LMS365 vs. Qstream

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
LMS365
Score 7.9 out of 10
N/A
ELEARNINGFORCE in Edgewater brings learning management to Office 365 and SharePoint. LMS365 blends with the Microsoft infrastructure and is designed to eliminate expensive integration, time-consuming development, and unwanted complexity. Learners access learning plans, courses, personal progress reports, and certificates from within the SharePoint business process.N/A
Qstream
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
Qstream headquartered in Burlington, Massachusetts offers their eponymous sales enablement application.N/A
Pricing
LMS365Qstream
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
LMS365Qstream
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
LMS365Qstream
Features
LMS365Qstream
Learning Management
Comparison of Learning Management features of Product A and Product B
LMS365
7.9
4 Ratings
4% below category average
Qstream
-
Ratings
Course authoring5.83 Ratings00 Ratings
Course catalog or library6.74 Ratings00 Ratings
Player/Portal7.24 Ratings00 Ratings
Learning content6.74 Ratings00 Ratings
Mobile friendly7.72 Ratings00 Ratings
Progress tracking & certifications9.14 Ratings00 Ratings
Assignments8.64 Ratings00 Ratings
Compliance management9.54 Ratings00 Ratings
Learning administration10.04 Ratings00 Ratings
Learning reporting & analytics5.94 Ratings00 Ratings
Social learning6.73 Ratings00 Ratings
Gamification9.12 Ratings00 Ratings
Single Sign On (SSO) Enabled Learning10.02 Ratings00 Ratings
Sales Gamification
Comparison of Sales Gamification features of Product A and Product B
LMS365
-
Ratings
Qstream
7.3
1 Ratings
6% below category average
Sales contest templates00 Ratings8.01 Ratings
Custom sales contests00 Ratings5.01 Ratings
Team competitions00 Ratings8.01 Ratings
Contest flexibility00 Ratings6.01 Ratings
Sales rep view00 Ratings8.01 Ratings
Game notifications & updates00 Ratings7.01 Ratings
Social competition / Game collaboration00 Ratings8.01 Ratings
Sales performance reporting00 Ratings8.01 Ratings
Best Alternatives
LMS365Qstream
Small Businesses
iSpring LMS
iSpring LMS
Score 9.5 out of 10

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
iSpring LMS
iSpring LMS
Score 9.5 out of 10
Everstage
Everstage
Score 9.2 out of 10
Enterprises
Axonify
Axonify
Score 10.0 out of 10
Everstage
Everstage
Score 9.2 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
LMS365Qstream
Likelihood to Recommend
9.1
(6 ratings)
7.0
(1 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
8.2
(2 ratings)
6.0
(1 ratings)
Usability
8.6
(2 ratings)
7.0
(1 ratings)
Support Rating
10.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
LMS365Qstream
Likelihood to Recommend
Elearningforce
If a customer does not have SharePoint the entry in that kind of solution is a bit harder as the use of SharePoint can be so broad. It does not mean it is not the right solution as a company can use SharePoint LMS to start with and then expand to other functions and features. I strongly recommend to use SharePoint Standard or Enterprise and forgo the "free" SharePoint version as a) SharePoint's core functions and features are greatly enhanced in these two premium versions and b) more and more SharePoint LMS functions make use of these core Standard and Enterprise features in the future, like taxonomy, user profiles, etc. In general with all project it is as well recommended to have the full buy in by upper management and that the project initiative is fully supported. Adding such a solution (SharePoint LMS or any other LMS solution) will require the team not only to have a good plan on how the requirements can be achieved from a technical point of view, but how a training program can be rolled out to an organization of 5, 500, 5.000 or 50.000. The technical deployment of SharePoint LMS is measurable (I would say between 1-4 weeks based on the complexity, scale of the environment). 1-2 weeks of training (depending on the base knowledge of SharePoint in the company and the need to add knowledge of SharePoint LMS). That's it. Technically you are ready. If needed, any custom work, integration and development work comes on top. Where customer struggle is the availability and dedication of their own teams. Course content needs to be created, how should a course look like, what are the parameters, what are top ten things needed moving a course which was taught in a class room, but now to be delivered online. Buying the licenses is one thing, getting the solution up and running form a technical point of view is another, making it YOURS is the challenge!
