TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Red Hat OpenShift vs. Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Red Hat OpenShift

    Score9.1 out of 10
    N/AOpenShift is Red Hat's Cloud Computing Platform as a Service (PaaS) offering. OpenShift is an application platform in the cloud where application developers and teams can build, test, deploy, and run their applications.

    $0.08

    per hour

    Ansible

    Score9.1 out of 10
    N/AThe Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform (acquired by Red Hat in 2015) is a foundation for building and operating automation across an organization. The platform includes tools needed to implement enterprise-wide automation, and can automate resource provisioning, and IT environments and configuration of systems and devices. It can be used in a CI/CD process to provision the target environment and to then deploy the application on it.

    $5,000

    per year

    Pricing
    Red Hat OpenShiftAnsible
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    Basic Tower
    5,000
    per year
    Enterprise Tower
    10,000
    per year
    Premium Tower
    14,000
    per year
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Red Hat OpenShiftAnsible
    Free Trial
    YesNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    YesNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    Red Hat OpenShiftAnsible
    Considered Both Products
    Red Hat
    Chose Red Hat OpenShift
    OpenShift integrates the other products in the Red Hat suite easily.
    Incentivized
    Chose Red Hat OpenShift
    Ocp integrates good with AAP as an operator

    We also used ACS and ACM
    Incentivized
    Chose Red Hat OpenShift
    We looked at a few other options like plain Kubernetes and some managed services, but Red Hat OpenShift stood out because it’s enterprise-ready out of the box. The built-in security, automation tools, and support made a big difference.
    Incentivized
    Chose Red Hat OpenShift
    Comparing the 2, open source Kubernetes is quicker to setup by about 75%, less restrictive, and free of course, but it lacks the security and support of Red Hat, and deploying features is much harder compared to with operators. For buisiness purposes, OpenShift is just more …
    Incentivized
    Chose Red Hat OpenShift
    Even though Red Hat OpenShift has more overhead than many other Kubernetes flavors, we have selected Red Hat OpenShift because of it's focus on Security and because of it's excellent vendor support.
    Incentivized
    Chose Red Hat OpenShift
    At agency there is no other competitor that can accomplish what we've been able to put together with a partnership with Red Hat.
    Incentivized
    Chose Red Hat OpenShift
    ease of use
    Incentivized
    Chose Red Hat OpenShift
    The Tanzu Platform seemed overly complicated, and the frequent changes to the portfolio as well as the messaging made us uneasy. We also decided it would not be wise to tie our application platform to a specific infrastructure provider, as Tanzu cannot be deployed on anything …
    Incentivized
    Chose Red Hat OpenShift
    They are great addition to the Red Hat OpenShift itself
    Incentivized
    Chose Red Hat OpenShift
    Tanzu is great as well, but I find Red Hat OpenShift more cost friendly and more Opensource apps available.
    Incentivized
    Chose Red Hat OpenShift
    we just got into Red Hat OpenShift and never got back
    Incentivized
    Chose Red Hat OpenShift
    OpenShift is much better platform. When you decide to do an OpenShift upgrade it is very easy you just click the button and everything is automated. Compare to Rancher where most of the work is done by hand.
    Incentivized
    Chose Red Hat OpenShift
    Red Hat runs in multiple cloud and on-premise environments, so offers a portable experience in different contexts.
    Incentivized
    Chose Red Hat OpenShift
    AAP is one of the great deployment tool , it is the most efficient way to deploy apps by creating a quick self manage playbooks.
    Incentivized
    Chose Red Hat OpenShift
    There is no differential choice, the two products fulfill very different functions within the Company, since one is a platform as a service and the other is an infrastructure as a service, and it is a consumption at the choice of the clients.

