Microsoft Viva Engage vs. Oracle Beehive Enterprise Collaboration Server

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Microsoft Viva Engage
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
Microsoft Viva Engage, formerly Yammer, is used for private communication within organizations or between organizational members and pre-designated groups.
$24
per year per user
Oracle Beehive Enterprise Collaboration Server
Score 6.0 out of 10
N/A
Oracle Beehive Enterprise Collaboration Server provides hosted collaboration and voice / web conferencing tools at the enterprise level.N/A
Pricing
Microsoft Viva EngageOracle Beehive Enterprise Collaboration Server
Editions & Modules
Microsoft Viva Employee Communications and Communities
$24
per year per user
Microsoft Viva Suite
$144
per year per user
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Microsoft Viva EngageOracle Beehive Enterprise Collaboration Server
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsMicrosoft Viva Engage is also available in some Microsoft 365 packages.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Microsoft Viva EngageOracle Beehive Enterprise Collaboration Server
Features
Microsoft Viva EngageOracle Beehive Enterprise Collaboration Server
Project Management
Comparison of Project Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Viva Engage
5.4
42 Ratings
35% below category average
Oracle Beehive Enterprise Collaboration Server
5.3
3 Ratings
37% below category average
Task Management6.025 Ratings5.03 Ratings
Gantt Charts7.013 Ratings5.02 Ratings
Scheduling3.019 Ratings5.03 Ratings
Workflow Automation2.021 Ratings5.02 Ratings
Mobile Access9.040 Ratings5.03 Ratings
Search7.040 Ratings5.03 Ratings
Visual planning tools4.023 Ratings7.03 Ratings
Communication
Comparison of Communication features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Viva Engage
8.2
45 Ratings
3% above category average
Oracle Beehive Enterprise Collaboration Server
5.8
3 Ratings
32% below category average
Chat8.040 Ratings8.03 Ratings
Notifications8.645 Ratings8.03 Ratings
Discussions9.044 Ratings7.03 Ratings
Surveys7.635 Ratings7.03 Ratings
Internal knowledgebase9.534 Ratings7.03 Ratings
Integrates with GoToMeeting7.314 Ratings7.01 Ratings
Integrates with Gmail and Google Hangouts6.713 Ratings1.01 Ratings
Integrates with Outlook8.632 Ratings1.02 Ratings
File Sharing & Management
Comparison of File Sharing & Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Viva Engage
6.8
38 Ratings
16% below category average
Oracle Beehive Enterprise Collaboration Server
6.6
3 Ratings
19% below category average
Versioning7.025 Ratings7.02 Ratings
Video files6.633 Ratings7.03 Ratings
Audio files6.131 Ratings7.03 Ratings
Document collaboration4.732 Ratings7.03 Ratings
Access control5.632 Ratings7.03 Ratings
Advanced security features7.629 Ratings7.03 Ratings
Integrates with Google Drive8.014 Ratings4.02 Ratings
Device sync8.625 Ratings7.02 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Microsoft Viva EngageOracle Beehive Enterprise Collaboration Server
Small Businesses
Stackby
Stackby
Score 9.0 out of 10
Stackby
Stackby
Score 9.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Troop Messenger
Troop Messenger
Score 9.8 out of 10
Troop Messenger
Troop Messenger
Score 9.8 out of 10
Enterprises
HCL Connections
HCL Connections
Score 9.0 out of 10
HCL Connections
HCL Connections
Score 9.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Microsoft Viva EngageOracle Beehive Enterprise Collaboration Server
Likelihood to Recommend
8.4
(55 ratings)
6.0
(3 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
9.0
(11 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
8.0
(5 ratings)
6.0
(1 ratings)
Availability
8.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Performance
9.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
7.0
(12 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Online Training
7.0
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
8.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Microsoft Viva EngageOracle Beehive Enterprise Collaboration Server
Likelihood to Recommend
Microsoft
Yammer is great when you have a company culture that encourages friendly collaboration and communication. It can be a great supplement (but certainly not a substitute) for bonding and sharing ideas and thoughts. Certain channels can be really successful, too, like a channel where people can post dog pictures or something fun like that!