Read full review
Qstream
Qstream is great when used for reinforcement of training conducted. Especially when that training is detailed or complex, Qstream will help to embed key concepts and drive adoption while ensuring reps are interacting.
Read full review
Pros
Elearningforce
  • Creating an easy to navigate Course Catalog
  • Enabling the training team to assign training easily and send out email reminders.
  • Create sample training in the Sandbox to test thoughts and ideas.
Read full review
Qstream
  • Gamification: gets reps involved in ways that keep it interesting while bringing in elements of competition.
  • Mobile: ease of use and direct access to reps while on the move. The interface is intuitive and able to be interacted with in quick increments rather than lengthy elearning.
  • Coaching: provides direct insights into who is coping and who is not so that enablement efforts can be focused.
Read full review
Cons
Elearningforce
  • Clarify the process for enrollment into courses
  • When the user clicks into a different portion of the file library and then needs to return to a previous class the software forces you to go all the way back to the beginning of the coursework, this isn’t that painful just annoying.
Read full review
Qstream
  • Reporting: we only had access to some of the reports so would have liked to see more detail and have the ability to create custom reports.
  • Licensing: we accessed qstream via Growthplay so only had access to limited features. Would like to see this extended so that we could truly experience all of the qstream benefits.
  • Content Creation: we were not able to create our own questions and streams but had to rely on the external team. Self-creation and self-directed streams would have been preferable.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Elearningforce
It is very simple for me: As I said, I am (we are) selling and consulting around SharePoint LMS. SharePoint LMS is a killer application which needs to be in every company which has a vision and mission to deliver and create knowledge. So you can say Thomas (me) is biased, but I only encourage you to check out the solution to hear what we have to say and stack our solution against the other solutions out there.
Read full review
Qstream
Qstream is good in terms of gamification and driving adoption. However we are looking for a platform that supports content creation, ILT training as well as gamification. Qstream would meet only one of those criteria. We may still use them again if we are unable to find a compete platform in future
Read full review
Usability
Elearningforce
Ultimately, in my opinion LMS365 is a bit clunky to use. It has most of the features you need, but most need to be configured by your technology department, e.g., SSO, user groups in Entra ID, notifications through Slack, teams, etc. If you're looking for an all-in-one solution, look elsewhere, as lms365 has several catches to its proposition.
Read full review
Qstream
Qstream was easy for us to use and gain insights from. Feedback from sales leaders and reps was generally positive. Having greater flexibility about creating custom reports and streams would have increased the rating
Read full review
Support Rating
Elearningforce
The few times we actually needed support generally were during major upgrades of the system and getting a quick handle on how the configuration changed were the primary reasons.
Read full review
Qstream
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Elearningforce
I will pick EdApp or Totara if you're after an all-in-one LMS solution that is feature-rich. For a university educational setting, Moodle continues to make sense. Safety Culture now owns EdApp, so over time, these platforms will likely be merged. LMS needs a huge overhaul to catch up.
Read full review
Qstream
Qstream was selected by default because it was offered by Growthplay as their preferred gamification and adoption tool. We have subsequently looked at acquiring Qstream for other initiatives and are in the process of evaluating options
Read full review
Return on Investment
Elearningforce
  • It will reduce the time
  • We can speed up the work
  • There are more advantages in any part of the organisation
Read full review
Qstream
  • Reps have adopted our new sales methodology quicker and with more rigour meaning we are more successful in the field.
  • We’ve been able to create scale to drive adoption. Without technologies like Qstream, we would never be able to meet our enablement and growth targets.
  • More reps talking a consistent message means our customer experience has improved at the sales front. This allows us to differentiate versus the competition and ensures we win more often.
Read full review
ScreenShots