TrustRadius
Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
mabl
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
mabl is a regression test automation tool with test output visualization and performance regression for tracking the perceived speed of web apps and sites, from the company of the same name in Boston.N/A
Playwright
Score 8.7 out of 10
N/A
A cross-browser testing tool, playwright supports all modern rendering engines including Chromium, WebKit, and Firefox. Users can test on Windows, Linux, and macOS, locally or on CI, headless or headed. It is also cross-language, so that the Playwright API can be used in TypeScript, JavaScript, Python, .NET, Java. Test Mobile Web. Native mobile emulation of Google Chrome for Android and Mobile Safari. The same rendering engine works on the Desktop and in the Cloud. Playright…N/A
Tricentis Tosca
Score 8.8 out of 10
N/A
Tricentis Tosca provides an approach to test automation that is AI-powered, codeless, and end-to-end so it can test everything in a complex IT landscape, to ensure business processes work flawlessly no matter where changes occurs. Its 160+ technology support helps users test everything at the UI, API and data layer, including virtually any enterprise, custom, homegrown and mobile application. With its model-based approach, Tosca enables business, QA and IT teams to…N/A
Pricing
mablPlaywrightTricentis Tosca
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
mablPlaywrightTricentis Tosca
Free Trial
YesNoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup feeOptional
Additional Details———
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
mablPlaywrightTricentis Tosca
Considered Multiple Products
mabl
LK
Lisa Krol
Quality Assurance Engineer
Chose mabl
We ultimately selected mabl cause it most met our needs and our budget. We needed a low code UI automation test tool. We also have a suite of existing testing tools and other tools that it needed to be able to integrate with. Price was the only thing that ruled out some of the …
Playwright
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose Playwright
We selected Playwright over the rest for several reasons. The learning curve is faster, making it easier for our team to get up to speed quickly. The setup is pretty straithtforwared, minimal configurartion needed and a great example included in the configuration which includes …
Tricentis Tosca
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose Tricentis Tosca
Compared to Selenium, Cypress, and Playwright, Tricentis Tosca stands out with its model-based approach and low-code automation, making it easier for non-developers to create and maintain tests. While Selenium, Cypress, and Playwright offer more flexibility and are …
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose Tricentis Tosca
Again, end users do not select Tosca. The decision making that leads to purchasing an expensive tool is generally done at a different level.
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose Tricentis Tosca
Cutting across all the phases and areas of testing Tricentis stack helped address all the challenges that were reported by the test process optimization performed by one of our vendors. Tricentis qtest for test management, Tosca for test automation, and Neoload for test …
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose Tricentis Tosca
When evaluating automation tools such as Selenium, Playwright, Cypress, UFT, Worksoft, and others, Tricentis Tosca stands out in four major areas: enterprise scale, SAP automation, maintenance effort, and end‑to‑end coverage.
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose Tricentis Tosca
qTest is the "brain" of the suite. You can use just Tricentis Tosca and can be enough to have results, but if you want have the management of executions, results and even manual test, this is your app.
Chose Tricentis Tosca
There are several low-code/no-code tools available for GUI testing, such as UI Path and Eggplant. However, based on my experience, Tosca stands out as the most user-friendly option. It allows testers to quickly build and execute automated GUI tests with minimal setup, making it …
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose Tricentis Tosca
User friendly interface is key to any tool usage. If the features supported by tool is enormous but the interface is not easy to use, then the product will not reach its optimal usage. Tosca scores high numbers with this regard. The documentations and KB articles it supports …
juan eng paw | TrustRadius Reviewer
juan eng paw
Senior Technical Manager SA
Chose Tricentis Tosca
UFT was mostly record and replay and Tricentis Tosca best fit our purpose as it was easier to create modules and make quick changes when needed. Overall easier and quicker to make changes to our existing test cases. therefore we haven't used UFT anymore.