Read full review
Oracle
The software is well suited in most areas of messaging. The communication features it contains and the messaging quality it utilizes provides for standards, like scalability, manageability and, most importantly, secure communications. Again, the software is well suited for scenarios where an organization is aimed at making use of a centralized management. it is built to provide a unified collaborative platform characterized by a single object model and also has a database storage for almost all communication records.
Read full review
Pros
Microsoft
  • Providing a platform for social news in the company where "bottom up" topics can percolate freely across department
  • Social networking across the company where folks can divide their work into topics instead of teams
  • Basic collaboration within a group including document sharing with ability to pin documents to a team
Read full review
Oracle
  • Centralized workspaces
  • Strong access controls
  • Robust document management
Read full review
Cons
Microsoft
  • Although the social enterprise network works very well, there is room for some slight improvement - such as the ability to attract users. By being part of the Microsoft Office Suite, it is offered as an "add-on" and many overlook it and see it as unnecessary at first. It would be smart for Microsoft to sell it as its own product so it could gather more popularity as a "social network".
  • Giving an option to filter results could be better as well as giving an option to turn off the "recent activity" bar on the home page.
Read full review
Oracle
  • The main aspect is the cost - They should trim it down a bit.
  • My pears have told me this. Even i am telling the same - The interface just fails to grab that attention. High time the team should work on this.
  • Though many aspects are brought into one product, they lacked to provide individual attention to each feature (like a messaging app) and improvise it.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Microsoft
Microsoft is dedicated to continual improvement on Yammer. They realize the value that Yammer brings to the table with their clients. In the short time that we have had Yammer implemented, we are just now beginning to see the strong impact it has on becoming more effective and efficient around collaboration.
Read full review
Oracle
No answers on this topic
Usability
Microsoft
Overall easy to use and intuitive, although limited in the possibility to personalize layout and look & feel of a site. Some functionalities are not easy to use, like document editing, but some others are quick and effective (posts and tagging above all). Performance and responsiveness of the Yammer site is typically acceptable, in my experience.
Read full review
Oracle
No answers on this topic
Reliability and Availability
Microsoft
Very available
Read full review
Oracle
No answers on this topic
Performance
Microsoft
It's a simple product but it does provide value.
Read full review
Oracle
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Microsoft
We have never had to use the support for Yammer. The tool works well and we have not come across any bugs. User Interface is simple and easy to use, similar to other forum type products, thereby removing the need for any extensive training. Team members are invited in and immediately are able to start using the tool.
Read full review
Oracle
No answers on this topic
Online Training
Microsoft
The training that Microsoft provides is very generic training for Yammer. I like the fact the training is short and easy to understand
Read full review
Oracle
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
Microsoft
We organically implemented the product
Read full review
Oracle
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Microsoft
Our team briefly used Salesforce.com's Chatter product before switching over to Yammer in 2012. While Chatter is essentially the same product as Yammer, it left much to be desired. Chatter's design was (and remains) clunky and difficult to navigate. Yammer is a simple, easy-to-use product that offers similar functionality as Salesforce's Chatter.
Read full review
Oracle
The only feature that makes Beehive Enterprise Collaborative software stack up against similar software is unification. It is wholly unified. Basically, it allows IT to function as one platform providing services like email, team workspace, and conferencing. Uniquely, this results in saving time and cost related to managing separate systems
Read full review
Return on Investment
Microsoft
  • My company is pleased with the positive impact Yammer has created departmentally and on an individual basis with work flow efficiency.
  • Adversely, most old and new employees are more familiar with SharePoint, causing the company to pay for training for all current and incoming employees.
  • As Yammer becomes more widely used, the need for training may diminish, which is where we will see our return on investment, as the product clearly provides a more effective form of file sharing and communication between employees and their department.
Read full review
Oracle
  • Improved control over project documents, approvals, and version history, which reduced rework and helped teams meet deadlines.
  • Strong access controls supported audit and compliance needs, reducing risk and improving review efficiency.
  • Positive in environments where security, document control, and structured workflows are priorities.
Read full review
ScreenShots