Microsoft Viva Engage vs. Teamspective

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Microsoft Viva Engage
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
Microsoft Viva Engage, formerly Yammer, is used for private communication within organizations or between organizational members and pre-designated groups.
$24
per year per user
Teamspective
Score 9.1 out of 10
N/A
Teamspective is an employee engagement and performance management platform used by tech companies, that offers "3 unique twists": 1). Teamspective's in-Slack user experience: From data collection to receiving insights, action suggestions and 1-to-1 notes capturing, employees can do it all without leaving Slack. 2). Teamspective uses AI to enable leaders to action: Teamspective platform uses AI and large language models…
$3
per month per user
Pricing
Microsoft Viva EngageTeamspective
Editions & Modules
Microsoft Viva Employee Communications and Communities
$24
per year per user
Microsoft Viva Suite
$144
per year per user
Personal feedback
$3
per month per user
Pulse survey
$3
per month per user
Organizational Network Analysis
$4
per month per user
Pulse, Feedback & Evaluations
$6
per month per user
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Microsoft Viva EngageTeamspective
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoYes
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsMicrosoft Viva Engage is also available in some Microsoft 365 packages.Teamspective also provide other consulting services to help users make the most of survey results as well as to develop the organization and feedback culture.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Microsoft Viva EngageTeamspective
Features
Microsoft Viva EngageTeamspective
Project Management
Comparison of Project Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Viva Engage
5.4
42 Ratings
35% below category average
Teamspective
-
Ratings
Task Management6.025 Ratings00 Ratings
Gantt Charts7.013 Ratings00 Ratings
Scheduling3.019 Ratings00 Ratings
Workflow Automation2.021 Ratings00 Ratings
Mobile Access9.040 Ratings00 Ratings
Search7.040 Ratings00 Ratings
Visual planning tools4.023 Ratings00 Ratings
Communication
Comparison of Communication features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Viva Engage
8.2
45 Ratings
3% above category average
Teamspective
-
Ratings
Chat8.040 Ratings00 Ratings
Notifications8.545 Ratings00 Ratings
Discussions9.044 Ratings00 Ratings
Surveys7.535 Ratings00 Ratings
Internal knowledgebase9.534 Ratings00 Ratings
Integrates with GoToMeeting7.314 Ratings00 Ratings
Integrates with Gmail and Google Hangouts6.713 Ratings00 Ratings
Integrates with Outlook8.632 Ratings00 Ratings
File Sharing & Management
Comparison of File Sharing & Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Viva Engage
6.7
38 Ratings
17% below category average
Teamspective
-
Ratings
Versioning7.025 Ratings00 Ratings
Video files6.633 Ratings00 Ratings
Audio files6.131 Ratings00 Ratings
Document collaboration4.632 Ratings00 Ratings
Access control5.632 Ratings00 Ratings
Advanced security features7.629 Ratings00 Ratings
Integrates with Google Drive8.014 Ratings00 Ratings
Device sync8.525 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Microsoft Viva EngageTeamspective
Small Businesses
Stackby
Stackby
Score 9.0 out of 10
Sogolytics
Sogolytics
Score 9.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Troop Messenger
Troop Messenger
Score 9.8 out of 10
Bonusly
Bonusly
Score 9.5 out of 10
Enterprises
HCL Connections
HCL Connections
Score 9.0 out of 10
Nexthink
Nexthink
Score 7.5 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Microsoft Viva EngageTeamspective
Likelihood to Recommend
8.4
(55 ratings)
9.1
(2 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
9.0
(11 ratings)
9.1
(1 ratings)
Usability
8.0
(5 ratings)
9.1
(1 ratings)
Availability
8.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Performance
9.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
7.0
(12 ratings)
9.1
(2 ratings)
Online Training
7.0
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
8.0
(1 ratings)
9.1
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
Microsoft Viva EngageTeamspective
Likelihood to Recommend
Microsoft
Yammer is great when you have a company culture that encourages friendly collaboration and communication. It can be a great supplement (but certainly not a substitute) for bonding and sharing ideas and thoughts. Certain channels can be really successful, too, like a channel where people can post dog pictures or something fun like that!
Read full review
Teamspective
I have also recommended Teamspective many times! I think it's the best choice for a modern organisation who wants to support its people to take responsibility for their learning & development and not just passively wait for managers to do that. Teamspective integrates very well with Slack, so I recommend it to everyone who wants to have the feedback tool as a part of their other tools that are already used daily by the employees.