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose Tricentis Tosca
Tricentis Tosca has higher stability than Certica Solutions
Yogendra Singh | TrustRadius Reviewer
Yogendra Singh
Test Automation Expert
Chose Tricentis Tosca
As Tricentis Tosca is one of the first tools to implement the model based test automation, it is way ahead of the similar kind of tools. be it creating and innovating new strategies to overcome the existing hurdles faced during automation like, self healing feature is quite …
Chose Tricentis Tosca
Even though selenium is open source tool we have lot restriction in selenium. Using selenium we can automate only web based application. If we need to automate other application we work with other tools. Maintenance of Selenium code is complex when compare to Tricentis Tosca. …
Anant Joshi | TrustRadius Reviewer
Anant Joshi
Sr. Director
Chose Tricentis Tosca
The overall user experience and the ease of use while automation ERP system was better in Tricentis Tosca. The integration was seamless especially for SAP and SFDC system. I think the maintenance efforts required in Tricentis Tosca is very less as compared to Katalon. The …
Sneha Gangan Manore | TrustRadius Reviewer
Sneha Gangan Manore
Senior Analyst
Chose Tricentis Tosca
This tool covers all from functional testing to rpa and mobile testing cloud based testing visual testing and accessibility testing is easily possible. It is easy to implement start work in less time. All the testing kinds performance can also be tested and customized reports …
Ganesh Muralidharan | TrustRadius Reviewer
Ganesh Muralidharan
Global Delivery Head
Chose Tricentis Tosca
Micro Focus UFT requires coding skills. Worksoft supports SAP very well but web app automation was challenging. Provar is only for Salesforce automation. Selenium required an automation engineer with Java knowledge and framework dependency. Tricentis Tosca did not require any …
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose Tricentis Tosca
Good on flexibility and provided much option to cover different aspects of automation testing.
BW
Bernd Weigl
Teamleiter Quality Assurance
Chose Tricentis Tosca
Best Module and Scan approach, Libs rule, and PL Libs are the best things ever!
Nikhil Puniyani | TrustRadius Reviewer
Nikhil Puniyani
Software Engineer
Chose Tricentis Tosca
As our product required wide rage of testing start from web testing to desktop automation also, we gone through the feature provided by Tosca and decided it will be good fit for end to end automation.
Even though from our team no one is aware of how to use the tools, the guide …
Vinayak Bandewar | TrustRadius Reviewer
Vinayak Bandewar
Test Architect
Chose Tricentis Tosca
Other tools are focused on limited applications or technologies. With Tricentis Tosca you can do almost everything which makes it one-stop solution for all needs.Tosca is codeless vs others which requires coding. Tosca has inbuilt repository which other tools lack. Tosca also …
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose Tricentis Tosca
Tricentis Tosca provides a uniform interface for al testers and avoids the requirement for coding. Tricentis Tosca also offers test capabilities across the enterprise that other tools do not.
Features
mablPlaywrightTricentis Tosca
Automation Testing
Comparison of Automation Testing features of Product A and Product B
mabl
10.0
Ratings
18% above category average
Playwright
-
Ratings
Tricentis Tosca
7.2
Ratings
15% below category average
Record and Automate10.00 Ratings00 Ratings7.40 Ratings
Multi-Browser Testing10.00 Ratings00 Ratings8.40 Ratings
Test Scheduling10.00 Ratings00 Ratings7.60 Ratings
Test Management10.00 Ratings00 Ratings8.10 Ratings
CI/CD Tool Integration10.00 Ratings00 Ratings8.20 Ratings
Object Recognition10.00 Ratings00 Ratings7.90 Ratings
Testing Reports & Analytics10.00 Ratings00 Ratings7.90 Ratings
Mobile Testing00 Ratings00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Integrated Version Control00 Ratings00 Ratings1.00 Ratings
Parallel Testing00 Ratings00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Data-Driven Testing00 Ratings00 Ratings7.90 Ratings
Real Device Testing00 Ratings00 Ratings7.60 Ratings
Best Alternatives
mablPlaywrightTricentis Tosca
Small Businesses
BrowserStack
BrowserStack
Score 8.4 out of 10
BrowserStack
BrowserStack
Score 8.4 out of 10
BrowserStack
BrowserStack
Score 8.4 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
ReadyAPI
ReadyAPI
Score 6.1 out of 10
BrowserStack
BrowserStack
Score 8.4 out of 10
ReadyAPI
ReadyAPI
Score 6.1 out of 10
Enterprises
ignio AIOps
ignio AIOps
Score 8.1 out of 10
BrowserStack
BrowserStack
Score 8.4 out of 10
ignio AIOps
ignio AIOps
Score 8.1 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
mablPlaywrightTricentis Tosca
