Microsoft Dynamics SL is one of the ERP products in the Dynamics family.
This product was acquired from Solomon 2000.
The product is typically used by SMBs, particularly in project-based businesses (e.g. construction). It has strong accounting and project management capabilities.
N/A
Replicon Polaris PSA
Score7.3 out of 10
N/A
Replicon Polaris PSA is a professional services automation platform containing project management, expense tracking, and billing features, from Replicon headquartered in Redwood City, California.
N/A
Pricing
Microsoft Dynamics SL
Replicon Polaris PSA
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Microsoft Dynamics SL
Replicon Polaris PSA
Free Trial
No
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Features
Microsoft Dynamics SL
Replicon Polaris PSA
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of Microsoft Dynamics SL and Replicon Polaris PSA
Feature
Microsoft Dynamics SL
8.5
2 Ratings
12% above category average
Replicon Polaris PSA
-
Ratings
Pay calculation
9.62 Ratings
00 Ratings
Direct deposit files
9.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Customization
Comparison of Customization features of Microsoft Dynamics SL and Replicon Polaris PSA
Feature
Microsoft Dynamics SL
6.0
6 Ratings
23% below category average
Replicon Polaris PSA
-
Ratings
API for custom integration
6.06 Ratings
00 Ratings
Plug-ins
6.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of Microsoft Dynamics SL and Replicon Polaris PSA
Feature
Microsoft Dynamics SL
8.7
10 Ratings
3% above category average
Replicon Polaris PSA
-
Ratings
Single sign-on capability
7.49 Ratings
00 Ratings
Role-based user permissions
10.09 Ratings
00 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Microsoft Dynamics SL and Replicon Polaris PSA
Feature
Microsoft Dynamics SL
8.0
10 Ratings
6% above category average
Replicon Polaris PSA
-
Ratings
Dashboards
8.06 Ratings
00 Ratings
Standard reports
8.010 Ratings
00 Ratings
Custom reports
8.010 Ratings
00 Ratings
General Ledger and Configurable Accounting
Comparison of General Ledger and Configurable Accounting features of Microsoft Dynamics SL and Replicon Polaris PSA
Feature
Microsoft Dynamics SL
7.1
11 Ratings
8% below category average
Replicon Polaris PSA
-
Ratings
Accounts payable
6.011 Ratings
00 Ratings
Accounts receivable
6.08 Ratings
00 Ratings
Global Financial Support
6.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Primary and Secondary Ledgers
6.63 Ratings
00 Ratings
Journals and Reconciliations
3.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
Configurable Accounting
8.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Standardized Processes
6.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Inventory Management
Comparison of Inventory Management features of Microsoft Dynamics SL and Replicon Polaris PSA
Feature
Microsoft Dynamics SL
5.7
6 Ratings
33% below category average
Replicon Polaris PSA
-
Ratings
Inventory tracking
5.06 Ratings
00 Ratings
Location management
6.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Order Management
Comparison of Order Management features of Microsoft Dynamics SL and Replicon Polaris PSA
Feature
Microsoft Dynamics SL
6.2
4 Ratings
24% below category average
Replicon Polaris PSA
-
Ratings
Pricing
6.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Order entry
3.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
Credit card processing
7.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Cost of goods sold
7.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Subledger and Financial Process
Comparison of Subledger and Financial Process features of Microsoft Dynamics SL and Replicon Polaris PSA
Feature
Microsoft Dynamics SL
5.7
4 Ratings
28% below category average
Replicon Polaris PSA
-
Ratings
Billing Management
6.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Cash and Asset Management
7.33 Ratings
00 Ratings
Travel & Expense Management
5.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Budgetary Control & Encumbrance Accounting
6.32 Ratings
00 Ratings
Period Close
6.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Financial Management
Comparison of Project Financial Management features of Microsoft Dynamics SL and Replicon Polaris PSA
Feature
Microsoft Dynamics SL
4.7
3 Ratings
47% below category average
Replicon Polaris PSA
-
Ratings
Budgeting and Forecasting
7.33 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Costing
6.33 Ratings
00 Ratings
Cost Capture
2.12 Ratings
00 Ratings
Capital Project Management
8.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Revenue Recognition
2.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Grants Management
Comparison of Grants Management features of Microsoft Dynamics SL and Replicon Polaris PSA
Feature
Microsoft Dynamics SL
6.3
1 Ratings
17% below category average
Replicon Polaris PSA
-
Ratings
Award Lifecycle Management
6.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Manufacturing
Comparison of Manufacturing features of Microsoft Dynamics SL and Replicon Polaris PSA
Feature
Microsoft Dynamics SL
6.0
1 Ratings
22% below category average
Replicon Polaris PSA
-
Ratings
Production Management
6.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Supply Chain
Comparison of Supply Chain features of Microsoft Dynamics SL and Replicon Polaris PSA
For a small to mid-size business, MS Dynamics SL is effective. We are capable of managing our finances with a very low risk of error. We have worked with MS Dynamics for almost 15 years and have more than doubled the size of our business in that time with very few issues from the program. We have exponentially increased our revenue and reporting demands and have found SL to be very dependable and stable. The program does have the occasional glitch and those are sometimes outside of the realm of expertise of our IT department. SL support is excellent, but their timeliness is not as urgent as ours.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
It is perfect for inputing time sheets, time offs and expenses. It is hosted on the cloud, so accessible from anywhere, and even from mobile. It should nonetheless do just that, as it is not suited to track the work that you are doing or details about it. It is completely useless in that case.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Provides flexibility for complex project based cost accounting
Strong and flexible allocation processer for cost allocations, markups, and pricing
A "Flexible Billing" module under the project controller series that allows for multiple billing formats ranging from fixed price schedule of values, T&M or Cost Plus, and scheduled billing.
