monday dev vs. Optimizely Feature Experimentation

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
monday dev
Score 8.3 out of 10
N/A
monday dev is a product to plan, track, and ship software while staying connected to the business, featuring AI capabilities that allow it to analyze bugs as they are submitted, summarize product documents, and automatically assign tasks.
$12
per month per seat
Optimizely Feature Experimentation
Score 8.3 out of 10
N/A
Optimizely Feature Experimentation unites feature flagging, A/B testing, and built-in collaboration—so marketers can release, experiment, and optimize with confidence in one platform.N/A
Pricing
monday devOptimizely Feature Experimentation
Editions & Modules
Basic
$12
per month per seat
Standard
$14.5
per month per seat
Pro
$25
per month per seat
Enterprise
Contact Sales
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
monday devOptimizely Feature Experimentation
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeRequired
Additional DetailsPlans start at 3 seats. Yearly save 18%
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
monday devOptimizely Feature Experimentation
Considered Both Products
monday dev
Chose monday dev
Monday is better than Jobber, as it gives you a place to see where all the jobs are and what the current status is. Everyone in the company can go to and see that view. It's not dependent on the status of the employee. Excel is much more technical and requires much more work to …
Chose monday dev
It is at least as good as these tools, in many ways, it is better because it is easier to use and setup. It doesn't require a full-time admin like these tools do. It does lack some of the detailed reporting and such that these offer, but the product is still young and growing. …
Chose monday dev
We selected it because of our previous positive experience with monday dev. In addition, it gave us more options to tie in other parts of our business so it’s under one umbrella and then further automate things. The over tracking and monitoring ability is far better than others …
Chose monday dev
I think that overall the way that monday dev stands out among its competitors is the great design layout and also its ease of use. Most platforms have so many steps when editing a project or customizing its view, and when you work with monday dev, you are able to customize it …
Optimizely Feature Experimentation
Chose Optimizely Feature Experimentation
In previous companies I've used Monetate which is a similar A/B testing kind of feature experimentation engine that is very similar from my memory, but again, back to the point of these new features of the analytics engine and Opal, it kind of cuts it above Monetate from my …
Chose Optimizely Feature Experimentation
I wasn’t part of the team that selected Optimizely, but its integrations with other tools were a big plus for us in making our decision. It was more expensive, however.
Chose Optimizely Feature Experimentation
We have not used any other similar tools, we evaluated both Kameleoon and VWO. With the combination of price, features, and expandability, we moved forward with Optimizely Feature Experimentation.
Chose Optimizely Feature Experimentation
Google optimize is great that it is an add on to an existing Analytics implementation, but only has a web version. Optimizely has the SDK so better option for testing new features
Chose Optimizely Feature Experimentation
We selected Optimizely as it was easy to use/understand, had clearly defined SLAs for keeping the platform up and was regarded as resilient within the industry. We needed something at our point in our experimentation journey that could be used for Product testing at scale and …
Chose Optimizely Feature Experimentation
Optimizely Feature Experimentation has similar features to Amplitude. As a matter of fact it looks like Amplitude copied Optimizely. However, Amplitude did not mimic the nomenclature issues.
Chose Optimizely Feature Experimentation
When Google Optimize goes off we searched for a tool where you can be sure to get a good GA4 implementation and easy to use for IT team and product team.

Optimizely Feature Experimentation seems to have a good balance between pricing and capabilities.
Chose Optimizely Feature Experimentation
In other companies, all of the feature flag controls were done locally and it got messy after a while. There was no much control on who was doing what. With Optimizely Feature Experimentation, it is clear what feature flags are enabled and which ones are not. It is easier to …
Chose Optimizely Feature Experimentation
not too much experience on that to answer this question
Chose Optimizely Feature Experimentation
There is a lot more flexibility with Optimizely once you have customized the implementation and better tools.
Chose Optimizely Feature Experimentation
WebX and FeatureX work well in pair, they organically complement each other
Chose Optimizely Feature Experimentation
Simple interface and ability to create audiences and assign them to experiments.
Chose Optimizely Feature Experimentation
Optimizely offered both web experimentation (WSYWIG editor for nontechnical marketing folks) and Feature Experimentation. That made the decision easier to get max value across different stakeholder groups.
Chose Optimizely Feature Experimentation
Optimizely FX is the only tool I've used that specifically allows for testing in the back-end. Most front end tools are great for simple tests, but there comes a time when you need to go a level deeper and that's not possible with front-end tools.
Chose Optimizely Feature Experimentation
Mixpanel, Google Analytics, Hotjar and A/B Smartly
Chose Optimizely Feature Experimentation
With the Netspring acquisition I think it's closer to its competitor's features
Chose Optimizely Feature Experimentation
I prefer Optimizely Feature Experimentation to web experimentation. I think it's more straightforward to set up and as an engineer, I like being able to have more control from the code side.
Chose Optimizely Feature Experimentation
we wanted a shift with the tool that helps us with managing our data
Chose Optimizely Feature Experimentation
We haven't evaluated other products. We have an in-house product that is missing a lot of features and is very behind from making the test process easier.

