Microsoft Dynamics SL vs. Oracle PeopleSoft ERP

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Microsoft Dynamics SL
Score 7.3 out of 10
N/A
Microsoft Dynamics SL is one of the ERP products in the Dynamics family. This product was acquired from Solomon 2000. The product is typically used by SMBs, particularly in project-based businesses (e.g. construction). It has strong accounting and project management capabilities.N/A
Oracle PeopleSoft ERP
Score 7.1 out of 10
N/A
Oracle's PeopleSoft ERP (or PeopleSoft FSCM) is a software solution used to reduce costs by automating and centralizing global transactional processes and the enterprise entire supply chain. Oracle states they have extended support for PeopleSoft to 2034.N/A
Pricing
Microsoft Dynamics SLOracle PeopleSoft ERP
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Microsoft Dynamics SLOracle PeopleSoft ERP
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Microsoft Dynamics SLOracle PeopleSoft ERP
Considered Both Products
Microsoft Dynamics SL
Chose Microsoft Dynamics SL
Different class. Microsoft Dynamics SL isn't modern in design or interface.
Oracle PeopleSoft ERP

No answer on this topic

Top Pros
Top Cons
Features
Microsoft Dynamics SLOracle PeopleSoft ERP
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics SL
8.5
2 Ratings
16% above category average
Oracle PeopleSoft ERP
6.2
18 Ratings
15% below category average
Pay calculation9.62 Ratings6.018 Ratings
Direct deposit files9.01 Ratings5.018 Ratings
Benefit plan administration00 Ratings6.017 Ratings
Customization
Comparison of Customization features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics SL
6.0
6 Ratings
19% below category average
Oracle PeopleSoft ERP
10.0
20 Ratings
32% above category average
API for custom integration6.06 Ratings10.019 Ratings
Plug-ins6.04 Ratings10.016 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics SL
7.3
9 Ratings
11% below category average
Oracle PeopleSoft ERP
10.0
25 Ratings
21% above category average
Single sign-on capability7.49 Ratings10.021 Ratings
Role-based user permissions7.38 Ratings10.024 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics SL
6.8
9 Ratings
2% below category average
Oracle PeopleSoft ERP
9.3
26 Ratings
29% above category average
Dashboards7.15 Ratings10.022 Ratings
Standard reports7.19 Ratings8.025 Ratings
Custom reports6.19 Ratings10.025 Ratings
General Ledger and Configurable Accounting
Comparison of General Ledger and Configurable Accounting features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics SL
7.4
10 Ratings
3% below category average
Oracle PeopleSoft ERP
8.3
29 Ratings
8% above category average
Accounts payable7.610 Ratings8.125 Ratings
Accounts receivable6.07 Ratings7.724 Ratings
Global Financial Support6.01 Ratings9.016 Ratings
Primary and Secondary Ledgers6.63 Ratings10.024 Ratings
Journals and Reconciliations7.43 Ratings10.024 Ratings
Configurable Accounting7.02 Ratings10.020 Ratings
Standardized Processes7.32 Ratings10.019 Ratings
Inventory Management
Comparison of Inventory Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics SL
4.3
5 Ratings
59% below category average
Oracle PeopleSoft ERP
6.0
12 Ratings
27% below category average
Inventory tracking6.05 Ratings7.011 Ratings
Location management1.02 Ratings7.011 Ratings
Automatic reordering00 Ratings5.09 Ratings
Order Management
Comparison of Order Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics SL
6.7
3 Ratings
15% below category average
Oracle PeopleSoft ERP
7.8
9 Ratings
0% above category average
Pricing6.02 Ratings8.07 Ratings
Order entry6.03 Ratings10.08 Ratings
Credit card processing7.02 Ratings5.05 Ratings
Cost of goods sold7.02 Ratings9.04 Ratings
Order Orchestration00 Ratings8.53 Ratings
Subledger and Financial Process
Comparison of Subledger and Financial Process features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics SL
5.8
3 Ratings
24% below category average
Oracle PeopleSoft ERP
8.1
25 Ratings
9% above category average
Billing Management6.01 Ratings10.018 Ratings
Cash and Asset Management7.33 Ratings8.015 Ratings
Travel & Expense Management5.01 Ratings5.113 Ratings
Budgetary Control & Encumbrance Accounting6.32 Ratings8.713 Ratings
Period Close7.43 Ratings10.020 Ratings
Project Financial Management
Comparison of Project Financial Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics SL
4.7
3 Ratings
47% below category average
Oracle PeopleSoft ERP
7.4
12 Ratings
3% below category average
