Palo Alto Networks Next-Generation Firewalls - PA Series vs. Skyhigh Secure Web Gateway

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Palo Alto Networks Next-Generation Firewalls - PA Series
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
Palo Alto Network’s Next-Generation Firewalls is a firewall option integrated with other Palo Alto security products. Released in late 2023, the PA-7500 ML-Powered NextGeneration Firewall (NGFW) enables enterprise-scale organizations and service providers to deploy security in high-performance environments.
$1.50
per hour per available zone
Skyhigh Secure Web Gateway
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
Skyhigh Secure Web Gateway (replacing the former McAfee Web Gateway) is presented by the vendor as high-performance on-premises web security, that can be deployed as dedicated hardware or a virtual machine. With it, users can enforce internet-use policies, analyze the nature and intent of content and active code entering the network, and use DLP technology to scan outbound traffic.N/A
Pricing
Palo Alto Networks Next-Generation Firewalls - PA SeriesSkyhigh Secure Web Gateway
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Palo Alto Networks Next-Generation Firewalls - PA SeriesSkyhigh Secure Web Gateway
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsUsers may also choose to pay per gigabyte of data used starting at .065/GB. Note that prices listed here reflect installations via Amazon Web Services. Pricing may differ if other service providers are used.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Palo Alto Networks Next-Generation Firewalls - PA SeriesSkyhigh Secure Web Gateway
Features
Palo Alto Networks Next-Generation Firewalls - PA SeriesSkyhigh Secure Web Gateway
Firewall
Comparison of Firewall features of Product A and Product B
Palo Alto Networks Next-Generation Firewalls - PA Series
8.7
27 Ratings
0% above category average
Skyhigh Secure Web Gateway
-
Ratings
Identification Technologies9.127 Ratings00 Ratings
Visualization Tools7.626 Ratings00 Ratings
Content Inspection9.527 Ratings00 Ratings
Policy-based Controls9.727 Ratings00 Ratings
Active Directory and LDAP9.026 Ratings00 Ratings
Firewall Management Console8.827 Ratings00 Ratings
Reporting and Logging8.327 Ratings00 Ratings
VPN8.727 Ratings00 Ratings
High Availability8.826 Ratings00 Ratings
Stateful Inspection9.026 Ratings00 Ratings
Proxy Server7.413 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Palo Alto Networks Next-Generation Firewalls - PA SeriesSkyhigh Secure Web Gateway
Small Businesses
pfSense
pfSense
Score 8.8 out of 10

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
Quantum Firewalls and Security Gateways
Quantum Firewalls and Security Gateways
Score 9.3 out of 10
Quantum Firewalls and Security Gateways
Quantum Firewalls and Security Gateways
Score 9.3 out of 10
Enterprises
Palo Alto Networks Virtualized Next-Generation Firewalls - VM Series
Palo Alto Networks Virtualized Next-Generation Firewalls - VM Series
Score 9.1 out of 10
Quantum Firewalls and Security Gateways
Quantum Firewalls and Security Gateways
Score 9.3 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Palo Alto Networks Next-Generation Firewalls - PA SeriesSkyhigh Secure Web Gateway
Likelihood to Recommend
9.0
(43 ratings)
7.8
(5 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
10.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
8.5
(8 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
Support Rating
8.4
(9 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Palo Alto Networks Next-Generation Firewalls - PA SeriesSkyhigh Secure Web Gateway
Likelihood to Recommend
Palo Alto Networks
It is well-suited for a company needing strong edge security with ease of administration. It comes standard with many features such as VPN, Application ID and "Day-1 Config" that make the networks it protects secure from the very start. Palo is definitely a premium product and is much more expensive than other firewalls, but the value is realized immediately. The robust options for firewall rules/policies allow the administrator to apply security in new and creative ways to hit the sweet spot between security and usability.
Read full review
Trellix (FireEye + McAfee)
McAfee Web Gateway is best suited for all types of organizations if they wan to achieve the security for their users as it has the large intel database as well. The best part is its flexible hybrid deployment methods- it can be deployed on premises (hardware and virtual), in the cloud, or both for the high availability.
Read full review
Pros
Palo Alto Networks
  • The PA handles VPN connectivity without missing a beat. We have multiple VPN tunnels in use for redundancy to cloud-based services.
  • The PA has great functionality in supporting failover internet connections, again with the ability to have multiple paths out to our cloud-based services.
  • The PA is updated on the regular with various security updates, we are not concerned with the firewall's ability to see what packets are really flowing across the network. Being able to see beyond just IP and port requests lets you know things are locked down better than traditional firewalls.
  • It is a great overall kit, with URL filtering and other services that fill in the gaps between other solutions without breaking the bank.
Read full review
Trellix (FireEye + McAfee)
  • Great malware protection.
  • Excellent sandboxing.
  • Great URL filtering.
  • Very good pre-defined policies.
Read full review
Cons
Palo Alto Networks
  • Setting up certain things can be somewhat complicated due to the numerous options and abstractions involved.
  • It would be nice to have somewhere to get simple canned reports easily.
  • It would be nice to be able to remove options we never use from various setup dialogs.
Read full review
Trellix (FireEye + McAfee)
  • Support response
  • Better pricing
  • Best practices guides
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Palo Alto Networks
The PA5220s have far exceeded what we have expected out of them. It was a bit of a learning curve coming from another vendor, but everything falls into place now with ease. The capabilities of the solution still surprise us, allowing us to remove other costly hardware and providing a single point of management needed
Read full review
Trellix (FireEye + McAfee)
No answers on this topic
Usability
Palo Alto Networks
It can be a little tricky at first if you have never used the product or a firewall before. If you have experience with firewalls in general, it does not take long to learn the Palo Alto Networks Next-Generation Firewalls - PA Series interface. They offer great training resources and knowledge base articles to help get up to speed.
Read full review
Trellix (FireEye + McAfee)
Excellent products based on all the needs we had. Most of our use cases has been able to implement. DLP is kind of difficult to implement but possible. However you needs a big team to handle the tools as it's capabilities and management is complex. Nevertheles you can find a way to leverage all the funcionality when needed.
Read full review
Support Rating
Palo Alto Networks
We've run into a couple undocumented bugs, but that seems to happen with every brand and technology. Any time we've had to engage Palo Alto support they've always been professional, knowledgeable and prompt. In almost all cases we've been able to resolve our issues without having to escalate our tickets.
Read full review
Trellix (FireEye + McAfee)
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Palo Alto Networks
We are using Cisco ASA before in our environment but when it comes to deep scanning & layer 7 security it doesn't have that capability. After using Palo Alto Networks Next-Generation Firewall we are using sandboxing & advance malware protection that provides high-level end-user security. Also after implementing it we can easily monitor user-level traffic.
Read full review
Trellix (FireEye + McAfee)
The configuration of the Cisco Secure Web Appliance of even worse than the one of Skyhigh's Secure Web Gateway. The detecction rate was slightly higher but the visibility worse.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Palo Alto Networks
  • We used to outsource our Firewall and it's management. Not only did we find their SLA's to be lacking, in general, but communication between us was horrible. Many times we could not understand them and that resulted in less than desirable rule creation or troubleshooting.
  • Since we no longer have to pay a company for 24/7 management (and SLOW SLA's) we are saving a ton of money each year. Also our fellow employee's are much happier that things can be resolved in a timely manner.
Read full review
Trellix (FireEye + McAfee)
  • An effective tool in enforcing Internet policies.
  • Adds a necessary layer of Internet security over and above UTM Firewall offerings.
Read full review
ScreenShots