TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

OnRamp vs. Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    OnRamp

    Score8.5 out of 10
    N/AOnRamp is customer onboarding experience software that aims to make white-glove onboarding and implementation possible at any scale. Their customer-led onboarding solution helps B2B businesses deliver better onboarding experiences, keep customers engaged, and ramp up customer value without ramping up resources or project management busywork.

    $7,164

    per year 3 users

    Red Hat JBoss EAP

    Score8.5 out of 10
    N/AN/AN/A
    Pricing
    OnRampRed Hat JBoss EAP
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    OnRampRed Hat JBoss EAP
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Features
    OnRampRed Hat JBoss EAP
    Application Servers
    Comparison of Application Servers features of OnRamp and Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform
    Feature
    OnRamp
    -
    Ratings
    Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform
    6.8
    9 Ratings
    15% below category average
    IDE support00 Ratings6.09 Ratings
    Security management00 Ratings7.09 Ratings
    Administration and management00 Ratings8.09 Ratings
    Application server performance00 Ratings8.09 Ratings
    Installation00 Ratings5.09 Ratings
    Open-source standards compliance00 Ratings7.09 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    OnRampRed Hat JBoss EAP
    Small Businesses
    No answers on this topic
    NGINX
    Score9.1 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    No answers on this topic
    Oracle WebLogic Server
    Score7.3 out of 10
    Enterprises
    No answers on this topic
    NGINX
    Score9.1 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    OnRampRed Hat JBoss EAP
    Likelihood to Recommend
    8.5
    (2 ratings)
    8.1
    (8 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    -
    (0 ratings)
    5.0
    (1 ratings)
    Usability
    8.0
    (2 ratings)
    8.5
    (3 ratings)
    Performance
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.7
    (3 ratings)
    Support Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    5.2
    (2 ratings)
    Ease of integration
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.5
    (3 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    OnRampRed Hat JBoss EAP
    Likelihood to Recommend
    OnRamp Technology, Inc.
    Requesting and collating customer data and submissions is awesome - they see exactly what we need and can work through in their own time. This has been a game changer for us. the timeline is awesome too. it is less appropriate for managing ad hoc tasks internally
    Read full review
    Red Hat
    JBoss EAP is subscription based/open source platform. It's very reliable and great for deploying high transaction Java based enterprise applications. It integrates well with third party components like mod_cluster and supports popular Java EE web-based frameworks such as Spring, Angular JS, jQuery Mobile, and Google Web Toolkit.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    OnRamp Technology, Inc.
    • Accountability of certain tasks
    • breaking down what is needed for each task
    • Being able to submit forms or ask for certain information
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Red Hat
    • MOD_CLUSTER integration. JBoss EAP integrates pretty well with mod_cluster. This is an intelligent load balancer especially useful in highly clustered environments.
    • Supports enterprise-grade features such as high availability clustering, distributed caching, messaging etc.
    • Supports deployment in on-premise, virtual and hybrid cloud environments.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    OnRamp Technology, Inc.
    • Full management overview of all active projects in a Kansan style board would be good
    • Tracking internal ad hoc tasks for projects like customer reported bugs or features, would be great to have follow up targets and better ways to track allocations for these
    • Better way to return to a task overview after editing sub-task builders (at the moment it returns to the list and not the specific task or module)
    Read full review
    Red Hat
    • Difficult to replicate configuration outside of a container environment
    • Still requires quite a bit of knowledge of the CLI
    • Integration with deployment tools requires CLI knowledge
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    OnRamp Technology, Inc.
    No answers on this topic
    Red Hat
    We are planning to migrate away from Jboss to Tomcat as Jboss has shown not interest in supporting OSGi which is heavily used at our shop
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    OnRamp Technology, Inc.
    It is very easy and great to use. I love how customizable it is and I can structure it for specific clients while also keeping a specifc theme
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Red Hat
    JBoss overall is easy to use. The installation and deployment of applications are quick. Documentations and support are also readily available.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Performance
    OnRamp Technology, Inc.
    No answers on this topic
    Red Hat
    JBoss EAP is lightweight and doesn't really consumes much physical resources. It's high performing and suites well for high transaction Java enterprise applications. The out of box performance settings are not really great and you will have to configure the settings to suite your environment to leverage it's full benefits.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    OnRamp Technology, Inc.
    No answers on this topic
    Red Hat
    Fast response.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    OnRamp Technology, Inc.
    All of the others are internal only (or at least the features I have tried), and the key value for us with OnRamp is the customer facing portal. the internal project management and task tracking could be better when compared to other platforms - I probably still have a preference for Wrike or Asana personally for internal items
    Read full review
    Red Hat
    We selected JBoss because of compatibility with EJB's. We currently are trying to reduce our footprint and will highly consider using Tomcat.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    OnRamp Technology, Inc.
    • A great way to keep track of all onboarded clients
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Red Hat
    • Jboss EAP is easy to deploy and configure. This lead to lower cost and faster delivery.
    • Even though we have large number of machines running JBoss, we have only two Jboss Administrators. It doesn't requires too much administration and maintenance on daily basis and reduces number of administrators required for large implementations.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots