NGINX vs. NGINX Ingress Controller vs. SUSE Rancher
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
NGINX | Score9.1 out of 10 | Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees) | NGINX, a business unit of F5 Networks, powers over 65% of the world's busiest websites and web applications. NGINX started out as an open source web server and reverse proxy, built to be faster and more efficient than Apache. Over the years, NGINX has built a suite of infrastructure software products o tackle some of the biggest challenges in managing high-transaction applications. NGINX offers a suite of products to form the core of what organizations need to create… | N/A |
NGINX Ingress Controller | Score7.7 out of 10 | N/A | NGINX Ingress Controller is a traffic management solution for cloud‑native apps in Kubernetes and containerized environments. | N/A |
SUSE Rancher | Score9.4 out of 10 | N/A | Developed by Rancher Labs and now from SUSE, Rancher is open-source software that enables organizations to deploy and manage Kubernetes at scale, on any infrastructure across the data center, cloud, branch offices, and the network edge. Rancher centrally manages Kubernetes clusters across the organization in order to ensure security and accelerate transformation. Rancher is also available hosted. Hosted Rancher is a fully managed Rancher control plane - presented as the fastest, most cost… | $7,594.99 per year up to 500 nodes |
| NGINX | NGINX Ingress Controller | SUSE Rancher | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic |
| |||||||||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | Optional | Optional | No setup fee | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| NGINX | NGINX Ingress Controller | SUSE Rancher | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Considered Multiple Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | |||
| Would buy again | |||
98% Would buy again 49 Answers | No answers on this topic | 100% Would buy again 17 Answers | |
| Delivers good value for the price | |||
100% Delivers good value for the price 45 Answers | No answers on this topic | 100% Delivers good value for the price 16 Answers | |
| Happy with the feature set | |||
100% Happy with the feature set 50 Answers | No answers on this topic | 100% Happy with the feature set 17 Answers | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | |||
92% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 34 Answers | No answers on this topic | 100% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 12 Answers | |
| Implementation went as expected | |||
96% Implementation went as expected 43 Answers | No answers on this topic | 100% Implementation went as expected 15 Answers | |
| NGINX | NGINX Ingress Controller | SUSE Rancher | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Application Servers |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Container Management |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| NGINX | NGINX Ingress Controller | SUSE Rancher | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | No answers on this topic | Mirantis Kubernetes Engine Score8 out of 10 | Mirantis Kubernetes Engine Score8 out of 10 |
| Medium-sized Companies | Oracle WebLogic Server Score7.3 out of 10 | Amazon Elastic Container Service (Amazon ECS) Score8.6 out of 10 | Amazon Elastic Container Service (Amazon ECS) Score8.6 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | Red Hat JBoss EAP Score8.5 out of 10 | SUSE Rancher Score9.4 out of 10 | Kubernetes Score9.1 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| NGINX | NGINX Ingress Controller | SUSE Rancher | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 9.3 | 7.9 | 8.8 |
| Likelihood to Renew | 9.0 | - | 10.0 |
| Usability | 8.3 | - | 8.0 |
| Support Rating | 8.0 | - | 6.8 |
| Implementation Rating | 8.0 | - | - |
| Contract Terms and Pricing Model | - | - | 4.5 |
| NGINX | NGINX Ingress Controller | SUSE Rancher | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
|
| Pros |
|
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
|
| Likelihood to Renew |
| No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic |
| Usability |
| No answers on this topic |
|
| Support Rating |
| No answers on this topic |
|
| Alternatives Considered |
|
|
|
| Contract Terms and Pricing Model | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic |
|
| Return on Investment |
|
|
|
| ScreenShots | NGINX Screenshots |












