Miro vs. Timestamp
Miro vs. Timestamp
Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
---|---|---|---|---|
Miro | N/A | Miro provides a visual workspace for innovation that enables distributed teams of any size to dream, design, and build the future together. Today, Miro counts more than 60 million users in 200,000 organizations who use Miro to improve product development collaboration, to speed up time to market, and to make sure that new products and services deliver on customer needs. | $8 per month per user | |
Timestamp | N/A | Timestamp is a project tracking tool that provides cost, revenue and profitability analysis. The tool is focused on helping project oriented business such as software consultancies and web design agencies run more efficiently. Users can import or track their time and expenses and Timestamp does the number crunching and provides real time data. The tool integrates with FreeAgent. The vendor says that integration with FreeAgent allows them to provide… | $0 |
Miro | Timestamp | |||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Editions & Modules |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
Entry-level Setup Fee | Optional | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
Additional Details | — | Each user is priced at GBP 3.50 / month for our Standard plan with the first user priced at £7.50 (5.49 USD and 11.77 USD respectively) | ||||||||||||||
More Pricing Information |
Miro | Timestamp | |
---|---|---|
Top Pros |
|
|
Top Cons |
| No answers on this topic |
Miro | Timestamp | |
---|---|---|
Small Businesses | Lucid Visual Collaboration Suite Score 8.6 out of 10 | FunctionFox Score 8.3 out of 10 |
Medium-sized Companies | Lucid Visual Collaboration Suite Score 8.6 out of 10 | SAP Ruum Score 9.0 out of 10 |
Enterprises | Lucid Visual Collaboration Suite Score 8.6 out of 10 | Quickbase Score 9.2 out of 10 |
All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
Miro | Timestamp | |
---|---|---|
Likelihood to Recommend | 9.0 (4535 ratings) | - (0 ratings) |
Likelihood to Renew | 9.0 (97 ratings) | - (0 ratings) |
Usability | 8.0 (71 ratings) | - (0 ratings) |
Availability | 8.8 (8 ratings) | - (0 ratings) |
Performance | 8.8 (7 ratings) | - (0 ratings) |
Support Rating | 6.5 (26 ratings) | - (0 ratings) |
Online Training | 9.7 (4 ratings) | - (0 ratings) |
Implementation Rating | 8.6 (3290 ratings) | - (0 ratings) |
Configurability | 9.8 (3 ratings) | - (0 ratings) |
Ease of integration | 7.4 (3630 ratings) | - (0 ratings) |
Product Scalability | 9.0 (8 ratings) | - (0 ratings) |
Vendor post-sale | 10.0 (1 ratings) | - (0 ratings) |
Vendor pre-sale | 8.0 (1 ratings) | - (0 ratings) |
Miro | Timestamp | |
---|---|---|
Likelihood to Recommend | Miro | Red Sequence Ltd. No answers on this topic |
Pros | Miro | Red Sequence Ltd. No answers on this topic |
Cons | Miro | Red Sequence Ltd. No answers on this topic |
Likelihood to Renew | Miro | Red Sequence Ltd. No answers on this topic |
Usability | Miro | Red Sequence Ltd. No answers on this topic |
Reliability and Availability | Miro | Red Sequence Ltd. No answers on this topic |
Performance | Miro | Red Sequence Ltd. No answers on this topic |
Support Rating | Miro | Red Sequence Ltd. No answers on this topic |
In-Person Training | Miro | Red Sequence Ltd. No answers on this topic |
Online Training | Miro | Red Sequence Ltd. No answers on this topic |
Implementation Rating | Miro | Red Sequence Ltd. No answers on this topic |
Alternatives Considered | Miro | Red Sequence Ltd. No answers on this topic |
Scalability | Miro | Red Sequence Ltd. No answers on this topic |
Return on Investment | Miro | Red Sequence Ltd. No answers on this topic |
ScreenShots | Miro Screenshots | Timestamp Screenshots |