Likelihood to Recommend
8.0
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
8.9
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
9.4
(0 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
8.6
(0 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
In-Person Training
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Configurability
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
mablPlaywrightTricentis Tosca
Likelihood to Recommend
We haven't found a scenario yet where it hasn't been appropriate. We did have one function on our application that mabl couldn't do, but they solved it and got back to us very quickly. Our application is web-based and mabl is able to handle this very easily. We use the command line runner a lot. Being able to easily and quickly change from a cloud based run to a local run has been fantastic. Setting up flows and environments is a wonderful feature
LK
Lisa Krol
Quality Assurance Engineer
Read full review
Playwright is very well suited for any kind of frontend QA regression testing. It's perfect for ensuring that important features that are not often updated remain fully functional across updates or releases. It is not well suited for testing a feature that requires more developer updates before it is ready for end users. Playwright tests are not always simple to maintain if frequent updates are required to keep them relevant. Playwright can be used for API or database assertions as well, but it's not necessarily best suited for those scenarios. It does perform well enough to consider that use case for simplicity if Playwright is already relevant for any frontend QA regression tests that are needed.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
I still love to test some desktop applications as well as API's with Tosca. For web applications Tosca is OK but there are better alternatives. As a user, Tosca is really great to work with as you can set up a clean project quite fast. It is also quite easy to make a mess as a non-experienced user, using configurations (but in the wrong way), using TCD (but in the wrong way). It would help if there was more focus on generic test automation fundamentals, many more clear examples and instead of just mentioning the best practices, make users really understand the best practices so they know how and when to (not) apply them.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Pros
  • mabl trainer - record and play back test cases
  • Organization - labels and flows make this easy
  • Customer support!
LK
Lisa Krol
Quality Assurance Engineer
Read full review
  • UI Regression Testing
  • QA Automation
  • CI/CD Integration
  • Test Result Report configuration
  • Reliable test framework
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
  • It's one stop shop for all your test automation needs like - api layer, ui layer, load testing, mobile automation.
  • It has excellent support for CI/CD and Devops environment which makes it very modern but much needed solution
  • It can run in cross browser and cross devices with same test script and again saves a lot of time.
  • Excellent results and dashboards gives nice view into results.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Cons
  • Asserts could be easier to add, but they aren't terribly hard
LK
Lisa Krol
Quality Assurance Engineer
Read full review
  • bigger adoption
  • mobile testing
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
  • Documentation - struggled multiple times with features not explained very well, or not explained at all
  • The only support is on Tricentis Forums, where, sometimes, based on 'luck' - you will open a support case, and wait few days until you get the chance to speak with someone from Tricentis and show case your issue
AI
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Tricentis Tosca has consistently delivered value through its model‑based, low‑code automation, strong SAP ECC/S/4HANA and Fiori support, and the ability to reuse test assets across regression, upgrades, and transformation projects. Its coverage across SAP, Web, APIs, and desktop within a single platform reduces tool sprawl and maintenance effort, while features like risk‑based testing, CI/CD integration, and business‑readable tests align well with our quality and release goals
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Usability
No answers on this topic
I find Playwright very intuitive and generally do not have any trouble using it on a daily basis. However, I do have coworkers with more limited experience in software who have struggled immensely in learning to use Playwright properly. Playwright is very well documented which helps if you plan to use AI to help you write any test automation (which I generally don't recommend, but is an option).
