Ratings6.60 Ratings
Lead scoring and grading7.30 Ratings00 Ratings
Data quality management7.70 Ratings00 Ratings
Automated sales alerts and tasks8.50 Ratings5.60 Ratings
Campaign Management
Comparison of Campaign Management features of Product A and Product B
Leadfwd
7.0
Ratings
6% below category average
WebEngage
6.9
Ratings
7% below category average
Calendaring5.00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Event/webinar marketing9.00 Ratings5.70 Ratings
Social Media Marketing
Comparison of Social Media Marketing features of Product A and Product B
Leadfwd
7.5
Ratings
2% above category average
WebEngage
-
Ratings
Social sharing and campaigns9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Social profile integration6.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Leadfwd
6.3
Ratings
15% below category average
WebEngage
7.2
Ratings
2% below category average
Dashboards6.50 Ratings7.50 Ratings
Standard reports6.30 Ratings7.50 Ratings
Custom reports6.00 Ratings6.70 Ratings
Platform & Infrastructure
Comparison of Platform & Infrastructure features of Product A and Product B
Leadfwd
9.1
Ratings
20% above category average
WebEngage
7.1
Ratings
5% below category average
Role-based workflow & approvals8.80 Ratings7.10 Ratings
Customizability7.90 Ratings6.80 Ratings
Integration with Salesforce.com10.00 Ratings6.10 Ratings
Integration with SugarCRM9.60 Ratings00 Ratings
API00 Ratings8.20 Ratings
Best Alternatives
LeadfwdWebEngage
Small Businesses
Vbout
Vbout
Score 9.9 out of 10
Vbout
Vbout
Score 9.9 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
PFL Direct Mail Platform
PFL Direct Mail Platform
Score 9.0 out of 10
PFL Direct Mail Platform
PFL Direct Mail Platform
Score 9.0 out of 10
Enterprises
PFL Direct Mail Platform
PFL Direct Mail Platform
Score 9.0 out of 10
PFL Direct Mail Platform
PFL Direct Mail Platform
Score 9.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
LeadfwdWebEngage
Likelihood to Recommend
8.2
(0 ratings)
7.3
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
LeadfwdWebEngage
Likelihood to Recommend
It's a great choice for users of SugarCRM, which doesn't integrate particularly well with many other marketing automation platforms. It's less appropriate for users of other CRMs (particularly Salesforce) which has well-baked connectors for HubSpot, Pardot, et al.
Read full review
When the business is expected to scale and expand, tools such as this proves very handy where it helps to target the correct segments or correct audiences with the right offerings, thereby increasing the chances of transaction or desired action from the user while saving pennies which could have been burnt if a blanket approach would have been used. Automation saves a lot of time and effort for the marketers and businesses boosted due to its operation.
Read full review
Pros
  • SugarCRM integration
  • Ease of building workflows
  • Responsive, helpful support team
Read full review
  • Ease in creating user journeys.
  • Easy implementation of APIs.
  • Good reporting dashboard and scheduling features.
  • Segmentation of the users is easy.
Read full review
Cons
  • Inbox25 is in a growth phase and has transformed their product pretty fast. With that comes an increased need to continually learn how to leverage new features.
  • Tutorials and product documentation exist but it is relatively minimal. They overcome this with personalized, one-on-one training that is recorded for future review using a project management platform.
  • Inbox25 has expanded beyond Sugar CRM to include Salesforce.com integration. I'm not sure if they plan to add integrations to other applications but they are positioned well for growth.
Read full review
  • Relays
  • Onsite should have more options of templates.
  • Backend support for better reachability of the channels.
  • Cohort studies should be more customizable.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
We found Inbox25 to be the most cost-effective marketing automation platform with the best possible integration to Sugar CRM. We evaluated three additional products. Only one was comparable in scope and integration but the cost was 30% more.
Read full review
WebEngage's dashboard is relatively more intuitive and easy to understand. Further in terms of cost as well it is value to money as it delivers excellent ROI. The after-sales support is also better in terms of responsiveness and helps in case of issues with the execution of campaigns. The account managers also ideate and help in the optimization and creation of new user journeys.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • We have successfully moved cold suspects to leads and leads to opportunities, and opportunities to customers with Inbox25. We are just now starting to realize more value given that we've only recently started using the more advanced drip marketing and lead scoring features.
  • When we used the pay-as-you-go version we were paying just pennies per email and remained CAN-Spam Act compliant. It was harder to quantify the ROI then but it was apparent that email marketing was working and moving prospects from one sales stage to another. It was also very useful for re-engaging prospects and promoting products and services to customers.
  • Our total investment in the advanced edition is less $30,000 annually and we expect the ROI to be less than one year. It could have been sooner if we'd have been more thoughtful in our initial implementation.
Read full review
  • Helped in lowering cost of marketing.
  • Driving higher volume of Direct Sales.
  • Increasing conversion rate on the website.
  • Increasing lead to sale ratio.
Read full review
ScreenShots

WebEngage Screenshots

Screenshot of Webengage dashboard - User AnalyticsScreenshot of Webenagge dashboard - User DetailsScreenshot of Webengage dashboard - Creating Mobile notificationsScreenshot of Webengage dashboard - Creating EmailsScreenshot of Webengage Dashboard - Journey DesignerScreenshot of Webengage Dashboard - Journey Designer (2)