    no existe una eleccion diferencial, …
    Incentivized
    Chose Red Hat OpenShift
    They are all nice products, and they all have their place. But I'm convinced that from now on, instead of instantly just creating a Kubernetes cluster, I'm going to start seeing if Red Hat OpenShift is the best answer based on the project's overall needs. It's truly made that …
    Incentivized
    Red Hat
    Chose Ansible
    We selected Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform because the Redhat support
    Incentivized
    Chose Ansible
    Ansible is stackable with other automation tools. We are using this with Cisco NSO on SSH.
    Incentivized
    Chose Ansible
    It was the only automation platform that we evaluated.
    Incentivized
    Chose Ansible
    As I said earlier, Red Hat Ansible remains a top choice because it is a perfect combination of multiple capabilities. Terraform is good in IAC but not in config automation. Puppet is well-suited for developers, but not for system administrators and infrastructure integrators. …
    Incentivized
    Chose Ansible
    Similar platform - stable
    Incentivized
    Chose Ansible
    Our organization chose Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform because, in our experience, Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform is the best
    Incentivized
    Chose Ansible
    We chose Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform because, in our experience, Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform helps in daily tasks
    Incentivized
    Chose Ansible
    Perfectly
    Incentivized
    Chose Ansible
    One of these is already included in our license and the other is not. The agent based model makes access management to servers simpler. The agentless model makes things more flexible and secure for large organizations
    Incentivized
    Chose Ansible
    Comp
    Incentivized
    Chose Ansible
    Ansible is better for configuration management, and Terraform is better for provisioning.
    Incentivized
    Chose Ansible
    Less Complexity and push model
    Incentivized
    Chose Ansible
    It's agentless. Not needing to deploy and maintain an agent on a system I want to maintain is invaluable.
    Incentivized
    Chose Ansible
    For the most part pretty well. Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform will always have room for improvement for a while since it really is a bit of a moving target and will always strive for new capabilities. RHEL of course has been around for some time and it does what it is …
    Incentivized
    Chose Ansible
    Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform is a reliable, feature-rich, and easy to develop platform.
    Incentivized
    Chose Ansible
    We were Puppet users. Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform made more sense to us because of the focus on Ansible content to support our AIX systems and RHEL systems. We have also seen that the learning curve for Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform is better than we experienced …
    Incentivized
    Chose Ansible
    AAP is a building block in majority of build/deployment and configuration processes that involve the traditional compute (ie. bare metal and VM based) systems running RHEL, as well as the modern platforms to run containerized workloads, such as OpenShift. We use AAP to automate …
    Incentivized
    Chose Ansible
    It's the only one.
    Incentivized
    Chose Ansible
    AAP helps to manage thousand of servers at the same time.
    Incentivized
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    97%
    Would buy again
    315 Answers
    99%
    Would buy again
    265 Answers
    Delivers good value for the price
    96%
    Delivers good value for the price
    268 Answers
    96%
    Delivers good value for the price
    210 Answers
    Happy with the feature set
    99%
    Happy with the feature set
    322 Answers
    98%
    Happy with the feature set
    263 Answers
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    97%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    218 Answers
    97%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    166 Answers
    Implementation went as expected
    90%
    Implementation went as expected
    255 Answers
    89%
    Implementation went as expected
    201 Answers
    Features
    Red Hat OpenShiftAnsible
    Platform-as-a-Service
    Comparison of Platform-as-a-Service features of Red Hat OpenShift and Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform
    Feature
    Red Hat OpenShift
    8.4
    324 Ratings
    8% above category average
    Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform
    -
    Ratings
    Ease of building user interfaces8.6275 Ratings00 Ratings
    Scalability9.3309 Ratings00 Ratings
    Platform management overhead8.3290 Ratings00 Ratings
    Workflow engine capability8.6262 Ratings00 Ratings
    Platform access control8.3291 Ratings00 Ratings
    Services-enabled integration8.5273 Ratings00 Ratings
    Development environment creation8.6283 Ratings00 Ratings
    Development environment replication8.3270 Ratings00 Ratings
    Issue monitoring and notification7.9284 Ratings00 Ratings
    Issue recovery8.1279 Ratings00 Ratings
    Upgrades and platform fixes8.5285 Ratings00 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    Red Hat OpenShiftAnsible
    Small Businesses
    IBM Cloud Foundry
    Score8.5 out of 10
    Salt
    Score6.2 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    IBM Cloud Private
    Score9.6 out of 10
    Perforce Puppet
    Score8.5 out of 10
    Enterprises
    AWS Elastic Beanstalk
    Score8.6 out of 10
    Salt
    Score6.2 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    Red Hat OpenShiftAnsible
    Likelihood to Recommend
    9.1
    (339 ratings)
    8.8
    (292 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    9.3
    (26 ratings)
    9.2
    (8 ratings)
    Usability
    8.5
