McGraw-Hill Connect vs. Pearson Revel

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
McGraw-Hill Connect
Score 8.8 out of 10
N/A
McGraw-Hill Connect is an e-learning platform offered by McGraw-Hill Education. Features include course and assignment creation, grading, learning aides, e-books, and student portals.N/A
Revel
Score 4.1 out of 10
N/A
Revel from Pearson supports students with note taking, assessments, and other classroom tasks, and integrates with commonly used LMS.N/A
Pricing
McGraw-Hill ConnectPearson Revel
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
McGraw-Hill ConnectRevel
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details——
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
McGraw-Hill ConnectPearson Revel
Considered Both Products
McGraw-Hill Connect
Chose McGraw-Hill Connect
Integration with Canvas and ease of use are the two strong points for McGraw-Hill Connect. Pearson Revel has many issues at the start of the semester and takes a long time to resolve those. McGraw-Hill Connect has never been down for the start of our semester. MindTap is not …
Chose McGraw-Hill Connect
Very similar, both advertised integration with LMS, but is only at surface level. MGH had better core content, but Pearson came with test editor. As far as physical materials, MGH had options for hard coverer textbook or single use student workbook where competitors only …
Chose McGraw-Hill Connect
McGraw-Hill provides a higher level of customer support and value me as a customer/user of their product
Revel
Chose Pearson Revel
In my opinion, McGraw-Hill Connect is by far much better than Pearson Revel. It has more functionality. I think the McGraw-Hill SmartBook is better than the Pearson Revel (which is merely a reading app). The SmartBook allows instructors customization and it helps students to …
Top Pros
Top Cons

No answers on this topic

Best Alternatives
McGraw-Hill ConnectPearson Revel
Small Businesses
Renaissance Accelerated Reader
Renaissance Accelerated Reader
Score 9.8 out of 10
Renaissance Accelerated Reader
Renaissance Accelerated Reader
Score 9.8 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Renaissance Accelerated Reader
Renaissance Accelerated Reader
Score 9.8 out of 10
Renaissance Accelerated Reader
Renaissance Accelerated Reader
Score 9.8 out of 10
Enterprises
Renaissance Accelerated Reader
Renaissance Accelerated Reader
Score 9.8 out of 10
Renaissance Accelerated Reader
Renaissance Accelerated Reader
Score 9.8 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
McGraw-Hill ConnectPearson Revel
Likelihood to Recommend
8.9
(11 ratings)
4.0
(2 ratings)
Usability
5.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
2.9
(4 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
McGraw-Hill ConnectPearson Revel
Likelihood to Recommend
McGraw-Hill Education
Content is pretty good, and site is good as standalone tool, but it does not integrate will with any LMS. Grade pass back does not work with Google Classroom or Skyward (unsure about Power School or others) SSO works with Clever, but not Google, so students always have to go through Clever and cannot go directly from Google Classroom to an assignment, even if you posted to Google Classroom through the Connect portal. Problem sets are robust, but difficult to edit and assessments are designed to be web based. Formatting is poor when trying to print assessments that were created online.
Read full review
Pearson
Pearson Revel is probably best suited for distance learning of large sections where there is little time for discussion and grading assignments manually is prohibitive. I would prefer not to use it with small classes and traditional classes.
Read full review
Pros
McGraw-Hill Education
  • Integration with Canvas is seamless and easy to use.
  • Assignment completion, for students, is straightforward and easy to use.
  • The SmartBook allows students to read as they are tested with questions and this helps them learn the material easily without having first trying to read, memorize a chapter and then answer questions.
Read full review
Pearson
  • Ease of assigning reading
  • Ease of tracking level of student engagement
  • Ease of use for instructors
Read full review
Cons
McGraw-Hill Education
  • The ebook is not a real ebook, it's really just a web page, or a series of webpages. It can only be accessed through MH Connect, therefore, when logging into the system. A real eBook would be able to be accessed as such-- on a Kindle or other e-Reader, or on a desktop eBook reader. The interface for this is also not very dynamic, just kind of obnoxious and Web 1.0.
  • Limited learning tools beyond simple exercises, at least from what I saw.
  • Terrible customer service. Long wait times with representatives who do not seem to understand their own product and cannot seem to answer very basic questions.
  • Hard to get resolution for basic problems.
Read full review
Pearson
  • Unfortunately, there are some videos that do not play, or situations where the video does not match the question content. These are bugs that should be attended to by Pearson, but although I have reported them (along with students), they have not been remedied.
  • Instructors who would prefer to use only the digital text do not have the option to purchase the text without the platform.
  • Because the text and software are integrated, there are no "page numbers" as in other digital texts which makes it hard to reference a particular section in a lecture, assignment, or presentation.
Read full review
Usability
McGraw-Hill Education
There is quite a steep learning curve in effectively navigating the site and using the resources. MGH seems to discourage integration with other sites, by only allowing links to their site rather than full assignment integration with grade pass back. Resources for teachers and students is good, but presentation format is different than many other programs, forcing both to learn another system.
Read full review
Pearson
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
McGraw-Hill Education
Personally, I did not encounter McGraw-Hill support. However, I worked with colleagues who needed support and were able to receive in a timely manner. Overall, McGraw Hill Connect is user-friendly (at least from teacher interface) and easy to navigate, which minimizes the need to reach out for support. The help button is useful and provides plenty of immediate support.
Read full review
Pearson
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
McGraw-Hill Education
McGraw-Hill is the most user-friendly and teacher-friendly for students and teachers. McGraw-Hill provided the online portion of learning that helped teachers provide the resources to students that were needed. Additionally, even though McGraw-Hill is wordy in its descriptions in the workbooks it was the least "wordy" of the other options provided to teachers, such as, Go Math.
Read full review
Pearson
In my opinion, McGraw-Hill Connect is by far much better than Pearson Revel. It has more functionality. I think the McGraw-Hill SmartBook is better than the Pearson Revel (which is merely a reading app). The SmartBook allows instructors customization and it helps students to master the materials better than just a reading app. In my experience, McGraw-Hill provides exception customer support. They always reply to my questions in a timely manner. I have used both Pearson Revel and McGraw-Hill Connect and I will have to say that I will not be going back to use Pearson Revel.
Read full review
Return on Investment
McGraw-Hill Education
  • Improved efficiency from analysts looking to speed up the time it takes to do certain tasks.
  • Less waste on searching and researching how to do certain concepts.
  • Negative impact is use by individuals that can learn better through other methods that don't require activities.
Read full review
Pearson
  • NEGATIVE: The platform is less expensive than a printed text, but students can use OER's for free. This is especially important at the community college level where students tend to have less financial resources for education.
  • NEGATIVE: After the course completes, the student has nothing to use as a reference. They cannot go back and view the content, nor can they print any of the content.
  • NEGATIVE: The student pays for the learning platform and content which includes a large number of activities and resources. While this seems to be a positive thing, students (and instructors) can get overwhelmed with the number of activities and resources available. Some students won't use any of the resources at all.
Read full review
ScreenShots