Miro vs. Zvolv
Miro vs. Zvolv
Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
---|---|---|---|---|
Miro | N/A | Miro provides a visual workspace for innovation that enables distributed teams of any size to dream, design, and build the future together. Today, Miro counts more than 60 million users in 200,000 organizations who use Miro to improve product development collaboration, to speed up time to market, and to make sure that new products and services deliver on customer needs. | $8 per month per user | |
Zvolv | Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees) | The Zvolv Platform automates and adds structure to chaotic people/data-centric collaboration processes, helping drive organizational efficiency and faster time to market. Whether it's opening new outlets/stores, launching new products, distributed data collection and business intelligence, or machine data-driven workflows - Zvolv applications can be created in a matter of days, with no developer dependence. Unlike traditionally developed software applications, with the no-code workflow… | N/A |
Miro | Zvolv | |||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Editions & Modules |
| No answers on this topic | ||||||||||||||
Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
Entry-level Setup Fee | Optional | $3,000 per workflow | ||||||||||||||
Additional Details | — | — | ||||||||||||||
More Pricing Information |
Miro | Zvolv | |
---|---|---|
Top Pros |
| No answers on this topic |
Top Cons |
| No answers on this topic |
Miro | Zvolv | |
---|---|---|
Small Businesses | Lucid Visual Collaboration Suite Score 8.6 out of 10 | Stackby Score 9.8 out of 10 |
Medium-sized Companies | Lucid Visual Collaboration Suite Score 8.6 out of 10 | SAP Ruum Score 9.0 out of 10 |
Enterprises | Lucid Visual Collaboration Suite Score 8.6 out of 10 | Quickbase Score 9.2 out of 10 |
All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
Miro | Zvolv | |
---|---|---|
Likelihood to Recommend | 9.0 (4543 ratings) | - (0 ratings) |
Likelihood to Renew | 9.0 (98 ratings) | - (0 ratings) |
Usability | 8.1 (72 ratings) | - (0 ratings) |
Availability | 8.8 (8 ratings) | - (0 ratings) |
Performance | 8.8 (7 ratings) | - (0 ratings) |
Support Rating | 6.4 (27 ratings) | - (0 ratings) |
Online Training | 9.7 (4 ratings) | - (0 ratings) |
Implementation Rating | 8.6 (3291 ratings) | - (0 ratings) |
Configurability | 9.8 (3 ratings) | - (0 ratings) |
Ease of integration | 7.4 (3633 ratings) | - (0 ratings) |
Product Scalability | 9.0 (8 ratings) | - (0 ratings) |
Vendor post-sale | 10.0 (1 ratings) | - (0 ratings) |
Vendor pre-sale | 8.0 (1 ratings) | - (0 ratings) |
Miro | Zvolv | |
---|---|---|
Likelihood to Recommend | Miro | Zestl No answers on this topic |
Pros | Miro | Zestl No answers on this topic |
Cons | Miro | Zestl No answers on this topic |
Likelihood to Renew | Miro | Zestl No answers on this topic |
Usability | Miro | Zestl No answers on this topic |
Reliability and Availability | Miro | Zestl No answers on this topic |
Performance | Miro | Zestl No answers on this topic |
Support Rating | Miro | Zestl No answers on this topic |
In-Person Training | Miro | Zestl No answers on this topic |
Online Training | Miro | Zestl No answers on this topic |
Implementation Rating | Miro | Zestl No answers on this topic |
Alternatives Considered | Miro | Zestl No answers on this topic |
Scalability | Miro | Zestl No answers on this topic |
Return on Investment | Miro | Zestl No answers on this topic |
ScreenShots | Miro Screenshots | Zvolv Screenshots |