Microsoft Teams Rooms

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Microsoft Teams Rooms
Score 7.8 out of 10
N/A
A solution to turn any space into a meeting room designed for inclusive collaboration, where everyone can fully participate.
$40
per month (annual subscription) per room
Pricing
Microsoft Teams Rooms
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Microsoft Teams Rooms
Free Trial
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
Yes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Microsoft Teams Rooms
Considered Both Products
Microsoft Teams Rooms
Chose Microsoft Teams Rooms
Microsoft Teams Rooms has been more cost effective for us than using a separate subscription from another vendor. With our microsoft 365 tenant already in-place we've streamlined our configuration and licensing into a single management portal which really suites us and the way …
Chose Microsoft Teams Rooms
I consider MTR better because it first allows integration with all the Microsoft apps and is more cost-effective, considering all the included services such as the Office app, Cloud Storage, and email.
Chose Microsoft Teams Rooms
Microsoft Teams Rooms is very similar to WebEx and Zoom. Webex is no longer an option, and we use Microsoft Teams Rooms more frequently than Zoom simply due to its functionality and ease of use for our team. It is also more cost-effective than the other options, which is a very …
Chose Microsoft Teams Rooms
Limited customization options vs Microsoft Teams Rooms.
Chose Microsoft Teams Rooms
Microsoft Teams Rooms is better than Yealink conferencing phones but not better than Webex App or the Webex conferencing devices. Microsoft Teams Rooms have better system features than Yealink devices. Yealink lacks in variety of features and also focuses more on core …
Features
Microsoft Teams Rooms
Performance & Compatibility of Online Events Software
Comparison of Performance & Compatibility of Online Events Software features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Teams Rooms
7.9
6 Ratings
0% below category average
High quality audio8.76 Ratings
High quality video8.26 Ratings
Low bandwidth requirements7.05 Ratings
Mobile support7.85 Ratings
Screen Sharing
Comparison of Screen Sharing features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Teams Rooms
8.2
6 Ratings
4% above category average
Desktop sharing8.56 Ratings
Whiteboards7.96 Ratings
Online Meetings / Events
Comparison of Online Meetings / Events features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Teams Rooms
8.4
6 Ratings
3% above category average
Calendar integration8.76 Ratings
Meeting initiation8.65 Ratings
Integrates with social media8.03 Ratings
Record meetings / events8.76 Ratings
Slideshows8.26 Ratings
Online Events Collaboration
Comparison of Online Events Collaboration features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Teams Rooms
8.3
6 Ratings
3% above category average
Live chat8.06 Ratings
Audience polling8.36 Ratings
Q&A8.56 Ratings
Online Events Security
Comparison of Online Events Security features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Teams Rooms
8.4
6 Ratings
5% above category average
User authentication9.26 Ratings
Participant roles & permissions8.26 Ratings
Confidential attendee list8.04 Ratings
VoIP system collaboration
Comparison of VoIP system collaboration features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Teams Rooms
8.7
6 Ratings
14% above category average
Video conferencing8.76 Ratings
Audio conferencing8.76 Ratings
Video screen sharing8.56 Ratings
Instant messaging8.85 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Microsoft Teams Rooms
Small Businesses
Intermedia AnyMeeting Pro
Intermedia AnyMeeting Pro
Score 7.3 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
JioMeet
JioMeet
Score 9.7 out of 10
Enterprises
Webex Meetings
Webex Meetings
Score 8.5 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Microsoft Teams Rooms
Likelihood to Recommend
8.4
(6 ratings)
Usability
8.5
(6 ratings)
User Testimonials
Microsoft Teams Rooms
Likelihood to Recommend
Microsoft
We use Microsoft Teams Rooms across all of our main conference suites. This ensure our staff have consistent meeting experiences in out part of the education sector - meetings generally become hybrid fairly frequently and can even extend to pupils or staff working from home. We did try some of the poly equipment in a classroom environment but due to noise levels and the amount of pupils and staff it quickly became a non starter. We were advised to stick with participant numbers aligned to our purchased hardware before we tried this.
Read full review
Pros
Microsoft
  • Camera view selection is a nice feature which allows remote users to choose the camera feedback to select for better experience.
  • Live reactions like hand claps, thumbs up, raised hands,etc can be used to indicate to presenters that a meeting attendee has a question. This is cool.
  • We can connect our laptop seamlessly to the Microsoft Teams Rooms to share our content or presentation which makes things very simple.
Read full review
Cons
Microsoft
  • Improve AI Camera to frame participants in large rooms
  • no translation captions in real team for multilingual teams
  • new elements to introduce quizzes and help with engagement
Read full review
Usability
Microsoft
Microsoft Teams Rooms has been very useful for our small business. As mentioned, it has allowed us to connect with our team more regularly, share important information, and keep productivity up by allowing our team to get on remotely and not have to commute to be together in person.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Microsoft
I consider MTR better because it first allows integration with all the Microsoft apps and is more cost-effective, considering all the included services such as the Office app, Cloud Storage, and email.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Microsoft
  • Increase in Staff confidence to use meeting equipment
  • less "device failures" during meetings
  • More and more staff have reduced the need to travel to each of our sites for a meeting.
Read full review
ScreenShots