Read full review
Pros
Microsoft
  • Providing a platform for social news in the company where "bottom up" topics can percolate freely across department
  • Social networking across the company where folks can divide their work into topics instead of teams
  • Basic collaboration within a group including document sharing with ability to pin documents to a team
Read full review
Teamspective
  • Easy of use
  • In-depth analytics based not only on direct question to answer, but the broad analytics database in background that links the questions to scientifically studied relations to broader analytics. As an example the importance of feedback and its correlation to motivation and wellbeing
  • Ease of implementation
  • Constant development of the tool in collaboration with other customers and Teamspective
  • Customer support and customer relationship management by the whole Teamspective team from Founders to developers
Read full review
Cons
Microsoft
  • Although the social enterprise network works very well, there is room for some slight improvement - such as the ability to attract users. By being part of the Microsoft Office Suite, it is offered as an "add-on" and many overlook it and see it as unnecessary at first. It would be smart for Microsoft to sell it as its own product so it could gather more popularity as a "social network".
  • Giving an option to filter results could be better as well as giving an option to turn off the "recent activity" bar on the home page.
Read full review
Teamspective
  • Performance evaluation feature that would match perfectly with project-based organisation needs (I think all feedback tools should improve in this!)
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Microsoft
Microsoft is dedicated to continual improvement on Yammer. They realize the value that Yammer brings to the table with their clients. In the short time that we have had Yammer implemented, we are just now beginning to see the strong impact it has on becoming more effective and efficient around collaboration.
Read full review
Teamspective
tool has been shown to be exactly what we have wished for and the constant collaboration and development together with Teamspective and other customer community supports that we should and we are continuing the collaboration with them in the future as well
Read full review
Usability
Microsoft
Overall easy to use and intuitive, although limited in the possibility to personalize layout and look & feel of a site. Some functionalities are not easy to use, like document editing, but some others are quick and effective (posts and tagging above all). Performance and responsiveness of the Yammer site is typically acceptable, in my experience.
Read full review
Teamspective
Teamspecitve does not need heavy support organisation and tool it self is very self guiding. We have only 2 main administrators for the tool and the need from these perosons is very minimal. Tool provides easy to use interface and one glance reports from team to company level in one page. Our survey reponse rates in whole company levels are constantly around 85-90%, so it gives good analytics on the current status in multiple areas.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
Microsoft
Very available
Read full review
Teamspective
No answers on this topic
Performance
Microsoft
It's a simple product but it does provide value.
Read full review
Teamspective
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Microsoft
We have never had to use the support for Yammer. The tool works well and we have not come across any bugs. User Interface is simple and easy to use, similar to other forum type products, thereby removing the need for any extensive training. Team members are invited in and immediately are able to start using the tool.
Read full review
Teamspective
Teamspective answers quickly and really puts an effort to fix a problem. There have been several requests for the product to support our use cases that Teamspective has made true.
Read full review
Online Training
Microsoft
The training that Microsoft provides is very generic training for Yammer. I like the fact the training is short and easy to understand
Read full review
Teamspective
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
Microsoft
We organically implemented the product
Read full review
Teamspective
Involve key users from day one as in any implementation project. Describe the need, benefit and use cases for easier implementation. Communicate actively
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Microsoft
Our team briefly used Salesforce.com's Chatter product before switching over to Yammer in 2012. While Chatter is essentially the same product as Yammer, it left much to be desired. Chatter's design was (and remains) clunky and difficult to navigate. Yammer is a simple, easy-to-use product that offers similar functionality as Salesforce's Chatter.
Read full review
Teamspective
We did a wide comparison and ended up using Teamspective as we felt that they are offering exactly those features we needed but nothing "extra," meaning we only pay for the things we need. Also, Teamspective seemed simple enough, and on the other hand, we appreciated their strong investments in developing the product based on customer feedback. The biggest differentiator to the average feedback tools is that Teamspective is not manager-led, so employees will become masters of their own development.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Microsoft
  • My company is pleased with the positive impact Yammer has created departmentally and on an individual basis with work flow efficiency.
  • Adversely, most old and new employees are more familiar with SharePoint, causing the company to pay for training for all current and incoming employees.
  • As Yammer becomes more widely used, the need for training may diminish, which is where we will see our return on investment, as the product clearly provides a more effective form of file sharing and communication between employees and their department.
Read full review
Teamspective
  • Teamspective has helped in building our feedback culture, which is often mentioned by our employees as one of the positive things in the company.
  • Teamspective helps our people give professional-level feedback independently, effectively, and respectfully. Feedback skills are important for any professional today.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Teamspective Screenshots

Screenshot of Answer engagement surveys directly in Slack or MS teams (in under 30 seconds).Screenshot of Provide personalized coaching, task automation, and conversational guidance to each manager with platform's AI functionality.Screenshot of Run effective 360 rounds inside Slack.Screenshot of Improve 1:1s quality and use data-based discussion points (Engagement, 360 Feedback, Network).Screenshot of Overlay engagement and performance data with network insights.Screenshot of Create anonymous feedback inboxes in Slack. Each customizable inbox has it’s own purpose, recipients, protocol, and user guidance.