Instead of evolving our in-house product with limited resources, we decided to go with Optimizely Feature Experimentation …
Chose Optimizely Feature Experimentation
Overall, Optimizely Feature Experimentation is an industry leader in terms of experimentation across web and mobile. For apps I would say amplitude does slightly a better job as it is tailored to that niche.
Chose Optimizely Feature Experimentation
Optimizely Feature Experimentation is better for building more complex experiments than Optimizely Web. However, Optimizely Web is much easier to kickstart your experimentation program with as the learning curve is much lower, and dedicated developer resources are not always …
Chose Optimizely Feature Experimentation
Optimizely Feature Experimentation is less of a point solution than LaunchDarkly, so LD has a few extra features, but Optimizely offers a much greater solution for experimentation, personalization etc.
Chose Optimizely Feature Experimentation
Feature experimentation is much more robust and allows more granular control over the decisions you want to make. While Optimizely Feature Experimentation is nice and can be delivered via Optimizely Feature Experimentation's UI, its still not ideal because its brittle and can …
Features
monday devOptimizely Feature Experimentation
Project Management
Comparison of Project Management features of Product A and Product B
monday dev
8.0
Ratings
7% above category average
Optimizely Feature Experimentation
-
Ratings
Task Management8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Resource Management8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Gantt Charts8.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Scheduling7.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Support for Agile Methodology7.80 Ratings00 Ratings
Support for Waterfall Methodology7.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Document Management8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Email integration7.80 Ratings00 Ratings
Mobile Access8.20 Ratings00 Ratings
Timesheet Tracking7.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Change request and Case Management7.80 Ratings00 Ratings
Budget and Expense Management7.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Search7.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Visual planning tools7.70 Ratings00 Ratings
Agile Development
Comparison of Agile Development features of Product A and Product B
monday dev
7.8
Ratings
0% above category average
Optimizely Feature Experimentation
-
Ratings
DevOps Tool Integrations7.40 Ratings00 Ratings
Code Review8.40 Ratings00 Ratings
Code Collaboration8.30 Ratings00 Ratings
Velocity Calculation8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Dependencies and Blockers6.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
monday devOptimizely Feature Experimentation
Small Businesses
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.8 out of 10
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.8 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Planview AgilePlace
Planview AgilePlace
Score 7.9 out of 10
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.8 out of 10
Enterprises
Planview AgilePlace
Planview AgilePlace
Score 7.9 out of 10
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.8 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
monday devOptimizely Feature Experimentation
Likelihood to Recommend
8.5
(0 ratings)
8.2
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
9.0
(0 ratings)
4.5
(0 ratings)
Usability
7.9
(0 ratings)
7.6
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
8.1
(0 ratings)
3.6
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
8.0
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
-
(0 ratings)
5.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
monday devOptimizely Feature Experimentation
Likelihood to Recommend
If you do web programming, code integration with your remote team, and/or software development that requires real-time monitoring of development progress, monday dev is an excellent tool for this. Like its base platform, Monday.com, monday dev is developed and attempts to integrate into a very "new era" organizational system of digital whiteboards, only now focused more on productivity and helping developers to be comfortable in remote work.
Read full review
Based on my experience with Optimizely Feature Experimentation, I can highlight several scenarios where it excels and a few where it may be less suitable. Well-suited scenarios: - Multi-Channel product launches - Complex A/B testing and feature flag management - Gradual rollout and risk mitigation Less suited scenarios: - Simple A/B tests (their Web Experimentation product is probably better for that) - Non-technical team usage -
Read full review
Pros
  • Tracking
  • Changing Status
  • Backlog
Read full review
  • Splitting traffic between variants and enabling you to scale up or down the amount of traffic in each one
  • Giving a standardised report that you can share with a huge number of users
  • Showing a large variety of results/metrics you can then dive into
Read full review
Cons
  • Sometimes, it's a little technical to set up. Someone who isn't particularly savvy will have a hard time setting it up.
  • Sometimes there are glitches in the automations.
  • The comments areas can be confusing- how they nest. Things can get lost in there.
Read full review
  • Difficult integration if your data is not front end
  • Costly MAU model needs to be based on experiments not on site visits
  • It's not easy to understand how to build an Experiment
  • Onboarding team is more focused on punching through their slides and not focused on your needs or understanding.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
We are very likely to renew, because it has been really useful
Read full review
Competitive landscape
Read full review
Usability
This has been one of the better software implementations and acquisitions that I have been a part of in the last 20 years. The ease of setup, use, and training make this a simple and quick tool to implement in any organization. The usability is so simple that the uptime to start using it is nearly 0.
Read full review
Easy to navigate the UI. Once you know how to use it, it is very easy to run experiments. And when the experiment is setup, the SDK code variables are generated and available for developers to use immediately so they can quickly build the experiment code
Read full review
Support Rating
Good engagement from account manager
Read full review
Support was there but it was pretty slow at most times. Only after escalation was support really given to our teams
Read full review
Implementation Rating
No I wasn't involved
Read full review
It’s straightforward. Docs are well written and I believe there must be a support. But we haven’t used it
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Monday is better than Jobber, as it gives you a place to see where all the jobs are and what the current status is. Everyone in the company can go to and see that view. It's not dependent on the status of the employee. Excel is much more technical and requires much more work to set up.
Read full review
In previous companies I've used Monetate which is a similar A/B testing kind of feature experimentation engine that is very similar from my memory, but again, back to the point of these new features of the analytics engine and Opal, it kind of cuts it above Monetate from my experience. Obviously Monetate may have improved since when I lost use it, but from what I can see, yeah.
Read full review
Scalability
No answers on this topic
had troubles with performance for SSR and the React SDK
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Although the initial operational cost is usually somewhat high, it is really worth considering in an environment with more than 10 employees working together.
  • In project costing (web development) it is quite acceptable and falls within the scope of the final product quote.
  • I don't have exact numbers or percentages (because I'm not in charge of that section) but I can say that it falls within a good to acceptable ROI range.
Read full review
  • We have improved various metrics throughout the course of our experimentation program with Optimizely and therefore sharing numbers is tricky. Essentially we only implement versions of the product that perform the best in terms of CVR, revenue/visitor, ATV, average order value, average basket size and so forth dependent on the north star we are trying to move with each release.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Optimizely Feature Experimentation Screenshots