Budgeting and Forecasting7.33 Ratings7.012 Ratings
Project Costing6.33 Ratings7.111 Ratings
Cost Capture2.12 Ratings7.110 Ratings
Capital Project Management8.01 Ratings8.310 Ratings
Project Revenue Recognition2.01 Ratings8.310 Ratings
Customer Contract Compliance00 Ratings8.710 Ratings
Grants Management
Comparison of Grants Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics SL
6.3
1 Ratings
18% below category average
Oracle PeopleSoft ERP
9.3
10 Ratings
21% above category average
Award Lifecycle Management6.01 Ratings8.79 Ratings
Manufacturing
Comparison of Manufacturing features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics SL
6.0
1 Ratings
23% below category average
Oracle PeopleSoft ERP
8.7
4 Ratings
14% above category average
Production Management6.01 Ratings8.04 Ratings
Production Process Design00 Ratings9.03 Ratings
Configuration Management00 Ratings8.04 Ratings
Work Execution00 Ratings9.03 Ratings
Manufacturing Costs00 Ratings8.04 Ratings
Supply Chain
Comparison of Supply Chain features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics SL
6.0
1 Ratings
19% below category average
Oracle PeopleSoft ERP
7.4
10 Ratings
2% above category average
Inventory Planning6.01 Ratings7.09 Ratings
Forecasting00 Ratings7.010 Ratings
Performance Monitoring00 Ratings7.09 Ratings
Project Execution Management
Comparison of Project Execution Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics SL
-
Ratings
Oracle PeopleSoft ERP
6.9
8 Ratings
1% above category average
Project Planning and Scheduling00 Ratings8.08 Ratings
Task Insight for Project Managers00 Ratings7.07 Ratings
Project Mobile Functionality00 Ratings8.07 Ratings
Definable Resource Pools00 Ratings7.07 Ratings
Procurement
Comparison of Procurement features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics SL
-
Ratings
Oracle PeopleSoft ERP
6.5
17 Ratings
7% below category average
Bids Analyzed and Compared00 Ratings6.09 Ratings
Contract Authoring00 Ratings6.07 Ratings
Contract Repository00 Ratings8.011 Ratings
Requisitions-to-Purchase Orders Integrated00 Ratings8.013 Ratings
Supplier Management00 Ratings10.011 Ratings
Risk Management
Comparison of Risk Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics SL
-
Ratings
Oracle PeopleSoft ERP
5.2
3 Ratings
22% below category average
Risk Repository00 Ratings5.03 Ratings
Control Management00 Ratings5.03 Ratings
Control Efficiency Assessments00 Ratings6.03 Ratings
Issue Detection00 Ratings5.03 Ratings
Remediation and Certification00 Ratings5.03 Ratings
Logistics
Comparison of Logistics features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics SL
-
Ratings
Oracle PeopleSoft ERP
9.0
2 Ratings
27% above category average
Transportation Planning and Optimization00 Ratings9.02 Ratings
Transportation Execution Management00 Ratings9.02 Ratings
Trade and Customs Management00 Ratings9.02 Ratings
Fulfillment Management00 Ratings9.02 Ratings
Warehouse Workforce Management00 Ratings9.02 Ratings
Product Lifecycle Management
Comparison of Product Lifecycle Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics SL
-
Ratings
Oracle PeopleSoft ERP
8.9
3 Ratings
20% above category average
Proposal Management00 Ratings9.02 Ratings
Product Master Data Management00 Ratings8.53 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Microsoft Dynamics SLOracle PeopleSoft ERP
Small Businesses
Acumatica
Acumatica
Score 8.8 out of 10
Acumatica
Acumatica
Score 8.8 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Infor VISUAL
Infor VISUAL
Score 7.2 out of 10
Infor VISUAL
Infor VISUAL
Score 7.2 out of 10
Enterprises
SAP Business ByDesign
SAP Business ByDesign
Score 7.4 out of 10
SAP Business ByDesign
SAP Business ByDesign
Score 7.4 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics SLOracle PeopleSoft ERP
Likelihood to Recommend
6.6
(17 ratings)
10.0
(40 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
5.4
(8 ratings)
10.0
(3 ratings)
Usability
1.8
(6 ratings)
5.0
(3 ratings)
Availability
9.9
(2 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
Performance
1.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
9.5
(4 ratings)
7.0
(2 ratings)
Online Training
1.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
9.0
(4 ratings)
7.0
(2 ratings)
Product Scalability
1.4
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Microsoft Dynamics SLOracle PeopleSoft ERP
Likelihood to Recommend
Microsoft
