Microsoft Access vs. Red Hat JBoss Data Virtualization
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Microsoft Access | Score7.5 out of 10 | N/A | Microsoft Access is a database management system from Microsoft that combines the relational Microsoft Jet Database Engine with a graphical user interface and software-development tools. | $139.99 per PC |
JBoss Data Virtualization | Score6 out of 10 | N/A | JBoss Data Virtualization is a data integration solution that sits in front of multiple data sources and allows them to be treated as a single source, to deliver the right data, in the required form, at the right time to any application and/or user. Also presented as a lean, virtual data integration solution that unlocks trapped data and delivers it as easily consumable, unified, and actionable information. Red Hat JBoss Data Virtualization makes data spread across physically diverse… | N/A |
| Microsoft Access | JBoss Data Virtualization | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules |
| No answers on this topic | ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| Microsoft Access | JBoss Data Virtualization | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | ![]() No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
97% Would buy again 29 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
97% Delivers good value for the price 29 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
93% Happy with the feature set 28 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
86% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 19 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
91% Implementation went as expected 21 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Microsoft Access | JBoss Data Virtualization | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Relational Databases |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Microsoft Access | JBoss Data Virtualization | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | Amazon RDS Score8.1 out of 10 | No answers on this topic |
| Medium-sized Companies | SingleStore Score8.2 out of 10 | No answers on this topic |
| Enterprises | SAP IQ Score5.4 out of 10 | No answers on this topic |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| Microsoft Access | JBoss Data Virtualization | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 7.4 | 6.0 |
| Likelihood to Renew | 10.0 | - |
| Usability | 7.6 | - |
| Availability | 8.0 | - |
| Support Rating | 6.4 | 8.0 |
| Implementation Rating | 10.0 | - |
| Ease of integration | 8.0 | - |
| Product Scalability | 5.0 | - |
| Microsoft Access | JBoss Data Virtualization | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | ![]()
|
|
| Pros | ![]()
|
|
| Cons | ![]()
|
|
| Likelihood to Renew | ![]()
| No answers on this topic |
| Usability | ![]()
| No answers on this topic |
| Reliability and Availability | ![]()
| No answers on this topic |
| Support Rating | ![]()
|
|
| Implementation Rating | ![]()
| No answers on this topic |
| Alternatives Considered | ![]()
|
|
| Return on Investment | ![]()
|
|
| ScreenShots |





