TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Red Hat OpenShift

    Score9.1 out of 10
    N/AOpenShift is Red Hat's Cloud Computing Platform as a Service (PaaS) offering. OpenShift is an application platform in the cloud where application developers and teams can build, test, deploy, and run their applications.

    $0.08

    per hour

    Podman

    Score9.6 out of 10
    N/APodman is a daemonless container engine for developing, managing, and running OCI Containers on Linux Systems. Containers can either be run as root or in rootless mode. Podman is open source and free, supported and maintained by the Containers organization, with code available from GitHub.N/A

    SUSE Rancher

    Score9.4 out of 10
    N/ADeveloped by Rancher Labs and now from SUSE, Rancher is open-source software that enables organizations to deploy and manage Kubernetes at scale, on any infrastructure across the data center, cloud, branch offices, and the network edge. Rancher centrally manages Kubernetes clusters across the organization in order to ensure security and accelerate transformation. Rancher is also available hosted. Hosted Rancher is a fully managed Rancher control plane - presented as the fastest, most cost…

    $7,594.99

    per year up to 500 nodes

    Pricing
    Red Hat OpenShiftPodmanSUSE Rancher
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Subscription license
    7,594.99
    per year up to 500 nodes
    Standard Subscription
    11,234.99
    per year 10 nodes
    Priority Subscription
    30,514.99
    per year 10 nodes
    Management Server Priority Subscription
    41,830.99
    per year 1 instance
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Red Hat OpenShiftPodmanSUSE Rancher
    Free Trial
    YesNoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    YesYesYes
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details———
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    Red Hat OpenShiftPodmanSUSE Rancher
    Considered Multiple Products
    Red Hat
    Chose Red Hat OpenShift
    The Tanzu Platform seemed overly complicated, and the frequent changes to the portfolio as well as the messaging made us uneasy. We also decided it would not be wise to tie our application platform to a specific infrastructure provider, as Tanzu cannot be deployed on anything …
    Incentivized
    Chose Red Hat OpenShift
    We've done work on Docker and we've done work in Podman, which aren't really apples to apples as far as OpenShift because they're just purely containerization tools. They're not necessarily platforms. We did an evaluation on a tool, another Kubernetes-based tool, and I don't …
    Incentivized
    Chose Red Hat OpenShift
    We explore a lot of services to use in. But in todays world everything is cloud and the on premise solutions are not very strong until we discover Red Hat OpenShift which still very committed to maintain on premise solutions, we select Openshift and since first day we are very …
    Incentivized
    Chose Red Hat OpenShift
    It's a fairly different experience compared to the other environments due to the additional security
    Incentivized
    Chose Red Hat OpenShift
    OpenShift can host most of them, and most come pre-packed with the OpenShift installation.
    Incentivized
    Chose Red Hat OpenShift
    All in one solution
    Incentivized
    Chose Red Hat OpenShift
    Better support, better UI, and Operators make things easier.
    Incentivized
    Chose Red Hat OpenShift
    We choose Red Hat OpenShift because of the core Open Source values behind Red Hat and the ability for a seasoned company to support the product.
    Incentivized
    Chose Red Hat OpenShift
    Kubernetes is powerful, but managing it yourself takes time. Red Hat OpenShift offers a user-friendly interface, built-in developer tools, and security features, all on top of Kubernetes. It simplifies management and gets you developing faster with all best practices and …
    Incentivized
    Chose Red Hat OpenShift
    K3S supports constrained resource environments but does not have the governance controls needed for our company Rancher RK2 is being actively developed for constrained environments where Red Hat OpenShift is too heavy.
    Incentivized
    Chose Red Hat OpenShift
    Rancher has an easier install, but less responsive controls.
    Incentivized
    Chose Red Hat OpenShift
    OpenShift offers a complete suite of plugins and services already set and configured. Saving time to connect with authentication services, monitoring, logs and CI/CD.
    Incentivized
    Chose Red Hat OpenShift
    Lol Tanzu is a joke
    Incentivized
    Chose Red Hat OpenShift
    We are a Red Hat shop, so it does help to keep the environment consistent and the relationship we have with Red Hat and their support.
    Incentivized
    Chose Red Hat OpenShift
    The biggest reason we chose Red Hat OpenShift is because of our partnership and contract agreement with them. With our needs, were able to get assistance when we need it which is imperative in our area of work.
    Incentivized
    Chose Red Hat OpenShift
    Red Hat OpenShift combines Kubernetes with additional features, streamlining management by avoiding the need to handle separate services.Enterprise. Users appreciate the blend of enterprise-grade support and community collaboration.
    Efficiency wise Some users find that Red …
    Incentivized
    Chose Red Hat OpenShift
    Openshift is less complex as far as implementation and deployment. Also, better support with RedHat.
    Incentivized
    Chose Red Hat OpenShift
    OpenShift is the clear winner. It contains all components necessary to deliver a truly Enterprise ready K8s solution and developer experience.
    Incentivized
    Open Source
    Chose Podman
    Podman is Daemonless, lightweight and doesn’t charge us for commercial usage, so it’s a relief for startups. Minikube and Rancher are a bit more complex for our use cases; so we keep things simple, fast and secure with Podman that can easily be managed with Podman Desktop and …
    Incentivized
    SUSE
    Chose SUSE Rancher