For a small to mid-size business, MS Dynamics SL is effective. We are capable of managing our finances with a very low risk of error. We have worked with MS Dynamics for almost 15 years and have more than doubled the size of our business in that time with very few issues from the program. We have exponentially increased our revenue and reporting demands and have found SL to be very dependable and stable. The program does have the occasional glitch and those are sometimes outside of the realm of expertise of our IT department. SL support is excellent, but their timeliness is not as urgent as ours.
Read full review
Oracle
You really need a big enterprise to take advantage of PeopleSoft. It is not entirely user-friendly, and it often requires massive amounts of customization to make it work for layers if you will. Business experts can figure it out, but if you are expecting someone to easily learn how to use the timekeeping modules without heavy customization, it's really not for you. You need to know going in, that this is not for a small business at all, and not even a medium-sized enterprise. It's geared to massive organizations that need to integrate business processes over geographic areas and multiple departments.
Read full review
Pros
Microsoft
  • Provides flexibility for complex project based cost accounting
  • Strong and flexible allocation processer for cost allocations, markups, and pricing
  • A "Flexible Billing" module under the project controller series that allows for multiple billing formats ranging from fixed price schedule of values, T&M or Cost Plus, and scheduled billing.
  • Flexible reporting with options using Crystal Reports, SSRS, a Quick Query tool, and ability to tie into MS Office tools such as MS Access and MS Excel
  • Tight integration with Financials, but also the ability to integrate with modules such as Sales Order, Inventory, and Field Service
  • Customization abilities ranging from a VBA (visual basic for application) foundation to allow customizing existing forms to the ability to use the SDK (Software Development Kit) to build more complex customizations that integrate with Dynamics SL.
Read full review
Oracle
  • One of the best thing it does is it is customizable. You can implement any business logic you need. This is one of the very key assets of PeopleSoft Financials.
  • PeopleSoft Financials's accounting methods are in line with industry standards. You can use the process as is and ledger will be taken care of.
  • It supports multiple ways to integrate with other systems.
Read full review
Cons
Microsoft
  • Reporting in the Project module is lacking functionality. I understand that most companies have specific needs when it comes to tracking project information but the standard reports are not good.
  • I would recommend a product like Management Reporter that is for Projects only. Project Reporter should allow users to pull in all Project related data into reports.
  • Fixing suspended batches. Obviously all of us users have experienced this mess. SL knows what needs to be corrected and there could be some step by step fixes in a separate repair module to do the steps we do in Query Analyzer.
Read full review
Oracle
  • PeopleSoft Financials does not address the needs of small organizations that do not have a large enough staff to maintain the software or utilize the features it provides as it requires a moderate staff to keep track of all of the transactions and processing
  • PeopleSoft licensing costs are significant, which are relative to the features provided but in many cases those features may not be necessary
  • PeopleSoft licensing structures can be frustrating at times when certain modules would allow you to perform the complex task needed but it would require the entire module to be licensed for just that one feature (e.g. Cash Management for loading bank statements in certain formats)
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Microsoft
Unfortunately, Dynamics' lack of ability to smoothly integrate with our CRM system is causing us to look at other solutions. The efficiencies that we gain by using Dynamics for our day to day accounting are lost in the constant headaches of getting sales quotes to import properly into the system for invoicing. Another major issue for us has been budgeting and reporting. We currently do all of our budgeting and board reporting in Excel, which is too time consuming and inefficient, especially when a system as robust as Dynamics should easily be able to handle this relatively simple task.
