Litera Kira vs. Relativity

Kira is a great due diligence tool and can be well utilised on both large and small transactions. It also has good application if you are looking to compare multiple documents against a model form document or market standard templates. Kira is less useful if you are looking to review emails (e.g. as part of a disclosure exercise); or if your review involves non-Latin based script languages.

Relativity is well suited for all the eDiscovery workflows. It's excellent for document review, coding, active learning, content and structured analytics, searches, persistent highlights, imaging, and burning redactions into productions. The error rates with processing in Relativity are a little compared to other eDiscovery processing tools in the market. It is solely for document review purposes legal scenarios or otherwise, but it is not a complete solution for building customized hosting nor neither it is a replacement for conventional websites.

Incentivized

• Good for quickly getting to the relevant part of the document in the English language, the smartfields are accurate.
• Handles large scale review well with an excellent UI and helpful project management features.
• Cloud-based platform handles multiple simultaneous reviewers efficiently and easily.
• Ability to self-train smart fields is a definite advantage.

Incentivized

• Can scale to support a review of a large number of documents and reviewers and/or large number of cases
• Can be customized to support a variety of different workflows and integration with 3rd party tools and external processes and scripting of different fields
• Very secure. Can be enabled to run 2 factor authentication

Incentivized

• Finding that many contracts aren't that 'standard' and if not standard, it is impossible to find enough examples to train with
• Many contracts have handwritten data, especially the key terms that it cannot read.
• Sometimes the contracts have attachments with important terms, we find that harder to train.

Incentivized

• Very powerful tool, but does require a high level of expertise and head count to administer the product.
• If hosting yourself, requires investment in servers and ideally is housed in a data center
• Providers need to pay kCura a monthly user license fee for every user who has access to the tool. Providers can purchase blocks of users, but with a large amount of users on a case, it's cost that some external clients are not thrilled about

Incentivized

If our firm had more contracts in English, the usability of Kira would be rated higher. However, since we have to train clauses in Portuguese in order to use Kira, it makes its usability lower. We still are not able to fully use Kira for reading contracts in Portuguese. It takes a long time and many associate hours to make Kira usable in other languages.

Incentivized

Relativity is a well established tool that continues to evolve and look for ways to improve. Particular focus on Australian workflows is very promising for us and appreciated. There is a lot of scope for improvement in the processing and PDF workflows but it is great to see Relativity being proactive in those areas

Incentivized

There was an email sent out with technical questions that was not attended to. However, Kira support has been good in general in that emails are well attended to overall, the Kira support portal is great and regular meetings are held.

Incentivized

We initially chose Kira because of the Quick Study feature and because we trust Noah. We've since evaluated Diligen--its features have grown substantially over the past year. We've also tried ContraxSuite, LawGeex, Evisort, Luminance, eBrevia, Heretik, Blackboiler, and many others. It all comes down to the cost + feature set. We will always go with the lowest cost provider with the widest needed feature set (assuming there are no accuracy or performance issues during the pilot).

Incentivized

Its having very good scalability options. You can avoid in house purchase of the relativity infra with the use of relativity one. Very good analytics features its having.

Incentivized

• When trained to read bespoke types of documents, the accuracy can be very good and the consequential time savings very high. In this scenario we have reduced the average time of review of one type of client documents from over an hour to 15 minutes.

Incentivized

• Saves time spent searching for documents and native files.
• Easy to download materials when needed.
• Can share collections of materials across team members in other offices.

Incentivized