Nectar Desk is call center software for a variety of industries. It includes a suite of call center software features such as call recording, IVRs and call transfers. Additionally, it integrates with CRM platforms in order to ensure that agents can work efficiently between Nectar Desk and their CRM. It also has advanced agent analytics which allow users to analyze their agents’ performance and make staffing adjustments as necessary.
$50
per month 1 agent
Salesforce Agentforce Service
Score 8.6 out of 10
N/A
Service Cloud is a customer service platform that helps businesses manage and resolve customer inquiries and issues. It provides tools for case management, knowledge base, omni-channel support, automation, and analytics, enabling companies to deliver exceptional customer service experiences.
$25
per month
Pricing
Nectar Desk
Salesforce Agentforce Service
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Starter Suite
$25
per month
Pro Suite
$100
per month per user
Enterprise
$165
per month per user
Unlimited
$330
per month per user
Agentforce 1
$550
per month per user
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Nectar Desk
Salesforce Agentforce Service
Free Trial
Yes
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
Yes
Yes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Nectar Desk
Salesforce Agentforce Service
Features
Nectar Desk
Salesforce Agentforce Service
Contact Center Software
Comparison of Contact Center Software features of Product A and Product B
Nectar Desk
9.2
1 Ratings
10% above category average
Salesforce Agentforce Service
-
Ratings
Agent dashboard
9.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Validate callers
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Outbound response
9.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Call forwarding
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Click-to-call (CTC)
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Warm transfer
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Predictive dialing
9.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Interactive voice response
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
REST APIs
9.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Call scripts
9.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Call tracking
9.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Multichannel integration
8.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
CRM software integration
8.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Workforce Optimization (WFO)
Comparison of Workforce Optimization (WFO) features of Product A and Product B
Nectar Desk
8.6
1 Ratings
4% above category average
Salesforce Agentforce Service
-
Ratings
Inbound call routing
9.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Omnichannel inbound routing
8.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Recording
9.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Quality management
9.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Call analytics
8.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Historical reporting
8.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Live reporting
9.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Customer interaction analytics
9.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Incident and problem management
Comparison of Incident and problem management features of Product A and Product B
Nectar Desk
-
Ratings
Salesforce Agentforce Service
8.4
81 Ratings
2% above category average
Organize and prioritize service tickets
00 Ratings
8.779 Ratings
Expert directory
00 Ratings
8.157 Ratings
Subscription-based notifications
00 Ratings
8.467 Ratings
ITSM collaboration and documentation
00 Ratings
7.662 Ratings
Ticket creation and submission
00 Ratings
8.979 Ratings
Ticket response
00 Ratings
8.478 Ratings
Self Help Community
Comparison of Self Help Community features of Product A and Product B
Nectar Desk
-
Ratings
Salesforce Agentforce Service
8.7
76 Ratings
8% above category average
External knowledge base
00 Ratings
8.567 Ratings
Internal knowledge base
00 Ratings
8.874 Ratings
Multi-Channel Help
Comparison of Multi-Channel Help features of Product A and Product B
I would recommend Nectar Desk if you are going to launch it across an entire organization. By launching for only one department, it has been extremely difficult to not have the connectivity we want across the entire company.
I think Service Cloud is best suited for medium to large operations that require both proactive and reactive service. It’s a great fit for post-sales support. However, I wouldn’t recommend it for very small companies because it can be quite costly, and many of the features may go unused. Salesforce also performs best when you have a capable team managing it, so it’s important to consider your organization’s size and readiness before starting. Once you do, I recommend exploring other parts of the Salesforce ecosystem—Service Cloud works even better when integrated with Sales Cloud, since it allows better visibility across teams.
Customizing Multiple Ring Groups: Allows for different call routing options depending on what phone number is dialed by a caller
Agent Login Tracking & Analytics: I can see minute by minute details of my team's login status and better understand how they're using their time
IVR Set Up: I can set up and edit/change IVR settings with the click of a few buttons, it's super easy!
Call History Tracking: I can easily filter and view all calls for the day to see what was inbound vs outbound, how many calls were handled by each agent, how many calls were missed, how many were outside of business hours, what the dispositions for each call were, and MORE. The Call History analytics are GREAT.