Flexible reporting with options using Crystal Reports, SSRS, a Quick Query tool, and ability to tie into MS Office tools such as MS Access and MS Excel
Tight integration with Financials, but also the ability to integrate with modules such as Sales Order, Inventory, and Field Service
Customization abilities ranging from a VBA (visual basic for application) foundation to allow customizing existing forms to the ability to use the SDK (Software Development Kit) to build more complex customizations that integrate with Dynamics SL.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Reporting in the Project module is lacking functionality. I understand that most companies have specific needs when it comes to tracking project information but the standard reports are not good.
I would recommend a product like Management Reporter that is for Projects only. Project Reporter should allow users to pull in all Project related data into reports.
Fixing suspended batches. Obviously all of us users have experienced this mess. SL knows what needs to be corrected and there could be some step by step fixes in a separate repair module to do the steps we do in Query Analyzer.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Though the technical support staff are always very nice, sometimes they don't seem to understand exactly what the issue is based on our explanation. There have been several times when I've ended up solving the issue on my own without their assistance, despite numerous emails and phone calls. Could be a language barrier issue, perhaps they could receive more training in how companies are actually using the software on a daily basis.
Employee time sheets have to be approved by project managers and supervisors prior to my final approval. However, when viewing the time sheets in list form, there is no way for me to tell whether a time sheet has been approved by everyone else. I have to manually open each one and hover over the approver link. It would be helpful if there was a column in the list showing which approvers still need to approve it.
There have been a few times when time sheets were accidentally deleted by approvers. In order to retrieve them, we've had to contact Replicon support and have a backup instance of the information created. It would be great if perhaps there was some sort of archive or recently deleted section that could be accessed right away without having to go through Replicon support, a folder or something that would hold on to recently deleted files for a few days or a week just in case they needed to be retrieved.
Some of our projects have more than one project manager. Replicon currently allows for co-managers to be assigned to a project, but this status does not seem to include that co-manager in the approval of time sheets and expenses. We have had to manually create an approval path to include that second manager. It would be nice if co-managers would automatically be included in those approval paths.
Unfortunately, Dynamics' lack of ability to smoothly integrate with our CRM system is causing us to look at other solutions. The efficiencies that we gain by using Dynamics for our day to day accounting are lost in the constant headaches of getting sales quotes to import properly into the system for invoicing. Another major issue for us has been budgeting and reporting. We currently do all of our budgeting and board reporting in Excel, which is too time consuming and inefficient, especially when a system as robust as Dynamics should easily be able to handle this relatively simple task.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
I rate it a 10 because we have removed the fields we don't need so users can really crank the data into the system. The software was designed for the professional services firm in mind but does a tremendous job for construction firms and "blended" companies that are both distribution firms but project centric as well. Perhaps they drop ship inventory to a project where their employees or subs need to work on a project for example.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
We have had only one unplanned outage for 2 hours in the last 30 months. We shut down for 30 min to 1 hour once a month, but that is for Microsoft OS updates to the servers. Being a 24/7 world wide operation, the reliability is really important. We do get an 8 hour window on the weekend that we can be down for a short period to install Microsoft Dynamics SL updates, but we do not have many of those. On our last version upgrade, we shut the users out at 9:30 am and were fully operational in less than 6 hours. The upgrade was New SQL server, New SL server and 2 new Citrix servers.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Support is only used when needed, so unfortunately ,they get all the odd issues. It's a difficult business, but Microsoft and our firm do a great job of meeting customer needs. We get routine feedback that our support services are very good.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Just to let it take its course. The implementation for me once I became a part of my former organization was pretty seamless. Just get to know the basics and call the support team to ask questions if you need help on an issue, should they arise. They are ready, willing, and able to help!
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Of the comparable mid-range ERP systems, Dynamics SL competes at the lower end based on price, but also above the high-end based on flexibility, data, and reporting. Being able to stay with the same core accounting from a $100 million dollar company to a $3 billion dollar company shows the range of capabilities.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
We used to track time on JIRA on the tickets. This was good enough for time tracking, but didn't integrate efficiently with accounting software, so accountants had to replicate manually the data from JIRA to their software in order to bill clients. Using Replicon made things much easier for them.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info