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
It can be a challenge for new users who have never used an automation tool. For example, it is hard to understand the layout of the screen and where to find how to update the data. The interface can be overwhelming at first.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Support Rating
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Tricentis team was very supportive. Support is expensive but they helped us at many level. Setting up timeline, implementation, precise questions on automation challenges. We had an account manager and technical people we could as to talk to. Support was generally timely and helping. They often proposed to come on site to help us which would cost more but could be helpful
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
In-Person Training
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
It would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterif the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterif the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterif the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterif the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterif the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterif the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterif the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterif the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterif the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterif the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterif the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterif the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterif the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterif the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterif the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterif the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterif the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterif the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterif the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is better
david leo | TrustRadius Reviewer
david leo
Developer
Read full review
Online Training
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
okIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is better
david leo | TrustRadius Reviewer
david leo
Developer
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
We ultimately selected mabl cause it most met our needs and our budget. We needed a low code UI automation test tool. We also have a suite of existing testing tools and other tools that it needed to be able to integrate with. Price was the only thing that ruled out some of the above tools, we are a small start up, and don't have a huge budget. Some tools listed didn't have the same functionality or ease of use with the record and playback. mabl works on our machines and integrates with our existing tools
LK
Lisa Krol
Quality Assurance Engineer
Read full review
We selected Playwright over the rest for several reasons. The learning curve is faster, making it easier for our team to get up to speed quickly. The setup is pretty straithtforwared, minimal configurartion needed and a great example included in the configuration which includes all the basics to start writing using that spec as a placeholder. Compared to Cypress, Playwright support multiple browsers out of the box, giving us broader testing coverage. Appium is great for mobile testing, but extremely slow.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
User friendly interface is key to any tool usage. If the features supported by tool is enormous but the interface is not easy to use, then the product will not reach its optimal usage. Tosca scores high numbers with this regard. The documentations and KB articles it supports are very helpful and allows us to solve our issues independently.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • We are able to more quickly automate UI tests
LK
Lisa Krol
Quality Assurance Engineer
Read full review
  • Usable
  • customisable
  • extendable
david leo | TrustRadius Reviewer
david leo
Developer
Read full review
  • Faster testing cycles - We were able to run around 4000 test cases in a week for a large workday implementation for multiple cycles.
  • Increased risk coverage - We were able to increase regression coverage to 70% from scratch.
  • Increased automation rates - High number of automation rates were achieved.
Vinayak Bandewar | TrustRadius Reviewer
Vinayak Bandewar
Test Architect
Read full review
ScreenShots

mabl Screenshots

Screenshot of Testing the login flow of the Freshbooks web application. Each test step is created by interacting with your application and is recorded in the mabl Trainer.Screenshot of Parameterized JavaScript enables everyone to contribute to building automated tests.Screenshot of View of mabl's insights and reporting. In this view, we're looking at mabl's release coverage dashboard, which includes passing rate, quality metrics, and more.Screenshot of Quickly create Jira tickets directly from test failures. All of the test execution data will be automatically pulled into the issue in Jira.Screenshot of Setting up a test as a part of your workflow in GitHub Actions.

Tricentis Tosca Screenshots

Screenshot of where no-code, model-based test automation separates the technical information of an application into reusable, no-code modules that can be updated as applications change, which auto-updates test cases.Screenshot of a test case design for risk optimization - this displays a flexible testing model that enables fast, easy test case creation and maintenance and reduces risk in app releases.Screenshot of requirements coverage for risk optimization - this enables users to prioritize requirements by business risk/ impact, understand what is needed to test, and gain business insight on defects to ensure smarter and faster release decisions.Screenshot of Vision AI - AI powered test automation using patented neural network technology to deliver resilient UI automation. Includes self-healing AI capabilities.Screenshot of service virtualization, which enables users to build realistic, simulated services in minutes to remove bottlenecks and run end-to-end tests faster in the software development lifecycle.Screenshot of test data management. This offers test data when it is needed and helps keep track of the data as it gets consumed across end-to-end business processes.