Read full review
Oracle
PRISM is a great tool to track and watch numerous financial documents. I would like to see more of an integration platform that would control tracking for specific project details. There is currently only a little section for job notes which I would like to see improve. I think navigation could be improved, but isn't the worst compared to some platforms I have worked with as it provides a tree like structure on the backend which helps synchronize information together for fiscal financials.
Read full review
Usability
Microsoft
I rate it a 10 because we have removed the fields we don't need so users can really crank the data into the system. The software was designed for the professional services firm in mind but does a tremendous job for construction firms and "blended" companies that are both distribution firms but project centric as well. Perhaps they drop ship inventory to a project where their employees or subs need to work on a project for example.
Read full review
Oracle
I am aware of better systems, but this is what the employer I work for has to offer. Overall, there are fewer negatives than positives so I would support the usability. New staff members can quickly obtain access and go through a 5-10 minute training video that we build in house. The speed at which someone can become a proficient user speaks to the usability of ePro.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
Microsoft
We have had only one unplanned outage for 2 hours in the last 30 months. We shut down for 30 min to 1 hour once a month, but that is for Microsoft OS updates to the servers. Being a 24/7 world wide operation, the reliability is really important. We do get an 8 hour window on the weekend that we can be down for a short period to install Microsoft Dynamics SL updates, but we do not have many of those. On our last version upgrade, we shut the users out at 9:30 am and were fully operational in less than 6 hours. The upgrade was New SQL server, New SL server and 2 new Citrix servers.
Read full review
Oracle
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Microsoft
Support is only used when needed, so unfortunately ,they get all the odd issues. It's a difficult business, but Microsoft and our firm do a great job of meeting customer needs. We get routine feedback that our support services are very good.
Read full review
Oracle
I can't give them a perfect rating because it does often take a long time and usually more [expensive] to resolve trying issues that cannot be solved by our in-house team. PeopleSoft is complicated, and the mix and match of user-created and stock modules cause problems very often. These usually require more customization to completely fix, requiring more money spent with
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Microsoft
Just to let it take its course. The implementation for me once I became a part of my former organization was pretty seamless. Just get to know the basics and call the support team to ask questions if you need help on an issue, should they arise. They are ready, willing, and able to help!
Read full review
Oracle
I recommend that everyone pay special attention to developing a solid testing and training plan if you are even thinking of implementing PeopleSoft. Be ready to obtain good trainers and developers, otherwise, your journey can be unnecessarily painful and much more expensive. Try to stay with an implementation partner who really has your needs at heart, and actually takes the time to understand your organization!
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Microsoft
Of the comparable mid-range ERP systems, Dynamics SL competes at the lower end based on price, but also above the high-end based on flexibility, data, and reporting. Being able to stay with the same core accounting from a $100 million dollar company to a $3 billion dollar company shows the range of capabilities.
Read full review
Oracle
PeopleSoft is much more appropriate for large organizations than the software programs listed here. I'm involved in a project to bring billing and accounts receivable functions out of "shadow systems" like those listed here and into PeopleSoft, and PeopleSoft is more robust, flexible, and standardizable. We've found it to be an excellent solution.
Read full review
Scalability
Microsoft
Since the backbone of the database is MS SQLServer, the database can be easily scaled.
Read full review
Oracle
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
Microsoft
  • More time is spent on manipulating reports which can and should be automated.
  • Lack of electronic invoicing process and other green technology features creates more cost on printing and storage costs.
  • The lack of a user friendly interface requires more training and a bigger learning curve for staff.
Read full review
Oracle
  • Provides better controls to ensure that spend does not increase beyond the PO amount.
  • sPro reverse invoicing provides a mechanism to only pay our staff aug firms for only the hours that entered into PeopleSoft. There is no more reconciliation between the vendor invoices and the hours that were charged within the internal time tracking system.
  • PeopleSoft Financials increases employee efficiency through the use of dashboards and work centers.
Read full review
ScreenShots