Leadfwd, from the company of the same name in Staten Island, combines B2B Prospecting, Sales Outreach and Account-Based Marketing. It replaces the former INBOX25.
N/A
WebEngage
Score 4.4 out of 10
N/A
WebEngage calls itself a multi-channel user engagement platform. It automates communication across a user's lifecycle and helps companies send messages via these channels:
Web Messages
In-app Messages
Push Notifications Web Push Notification
Email Marketing
SMS Marketing Facebook Remarketing According to the vendor, cross-device tracking helps keep communication coherent and contextual, making the…
N/A
Pricing
Leadfwd
WebEngage
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Leadfwd
WebEngage
Free Trial
No
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
No
Yes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
Yes
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
Pricing is customised according to the customer usage and requirement. Contact support@webengage.com to know more about pricing plans.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Leadfwd
WebEngage
Features
Leadfwd
WebEngage
Email & Online Marketing
Comparison of Email & Online Marketing features of Product A and Product B
Leadfwd
7.4
2 Ratings
3% below category average
WebEngage
7.4
6 Ratings
3% below category average
WYSIWYG email editor
7.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Dynamic content
7.01 Ratings
7.36 Ratings
Ability to test dynamic content
7.01 Ratings
7.76 Ratings
Landing pages
9.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
A/B testing
3.22 Ratings
00 Ratings
Mobile optimization
6.22 Ratings
6.35 Ratings
Email deliverability reporting
9.62 Ratings
7.16 Ratings
List management
8.62 Ratings
7.86 Ratings
Triggered drip sequences
8.82 Ratings
8.26 Ratings
Lead Management
Comparison of Lead Management features of Product A and Product B
Leadfwd
8.0
2 Ratings
2% above category average
WebEngage
6.1
5 Ratings
25% below category average
Lead nurturing automation
8.42 Ratings
6.65 Ratings
Lead scoring and grading
7.32 Ratings
00 Ratings
Data quality management
7.72 Ratings
00 Ratings
Automated sales alerts and tasks
8.52 Ratings
5.65 Ratings
Campaign Management
Comparison of Campaign Management features of Product A and Product B
Leadfwd
7.0
1 Ratings
6% below category average
WebEngage
6.9
6 Ratings
7% below category average
Calendaring
5.01 Ratings
8.05 Ratings
Event/webinar marketing
9.01 Ratings
5.74 Ratings
Social Media Marketing
Comparison of Social Media Marketing features of Product A and Product B
Leadfwd
7.5
1 Ratings
2% above category average
WebEngage
-
Ratings
Social sharing and campaigns
9.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Social profile integration
6.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Leadfwd
6.3
2 Ratings
15% below category average
WebEngage
7.2
6 Ratings
2% below category average
Dashboards
6.52 Ratings
7.56 Ratings
Standard reports
6.32 Ratings
7.56 Ratings
Custom reports
6.01 Ratings
6.76 Ratings
Platform & Infrastructure
Comparison of Platform & Infrastructure features of Product A and Product B
I think Inbox25 is a great fit for companies outgrowing lower-end, disconnected email marketing applications. Companies with a more formalized marketing organization that send a lot of emails (tens of thousands monthly or more) will be better served with a product like Inbox25 that is less complex, easier to use, and much more affordable (30% lower by our experience) from the larger marketing automation products on the market. Our company has 3 full-time marketing staff with over 100,000 contacts (with valid emails) that we target in various direct and drip email campaigns and Inbox25 fits our needs just fine. I suspect that we may outgrow the product eventually but I think it'll meet our needs just fine for many years to come.
WebEngage can easily reduce turnaround time for product and marketing teams to execute marketing campaigns for specific user segments as well as remove any dependency on internal tech teams for the development and maintenance of automation journeys. Further, A/B tests can be executed to measure the performance of message variants in real-time directly from the panel. But WebEngage lacks a robust Analytics platform. While basic metrics such as open rate and click-through rate for messages being sent can be considered for reporting, attribution is still not the strongest suit in case the marketing team relies on multiple Ad networks for acquisition. Thus, as per experience, it's better to use the automation suite offered by WebEngage with a different data analytics platform.
Inbox25 is in a growth phase and has transformed their product pretty fast. With that comes an increased need to continually learn how to leverage new features.
Tutorials and product documentation exist but it is relatively minimal. They overcome this with personalized, one-on-one training that is recorded for future review using a project management platform.
Inbox25 has expanded beyond Sugar CRM to include Salesforce.com integration. I'm not sure if they plan to add integrations to other applications but they are positioned well for growth.
WebEngage's dashboard is relatively more intuitive and easy to understand. Further in terms of cost as well it is value to money as it delivers excellent ROI. The after-sales support is also better in terms of responsiveness and helps in case of issues with the execution of campaigns. The account managers also ideate and help in the optimization and creation of new user journeys.
We have successfully moved cold suspects to leads and leads to opportunities, and opportunities to customers with Inbox25. We are just now starting to realize more value given that we've only recently started using the more advanced drip marketing and lead scoring features.
When we used the pay-as-you-go version we were paying just pennies per email and remained CAN-Spam Act compliant. It was harder to quantify the ROI then but it was apparent that email marketing was working and moving prospects from one sales stage to another. It was also very useful for re-engaging prospects and promoting products and services to customers.
Our total investment in the advanced edition is less $30,000 annually and we expect the ROI to be less than one year. It could have been sooner if we'd have been more thoughtful in our initial implementation.