NGINX vs. Proofpoint Targeted Attack Protection (TAP)
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
NGINX | Score9.1 out of 10 | Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees) | NGINX, a business unit of F5 Networks, powers over 65% of the world's busiest websites and web applications. NGINX started out as an open source web server and reverse proxy, built to be faster and more efficient than Apache. Over the years, NGINX has built a suite of infrastructure software products o tackle some of the biggest challenges in managing high-transaction applications. NGINX offers a suite of products to form the core of what organizations need to create… | N/A |
Proofpoint Targeted Attack Protection (TAP) | Score9.1 out of 10 | N/A | Proofpoint Targeted Attack Protection (TAP) helps organizations efficiently detect, mitigate and respond to known and unknown advanced threats that target people and VIPs through email. TAP provides unparalleled effectiveness in stopping targeted attacks that use polymorphic malware, weaponized documents and credential-stealing phishing techniques to obtain sensitive information. TAP seamlessly integrates with the Proofpoint secure email gateway (Proofpoint Email Protection) to deliver best… | N/A |
| NGINX | Proofpoint Targeted Attack Protection (TAP) | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | Optional | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| NGINX | Proofpoint Targeted Attack Protection (TAP) | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
98% Would buy again 49 Answers | 88% Would buy again 7 Answers | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
100% Delivers good value for the price 45 Answers | 100% Delivers good value for the price 7 Answers | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
100% Happy with the feature set 50 Answers | 100% Happy with the feature set 8 Answers | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
92% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 34 Answers | 83% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 5 Answers | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
96% Implementation went as expected 43 Answers | 100% Implementation went as expected 6 Answers | |
| NGINX | Proofpoint Targeted Attack Protection (TAP) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Application Servers |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
| NGINX | Proofpoint Targeted Attack Protection (TAP) | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic |
| Medium-sized Companies | Oracle WebLogic Server Score7.3 out of 10 | No answers on this topic |
| Enterprises | Red Hat JBoss EAP Score8.5 out of 10 | No answers on this topic |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| NGINX | Proofpoint Targeted Attack Protection (TAP) | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 9.3 | 9.0 |
| Likelihood to Renew | 9.0 | 5.3 |
| Usability | 8.3 | 9.0 |
| Support Rating | 8.0 | 9.0 |
| Implementation Rating | 8.0 | 9.9 |
| NGINX | Proofpoint Targeted Attack Protection (TAP) | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Likelihood to Renew |
|
|
| Usability |
|
|
| Support Rating |
|
|
| Implementation Rating | No answers on this topic |
|
| Alternatives Considered |
|
|
| Return on Investment |
|
|
| ScreenShots | NGINX Screenshots |