    SUSE Rancher has a great GUI, and seems to be a little bit mor open than the competitors.
    Incentivized
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    97%
    Would buy again
    315 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Would buy again
    17 Answers
    Delivers good value for the price
    96%
    Delivers good value for the price
    268 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Delivers good value for the price
    16 Answers
    Happy with the feature set
    99%
    Happy with the feature set
    322 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Happy with the feature set
    17 Answers
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    97%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    218 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    12 Answers
    Implementation went as expected
    90%
    Implementation went as expected
    255 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Implementation went as expected
    15 Answers
    Features
    Red Hat OpenShiftPodmanSUSE Rancher
    Platform-as-a-Service
    Comparison of Platform-as-a-Service features of Red Hat OpenShift and Podman.io and SUSE Rancher
    Feature
    Red Hat OpenShift
    8.4
    324 Ratings
    8% above category average
    Podman.io
    -
    Ratings
    SUSE Rancher
    -
    Ratings
    Ease of building user interfaces8.6275 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Scalability9.3309 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Platform management overhead8.3290 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Workflow engine capability8.6262 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Platform access control8.3291 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Services-enabled integration8.5273 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Development environment creation8.6283 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Development environment replication8.3270 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Issue monitoring and notification7.9284 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Issue recovery8.1279 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Upgrades and platform fixes8.5285 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Container Management
    Comparison of Container Management features of Red Hat OpenShift and Podman.io and SUSE Rancher
    Feature
    Red Hat OpenShift
    -
    Ratings
    Podman.io
    10.0
    1 Ratings
    20% above category average
    SUSE Rancher
    7.5
    7 Ratings
    9% below category average
    Security and Isolation00 Ratings10.01 Ratings8.06 Ratings
    Container Orchestration00 Ratings00 Ratings8.77 Ratings
    Cluster Management00 Ratings00 Ratings7.47 Ratings
    Storage Management00 Ratings00 Ratings6.76 Ratings
    Resource Allocation and Optimization00 Ratings00 Ratings7.66 Ratings
    Discovery Tools00 Ratings00 Ratings6.56 Ratings
    Update Rollouts and Rollbacks00 Ratings00 Ratings7.17 Ratings
    Self-Healing and Recovery00 Ratings00 Ratings7.86 Ratings
    Analytics, Monitoring, and Logging00 Ratings00 Ratings8.07 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    Red Hat OpenShiftPodmanSUSE Rancher
    Small Businesses
    IBM Cloud Foundry
    Score8.5 out of 10
    Mirantis Kubernetes Engine
    Score8 out of 10
    Mirantis Kubernetes Engine
    Score8 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    IBM Cloud Private
    Score9.6 out of 10
    Amazon Elastic Container Service (Amazon ECS)
    Score8.6 out of 10
    Amazon Elastic Container Service (Amazon ECS)
    Score8.6 out of 10
    Enterprises
    AWS Elastic Beanstalk
    Score8.6 out of 10
    SUSE Rancher
    Score9.4 out of 10
    Kubernetes
    Score9.1 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    Red Hat OpenShiftPodmanSUSE Rancher
    Likelihood to Recommend
    9.1
    (339 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    8.8
    (17 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    9.3
    (26 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    Usability
    8.5
    (10 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.0
    (3 ratings)
    Availability
    5.5
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Performance
    9.0
    (125 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Support Rating
    7.0
    (9 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    6.8
    (2 ratings)
    In-Person Training
    7.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    7.0
    (3 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Contract Terms and Pricing Model
    8.0
    (3 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    4.5
    (1 ratings)
    Professional Services
    7.3
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Vendor post-sale
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Vendor pre-sale
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Red Hat OpenShiftPodmanSUSE Rancher
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Red Hat
    Red Hat OpenShift, despite its complexity and overhead, remains the most complete and enterprise-ready Kubernetes platform available. It excels in research projects like ours, where we need robust CI/CD, GPU scheduling, and tight integration with tools like Jupyter, OpenDataHub, and Quiskit. Its security, scalability, and operator ecosystem make it ideal for experimental and production-grade AI workloads. However, for simpler general hosting tasks—such as serving static websites or lightweight backend services—we find traditional VMs, Docker, or LXD more practical and resource-efficient. Red Hat OpenShift shines in complex, container-native workflows, but can be overkill for basic infrastructure needs.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Open Source
    While it always depends on your use case, I believe security concerns of need for root user is a concern, so it is worth considering daemonless container service over Docker, which works just as good and has support for docker compose. Another good reason is the licensing for enterprise usage, which podman has no restrictions for. It’s also a great choice for OpenShift integration, which is seamless and works well with Rancher as well.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    SUSE
    SUSE Rancher as a management tool becomes useful on a larger scale. Small deployments not so much. If someone also requires Kubernetes capacity or storage, Rancher is an excellent choice. Also, without Kubernetes' skills, it is unlikely that Rancher deployment is going to be a success. Then again if someone else is managing your Kubernetes capacity, setting up the software's capacity will yield greater control. Rancher is not a very integrated solution similar to others in the market.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Red Hat
    • We had a few microservices that dealt with notifications and alerts. We used OpenShift to deploy these microservices, which handle and deliver notifications using publish-subscribe models.
    • We had to expose an API to consumers via MTLS, which was implemented using Server secret integration in OpenShift. We were then able to deploy the APIs on OpenShift with API security.
    • We integrated Splunk with OpenShift to view the logs of our applications and gain real-time insights into usage, as well as provide high availability.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Open Source
    • It’s daemonless, so somewhat more secure.
    • It works exceptionally well and is compatible with Docker compose
    • Podman Desktop actually makes individual usage also pretty easy.
    • It can be used as Docker alternative with almost no additional steps
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    SUSE
    • Public and private cloud infrastructure providers based on K8s CAPI
    • REST API that can be used to integrate company services with Rancher
    • GUI that is easy to learn and use in daily operations
    • Builtin GitOps automation solution based on Fleet project
    • It is fully open source
    Read full review
    Cons
    Red Hat
    • I wouldn't necessarily say there is look everyday technology transform. I can see a trend wherein Red Hat OpenShift is adopting all the new technology trends and helping their customers align with their priorities and the emerging technology trends. I wouldn't call out various scope for development every day. There is scope for development. It is all how the organizations adopt it and how they deliver it to their customers. I don't want to call out there is scope for development. It's happening. It is a never ending process.
    • At the moment, I don't have anything to call out. We are experiencing Red Hat OpenShift and we can see every day they're coming up with new features as and when they come up with new features, we want to experience it more and more. We are looking for opportunities wherein this can be leveraged to help our users and partners.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Open Source
    • Podman desktop is getting more stable with each version, but does need more UX friendliness as well.
    • Official support for development tools and IDEs is missing for most tools
    • It works well with Kubernetes, but I wouldn’t mind additional improvements
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    SUSE
    • No possibility to snapshot Projects. You can snapshot and restore the whole Kubernetes cluster, but not a Project or Namespace. For this, you have to use external tools.
    • You cannot detach the Rancher-created Kubernetes clusters from Rancher management.
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    Red Hat
    This is the current strategy for the company, most of the products in the organisation are aligning to Openshift and various use cases it support. Also lot of applications are being developed for AI use case, openshift.AI provides opportunity to host and leverage the AI capabilities for these applications
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Open Source
    No answers on this topic
    SUSE
    No answers on this topic
    Usability
    Red Hat
    As I said before, the obserability is one of the weakest point of OpenShift and that has a lot to do with usability. The Kibana console is not fully integrated with OpenShift console and you have to switch from tab to tab to use it. Same with Prometheus, Jaeger and Grafan, it's a "simple" integration but if you want to do complex queries or dashboards you have to go to the specific console
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Open Source
    No answers on this topic
    SUSE
    Overall it deserves an 8 out of 10. The platform is very easy to use as long as the UI is stable. We have had a few buggy versions in the past. However the CLI is excellent and the platform is simple to manage and maintain. It is easy to deploy and offer for company wide use which increases utilization and ROI.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Reliability and Availability
    Red Hat
    Redhat openshift is generally reliable and available platform, it ensures high availability for most the situations. in fact the product where we put openshift in a box, we ensure that the availability is also happening at node and network level and also at storage level, so some of the factors that are outside of Openshift realm are also working in HA manner.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Open Source
    No answers on this topic
    SUSE
    No answers on this topic
    Performance
    Red Hat
    Overall, this platform is beneficial. The only downsides we have encountered have been with pods that occasionally hang. This results in resources being dedicated to dead or zombie pods. Over time, these wasted resources occasionally cause us issues, and we have had difficulty monitoring these pods. However, this issue does not overshadow the benefits we get from Openshift.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Open Source
    No answers on this topic
    SUSE
    No answers on this topic
    Support Rating
    Red Hat
    Their customer support team is good and quick to respond. On a couple of occassions, they have helped us in solving some issues which we were finding a tad difficult to comprehend. On a rare occasion, the response was a bit slow but maybe it was because of the festival season. Overall a good experience on this front.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Open Source
    No answers on this topic
    SUSE
    The documentation is quite complete and there is a very active community that is willing to collaborate and answer questions for those who are just starting out.
    Read full review
    In-Person Training
    Red Hat
    I was not involved in the in person training, so i
    can not answer this question, but the team in my org worked directly
    with Openshift and able to get the in person training done easily, i did not
    hear problem or complain in this space, so i hope things happen
    seamlessly without any issue.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Open Source
    No answers on this topic
    SUSE
    No answers on this topic
    Online Training
    Red Hat
    We went thru the training material on RH webesite, i think its very descriptive and the handson lab sesssions are very useful. It would be good to create more short duration videos covering one single aspect of openshift, this wll keep the interest and also it breaks down the complexity to reasonable chunks.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Open Source
    No answers on this topic
    SUSE
    No answers on this topic
    Alternatives Considered
    Red Hat
    The Tanzu Platform seemed overly complicated, and the frequent changes to the portfolio as well as the messaging made us uneasy. We also decided it would not be wise to tie our application platform to a specific infrastructure provider, as Tanzu cannot be deployed on anything other than vSphere. SUSE Rancher seemed good overall, but ultimately felt closer to a DIY approach versus the comprehensive package that Red Hat OpenShift provides.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Open Source
    Podman is Daemonless, lightweight and doesn’t charge us for commercial usage, so it’s a relief for startups. Minikube and Rancher are a bit more complex for our use cases; so we keep things simple, fast and secure with Podman that can easily be managed with Podman Desktop and other works with our docker-compose based projects without issues.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    SUSE
    We started using SUSE Rancher in the early days and spent a large amount of time getting to know and love it. This was before the days of some of the likes of Amazon Web Services who may now provide a cheaper but less feature-rich alternative to SUSE Rancher, however we have yet to explore this.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Contract Terms and Pricing Model
    Red Hat
    It's easy to understand what are being billed and what's included in each type of subscription. Same with the support (Std or Premium) you know exactly what to expect when you need to use it. The "core" unit approach on the subscription made really simple to scale and carry the workloads from one site to another.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Open Source
    No answers on this topic
    SUSE
    The investment for small environments is quite significant. There has to be a compelling case to enhance the areas where SUSE Rancher brings in value to make such a financial leap. There is also a free version to test the value propositions, which will help support the user's buying decisions. More clusters, more volume, more tasks and more complexity in the environment equals more value that Rancher can provide.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Scalability
    Red Hat
    This is a great platform to deployment container applications designed for multiple use cases. Its reasonably scalable platform, that can host multiple instances of applications, which can seamlessly handle the node and pod failure, if they are configured properly. There should be some scalability best practices guide would be very useful
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Open Source
    No answers on this topic
    SUSE
    No answers on this topic
    Return on Investment
    Red Hat
    • That is a complicated question and one that's not easy for me to answer. There's a lot of factors that go into all of the stuff that we just don't have an easy way of measuring. And we realize that while we're implementing Red Hat OpenShift, we've tried to start measuring some of that stuff, but we don't have a baseline to go on. So it's hard to say. What I can tell you is general experience with the platform has been extremely positive from the development aspect. Teams have been very, very happy with the speed at which they're able to do stuff. They've been happy with that. The way it works in one environment is exactly the way it works in the next environment because we don't have configuration drift, that type of thing, and has had very positive impacts. But we didn't have a baseline to start with. So I can't talk about getting there faster or anything like that.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Open Source
    • We definitely feel more secure.
    • We do not suffer from memory or cpu overuses as it uses fedora coreOS which is lightweight
    • We do not have to worry about license payments for our basic usages.
    • It’s open source so quick fixes imminent with maximum transparency.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    SUSE
    • Shortens "Time-to-Market" factor for new business applications or implementing new functionalities. From 1 to 50 microservices-based business applications in 6 years.
    • 24/7 availability, generates more money. There are many infrastructure components that are regularly powered-off for maintenance or upgrade, bur we rarely are turning off our downstream Kubernetes clusters where our business applications lives.
    • Single Point of Contact with platform maintenance and development Team, eases implementation of new business applications
    Read full review
    ScreenShots