NetApp SaaS Backup vs. Spanning Backup

My favorite feature of cloud data management is that it's simple to get all the business reports and analytics I need from a variety of data sources in a matter of minutes. As far as I'm concerned, it's the finest I've come across in terms of backup and safe access control.

Incentivized

The only issue we have is when we remove the user from the integrated AD group we need to manually go back and remove the licensing, but there is the option to have archived accounts as well for temporary holds in case we want to disable the account in 365/AD, but need to hold on to the backups for a little longer.

Incentivized

• Restores and searches are simple to carry out.
• Very simple to use design.
• Complex data recovery.

Incentivized

• Set it and forget it. Easy set up and it runs daily behind the scenes.
• Restore holds record relationships.
• Restore can merge records easily.

Incentivized

• The process of securing the transfer of large amounts of data is difficult.
• At times, keeping track of several data backups might be complicated.
• Powerful devices are needed to recover data from the Cloud.

Incentivized

• Better support/phone support
• The ability to checkmark JUST a single OU and then any new members in just THAT OU would be automatically backed up. Currently, you can just auto add new members but not per OU.

Incentivized

It was hands down, one of the easiest solutions to implement overall and has some of the best features also compared to other similar products from many SaaS backup companies. We also integrated the Dark Web monitoring too and it has helped us secure accounts we didn't know had issues, so has improved our security posture too.

Incentivized

I would like a retention option on the data, but since this feature does not currently exist, I give it a 9. Everything has met our standards and needs and we are now freed up from the manual efforts it was taking for backing up Salesforce using the out-of-the-box features of Salesforce.

Incentivized

We utilize it to implement database and cloud backups. It's a lot more efficient than Rubrik, for example. SLA domains can be used to establish backup and retention depending on business requirements because of the high frequency of backups. Additionally, NetApp SaaS Backup provides a constant cloud product backup.

Incentivized

Spanning is superior to Veritas Backup Exec. Often Backup Exec would fail due to the software itself or the premise-based backup media or drive. Veritas Tech Support/Knowledgebase was not helpful in troubleshooting the failures. Also, Veritas was unable to back up our then Microsoft Exchange Server without an additional add-on cost. Barracuda was more reliable, but also required additional expenses for backing up Exchange and Microsoft SQL.

Incentivized

• Cloud-based data loss management tools make data recovery a breeze.
• Data management for consumers is straightforward and good.
• Solutions for archiving and extracting data quickly.

Incentivized

• Allowed us to restore our data various times with minimal costs
• Gives us great piece of mind with the regular scheduled backing up
• Pretty simple to set up and configure. Easy integration with SFDC

Incentivized