Screenshot of Feature Flag Setup. Here users can run A/B and multi-armed bandit tests, as well as:

- Set up a single feature flag to test multiple variations and experiment types
- Enable targeted deliveries and rollouts for more precise experimentation
- Roll back changes quickly when needed to ensure experiment accuracy and reduce risks
- Increase testing flexibility with control over experiment types and delivery methodsScreenshot of Audience Setup. This is used to target specific user segments for personalized experiments, and:

- Create and customize audiences based on user attributes
- Refine audience segments to ensure the right users are included in tests
- Enhance experiment relevance by setting specific conditions for user groupsScreenshot of Experiment Results, supporting the analysis and optimization of experimentation outcomes. Viewers can also:

- examine detailed experiment results, including key metrics like conversion rates and statistical significance
- Compare variations side-by-side to identify winning treatments
- Use advanced filters to segment and drill down into specific audience or test dataScreenshot of A Program Overview. These offer insights into any experimentation program’s performance. It also offers:

- A comprehensive view of the entire experimentation program’s status and progress
- Monitoring for key performance metrics like test velocity, success rates, and overall impact
- Evaluation of the impact of experiments with easy-to-read visualizations and reporting tools
- Performance tracking of experiments over time to guide decision-making and optimize strategiesScreenshot of AI Variable Suggestions. These enhance experimentation with AI-driven insights, and can also help with:

- Generating multiple content variations with AI to speed up experiment design
- Improving test quality with content suggestions
- Increasing experimentation velocity and achieving better outcomes with AI-powered optimizationScreenshot of Schedule Changes, to streamline experimentation. Users can also:

- Set specific times to toggle flags or rules on/off, ensuring precise control
- Schedule traffic allocation percentages for smooth experiment rollouts
- Increase test velocity and confidence by automating progressive changes