Email to case is an interesting piece of it. The threading is very strong, sometimes too strong, but it does very well at handling the incoming emails.
The omnichannel routing, using skill-based routing is really effective.
Pathing. So making the workflow and helping the team understand what it is that they're trying to do, what they have to accomplish, those step-by-step pieces. That's really helpful.
When a caller becomes assigned to an agent, SMS notifications are only sent to that agent. This is difficult for our call center manager to monitor if the team is handling all SMS replies efficiently and effectively.
Because Nectar Desk is a chrome-based calling software, we are limited in accessing the platform. Due to the ongoing pandemic, this presented a challenge in making sure that all agents' at-home computers were capable of running the software.
We had a principle initially to try and use Omni as much as we can from the user experience perspective, but have found that fairly restrictive. It was very difficult to actually get the right customer experience and customer engagement going. So we're actually on a journey at the moment to replace all of our Omni with Lightning web components that gives us that flexibility. That's probably one area where we've had some challenges in terms of how we've used the product out of the box.
Professional edition works best for a small company with lower call volumes and is very useful but as you grow exponetially I think it has limited ability to do all the things we want to - SLA management, defect, release management to name a few. Reports and dashboards being available in real time.
I had Salesforce experience prior to using Service Cloud which made it a little easier to learn and navigate, but overall my team (some who had no Salesforce experience) caught on very quickly and found Service Cloud to be easy to use.
Working on an application that caters to customer needs requires a platform that acts as a mediator between the actual person and the client. This mediator handles the customer and resolves many of their doubts, helps them map through the entire process, and automates the processes. Such a platform is Salesforce Service Cloud. For queries that cannot be serviced by the platform, it creates a separate ServiceNow ticket for us, and it is assigned.
The Salesforce Service Cloud generally has very good performance, however the overall new Lightning user experience can bring that down. For example, if you have too many tabs open, then it can take a while for the Lightning UI to load. This UI is probably not well equipped to handle loading of all of that information at once, but Users tend to leave their tabs open all day long. It can also be fickle depending on which browser you use, what extensions you have installed, and whether you've cleared your cache. This can be the downfall with any software as a service though, not just Salesforce
Salesforce offers support, although it generally gets routed to overseas support teams first, and once they are unable to help, it gets escalated up the chain to higher tiers. Frequently, the answer back from support is that there is no native solution, and we either have to turn to the AppExchange for some solution provided by another developer, or custom build our own solution.
Our in-person training was provided by our implementation partner and it was quite good. This was in part because we were already working with them and so it naturally leant itself to a good training relationship. And because they were building our customizations and configuring things, they could then provide training on those things naturally.
Trailheads are great but it was often unclear what actually applied to our organization. This made it difficult to get a whole lot out of it. Part of it is that because the basic Salesforce features didn't quite work for us, we had to add customizations, which then nullified a lot of the training.
I would go through an implementation very differently knowing what I know now. It was difficult coming from systems we liked in post-sales service and having to adapt to the clunky and underwhelming feature set in Salesforce. I would trim back our expectations
We selected this product because we already had some competencies in Salesforce. We own a Salesforce partner with expertise in this area, and on top of that, Salesforce purchased it — it was originally called Velocity. When Salesforce decided to acquire it, that finalized the decision for us.
As the marketing agency that implemented this software for a client, we have 100% insight into call performance. Our client previously throughout random numbers, was always guessing on his team's performance, and now we have actual insight into how the intake team is truly performing—we know 100% of the inbound calls they make, how many outbound calls are made in a day, and how much time is spent 'idle'. This has allowed our client to hire the appropriate number of call center staff based on actual data and has allowed us to shift our marketing budget to focus on driving the right callers.
We have cut our service team in half over the past 5 years due to the efficiency of the tool
The amount of direct inquiries to our technical team is less than 10% compared to the number support tickets that get entered in the system for them to work in a more organized manner
Responses are 100% more timely because tickets can be responded to by any individual in the queue or on the team, as opposed to direct emails to just one person