Microsoft Application Server (deprecated) vs. Oracle Java SE Subscription
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Microsoft Application Server (deprecated) | Score7.3 out of 10 | N/A | Application Server is an expanded server role in the Windows Server® 2008 operating system. It provided an integrated environment for deploying and running custom, server-based business applications. These applications respond to requests that arrive over the network from remote client computers or from other applications. Application Server is deprecated. | N/A |
Oracle Java SE Subscription | Score8.9 out of 10 | N/A | Oracle Java SE Subscription combines license and support into a subscription to enable users to manage Java SE installations, updates and upgrades across the enterprise. The former Java SE Advanced, Java SE Advanced Desktop, and Java SE Suite products have transitioned to a Java SE Subscriptions. Beyond the unlicensed version, purchasers of Oracle Java SE Subscription receive all-hours access to My Oracle Support, enterprise monitoring, management, and deployment features, and early access to… | $2.50 per named user per month |
| Microsoft Application Server (deprecated) | Oracle Java SE Subscription | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic |
| ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | Volume discounts also available. | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| Microsoft Application Server (deprecated) | Oracle Java SE Subscription | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
100% Would buy again 7 Answers | 93% Would buy again 63 Answers | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
100% Delivers good value for the price 7 Answers | 92% Delivers good value for the price 60 Answers | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
100% Happy with the feature set 7 Answers | 94% Happy with the feature set 64 Answers | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
100% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 6 Answers | 98% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 42 Answers | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
100% Implementation went as expected 7 Answers | 98% Implementation went as expected 61 Answers | |
| Microsoft Application Server (deprecated) | Oracle Java SE Subscription | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Application Servers |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Microsoft Application Server (deprecated) | Oracle Java SE Subscription | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | NGINX Score9.1 out of 10 | GraalVM Score9.1 out of 10 |
| Medium-sized Companies | Oracle WebLogic Server Score7.3 out of 10 | Oracle Java SE Score8.1 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | NGINX Score9.1 out of 10 | GraalVM Score9.1 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| Microsoft Application Server (deprecated) | Oracle Java SE Subscription | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 9.0 | 8.6 |
| Likelihood to Renew | - | 8.2 |
| Usability | 10.0 | - |
| Support Rating | 9.0 | 9.4 |
| Microsoft Application Server (deprecated) | Oracle Java SE Subscription | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Likelihood to Renew | No answers on this topic |
|
| Usability |
| No answers on this topic |
| Support Rating |
|
|
| Alternatives Considered |
|
|
| Return on Investment |
|
|
| ScreenShots |

