Netskope Private Access vs. SecureLink Enterprise Access

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Netskope Private Access
Score 9.2 out of 10
N/A
Netskope Private Access is a zero trust access solution, that allows users to provide remote access to applications running in the public cloud and private data center environments, and avoid the need for remote users to use a VPN through the corporate network to gain access to private applications.N/A
SecureLink Enterprise Access
Score 9.4 out of 10
N/A
SecureLink is a platform for remote support in regulated industries. Enterprise software vendors use SecureLink to deliver remote support and services. Hospitals, banks, casinos and other regulated entities use SecureLink to authenticate, control and audit remote access for their vendors, business associates and other 3rd parties.N/A
Pricing
Netskope Private AccessSecureLink Enterprise Access
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Netskope Private AccessSecureLink Enterprise Access
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Netskope Private AccessSecureLink Enterprise Access
Features
Netskope Private AccessSecureLink Enterprise Access
Identity Management
Comparison of Identity Management features of Product A and Product B
Netskope Private Access
10.0
2 Ratings
12% above category average
SecureLink Enterprise Access
-
Ratings
Multi-Factor Authentication10.02 Ratings00 Ratings
Endpoint Security
Comparison of Endpoint Security features of Product A and Product B
Netskope Private Access
7.5
3 Ratings
19% below category average
SecureLink Enterprise Access
-
Ratings
Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)7.53 Ratings00 Ratings
Threat Intelligence
Comparison of Threat Intelligence features of Product A and Product B
Netskope Private Access
6.8
4 Ratings
13% below category average
SecureLink Enterprise Access
-
Ratings
Network Analytics7.04 Ratings00 Ratings
Threat Recognition7.04 Ratings00 Ratings
Vulnerability Classification7.04 Ratings00 Ratings
Automated Alerts and Reporting7.74 Ratings00 Ratings
Threat Analysis6.04 Ratings00 Ratings
Threat Intelligence Reporting6.74 Ratings00 Ratings
Automated Threat Identification6.34 Ratings00 Ratings
Zero Trust Security
Comparison of Zero Trust Security features of Product A and Product B
Netskope Private Access
7.8
4 Ratings
11% below category average
SecureLink Enterprise Access
-
Ratings
Continuous Verification8.04 Ratings00 Ratings
Secure Web Gateways8.04 Ratings00 Ratings
Network Flow Control7.34 Ratings00 Ratings
Network Traffic Analysis9.04 Ratings00 Ratings
Segmentation Leveraging6.74 Ratings00 Ratings
Admin Access Control9.04 Ratings00 Ratings
Network Data Encryption7.34 Ratings00 Ratings
Network Topology Mapping7.03 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Netskope Private AccessSecureLink Enterprise Access
Small Businesses
ThreatLocker
ThreatLocker
Score 9.4 out of 10
ThreatLocker
ThreatLocker
Score 9.4 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access
Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access
Score 8.3 out of 10
Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access
Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access
Score 8.3 out of 10
Enterprises
Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access
Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access
Score 8.3 out of 10
Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access
Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access
Score 8.3 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Netskope Private AccessSecureLink Enterprise Access
Likelihood to Recommend
9.5
(3 ratings)
8.3
(2 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
8.0
(1 ratings)
8.6
(2 ratings)
Usability
9.0
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
Support Rating
5.0
(1 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
Implementation Rating
8.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Netskope Private AccessSecureLink Enterprise Access
Likelihood to Recommend
Netskope
For more suitable scenarios, it is more flexible to deploy NPA with granular access to third-party vendors and contractors. works well in hybrid and multi-cloud private application access. good use cases with DLP, logging, and zero trust. we required improvement if the customer needs full network layer access, as some of the legacy applications may need full network access. also, can we achieve better performance for latency-sensitive or real-time traffic like voice, video?
Read full review
SecureLink
It does exactly what it needs to. The only times I've had serious issues with rolling out to a vendor is when they have a "contractual agreement" to only use their solution. Almost every vendor that I've worked with and shown this product to has been skeptical for the first 5 minutes and fully converted to liking the ease of use of the product by 10 minutes
Read full review
Pros
Netskope
  • It enables remote users to connect the on premise or cloud hosted application.
  • It overcomes the drawbacks of VPN.
  • It only allows the genuine user to access the application.
Read full review
SecureLink
  • Easy to setup on a client PC or server for access
  • Organizes client connections by gatekeeper so it is easy to find what you need
  • File transfer option is great for uploading files to client servers
Read full review
Cons
Netskope
  • When a blocking alert pops up, the user could click to request it be enabled, making it easier to create the policy.
Read full review
SecureLink
  • Java based. Always an issue. I know they are working on this and it will be Javaless if we need it. I know that Java can cause issues across the board and I understand the need of it, but it does not make it any better when there are Java issues.
  • Stronger integration with the Active Directory. Currently its only read-only, which is good and bad.
  • I would love to see an App. I know they are working on this as well.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Netskope
We are delighted with everything they are adding and how the product is growing.
Read full review
SecureLink
We are happy using securelink to access our client environments
Read full review
Usability
Netskope
As I said before, I find it´s UI very intuitive and it´s very easy to use and configure, everything is where it should be and allows for a good workflow. For the end user it´s only a login page that pops out automatically and close itself once it´s authenticated so it stay out of the way of the user.
Read full review
SecureLink
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Netskope
The support is good, but the problem is that even if you indicate that you prefer support in Spanish, the application indicates that it is available. I have never had a technician who spoke to me in Spanish.
Read full review
SecureLink
The employees at Securelink have always been responsive and seem to be invested in the success of my company. They truly understand what their product means to us so if there is a problem, they are always willing to help. In the rare event that something is found on their end, they will be proactive and reach out to someone to help and get something on calendar for a fix
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Netskope
The process was smooth and well managed.
There was probably good technical coordination and support.
There were only minor details that could be improved.
Read full review
SecureLink
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Netskope
Read full review
SecureLink
Securelink seems to work better than LogMein for a large enterprise group. Our company has over 10,000 different connections and securelink manages them well.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Netskope
  • Re-authentication improves the security.
  • Application access is more stable.
  • Due to frequent publisher upgrade user unable to connect the application.
Read full review
SecureLink
  • I've found that Securelink allows me to get a vendor access to an application for support purposes much faster than a provisioned VPN account and the red tape around this. I can set up a vendor to access an application suite in a half hour and it will be more secure than regular provisioning.
  • The ROI is yet to be seen on this, but it certainly makes Compliance, Internal Audit, and Legal very happy, which helps everybody.
  • Internally, there is much more push back and it has been problematic. For a tech, to have to log in to a server and navigate to a system is considered cumbersome, when before all they had to do was open up Putty or RDP to a server to get in. The only way to combat this is to force them to use Securelink by removing rights. Near impossible for the domain admins.
Read full review
ScreenShots