LiftIgniter Real-time Personalization Platform vs. SAP Service Cloud

LiftIgniter is well suited for:

• Media companies without the resources to develop their own content recommendations systems.
• eCommerce companies who want to get product recommendations live onsite quickly.

LiftIgniter is less appropriate:

• Organizations with a shallow content set onsite.

Overall, SAP Service Cloud has a core set of functionality in which it performs well. Enterprise-level structured data collection, case categorisation, and single-channel case handling are very effective, and a good volume of service cases should fit within these parameters. When moving to more customised, atypical, or even just variant processes, however, configuration and streamlining of the system can quickly become very complex, costly, and/or not possible in its present form. Additionally, a very large volume of data is required to train any ML/AI models, so new and small customers will not benefit from these enhancements.

Incentivized

• It does a good job recommending content that is related to the current story a user is on.
• It does a good job not recommending content the user has already viewed.
• It does a good job being a recommendation engine for disparate sites with related content.

• First is It is highly effective when we consider Customer Relation Engagement.
• Good User Interface by which anyone can get used to it quickly.
• It is providing infinite opportunity of integration with other SAP solutions.
• Affordable Solutions with effective features.
• It has prebuilt charts which helps us to define customer journey with ease of efforts.

Incentivized

• Manually controlling certain undesired results is not straight forward and seems to often result in a lower CTR or conversion rates.
• The LI Dashboard has limited features.

• While SAP Service Cloud offers a wealth of features, its interface can sometimes feel overwhelming. For newcomers, especially those not tech-savvy, a more intuitive or simplified layout would be beneficial.
• While it allows for some level of personalization, making deep customizations can be challenging. Given the unique requirements of our client's customer service, having more flexibility in tailoring the tool to our exact needs would be nice.
• While SAP Service Cloud integrates well within the SAP ecosystem, it can sometimes be less smooth when linking up with non-SAP third-party tools. Enhancing these integrations would streamline our operations, especially when using other software tools alongside it.

Incentivized

Now all our critical processes are streamlined & would like to explore the new feature to have user friendly experiences

Incentivized

I have found that sometimes issues reported to the SAP takes more time also they lack system support with respect to the priority . Also we don't see RCA for the issues raised. Also turn around time for the issues is not fixed as the support is global sometimes the issues float here and there.

Incentivized

It's the best. Our only other option was rolling out our own and LiftIgniter was easier to implement and performed better for related content.

We went with SAP Service Cloud instead of Oracle Cloud Platform because it is like a custom-made tool for big companies, seamlessly working with our other systems. It helps us manage complex tasks and customer interactions better, making everything smoother and more efficient. It just fits well with how we do things.

Incentivized

• Increased time on site
• Decreased bounce rate
• 5-15% CTR for users which saw recommendations

• can help speed up issue resolution, reducing the time customers spend waiting for solutions
• AI insights help predict the customer profile, satisfaction, and possible options for service resolutions
• One stop for all historical customer service requests and data and useful to calculate who are high CLTV customers

Incentivized