    (10 ratings)
    8.3
    (184 ratings)
    Availability
    5.5
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Performance
    9.0
    (125 ratings)
    8.7
    (5 ratings)
    Support Rating
    7.0
    (9 ratings)
    8.0
    (5 ratings)
    In-Person Training
    7.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    7.0
    (3 ratings)
    8.0
    (2 ratings)
    Contract Terms and Pricing Model
    8.0
    (3 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Ease of integration
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.6
    (5 ratings)
    Professional Services
    7.3
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Vendor post-sale
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Vendor pre-sale
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Red Hat OpenShiftAnsible
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Red Hat
    Red Hat OpenShift, despite its complexity and overhead, remains the most complete and enterprise-ready Kubernetes platform available. It excels in research projects like ours, where we need robust CI/CD, GPU scheduling, and tight integration with tools like Jupyter, OpenDataHub, and Quiskit. Its security, scalability, and operator ecosystem make it ideal for experimental and production-grade AI workloads. However, for simpler general hosting tasks—such as serving static websites or lightweight backend services—we find traditional VMs, Docker, or LXD more practical and resource-efficient. Red Hat OpenShift shines in complex, container-native workflows, but can be overkill for basic infrastructure needs.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Red Hat
    I think it's the best defacto orchestrator for automation because it's so easy to integrate in other tools to it (dynatrace, cyberark, terraform, etc). It is a lot for a new or smaller team to use so I wouldn't recommend it to a new team using Ansible, in that case using Ansible navigator is a better start to understanding playbooks/inventories before diving into the complexity of Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform. EDA also takes a lot of connectivity between Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform and target systems to get working which can be difficult in very locked down envs unless you have approval from many other teams like networking and security.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Red Hat
    • We had a few microservices that dealt with notifications and alerts. We used OpenShift to deploy these microservices, which handle and deliver notifications using publish-subscribe models.
    • We had to expose an API to consumers via MTLS, which was implemented using Server secret integration in OpenShift. We were then able to deploy the APIs on OpenShift with API security.
    • We integrated Splunk with OpenShift to view the logs of our applications and gain real-time insights into usage, as well as provide high availability.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Red Hat
    • Standardize controls and visibility for automation.
    • Provide RBAC and Vault for improved automation security and support.
    • Job Scheduling is much more effective than Cron or other home-grown solutions.
    • The Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform API is one of the best features as it makes automation accessible from any other platform.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Red Hat
    • I wouldn't necessarily say there is look everyday technology transform. I can see a trend wherein Red Hat OpenShift is adopting all the new technology trends and helping their customers align with their priorities and the emerging technology trends. I wouldn't call out various scope for development every day. There is scope for development. It is all how the organizations adopt it and how they deliver it to their customers. I don't want to call out there is scope for development. It's happening. It is a never ending process.
    • At the moment, I don't have anything to call out. We are experiencing Red Hat OpenShift and we can see every day they're coming up with new features as and when they come up with new features, we want to experience it more and more. We are looking for opportunities wherein this can be leveraged to help our users and partners.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Red Hat
    • Ansible is still not truly declarative like Terraform.
    • Simple automation is fine, but creating complex, scalable automation scripts is very difficult to learn.
    • For a higher number of nodes, Ansible consumes a lot of resources. It needs the paid version of AAP, which requires a cost.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    Red Hat
    This is the current strategy for the company, most of the products in the organisation are aligning to Openshift and various use cases it support. Also lot of applications are being developed for AI use case, openshift.AI provides opportunity to host and leverage the AI capabilities for these applications
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Red Hat
    We are extremely happy with the use of AAP. It's better than expected, There is almost no limit when thinking of automation. The only problem is that the day to day is consuming a big part of our time. Patching and checking vulnerabilities are virtually killing us. But we can only improve with AAP.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    Red Hat
    As I said before, the obserability is one of the weakest point of OpenShift and that has a lot to do with usability. The Kibana console is not fully integrated with OpenShift console and you have to switch from tab to tab to use it. Same with Prometheus, Jaeger and Grafan, it's a "simple" integration but if you want to do complex queries or dashboards you have to go to the specific console
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Red Hat
    Everything has room for improvement, but Ansible is the best tool out there for what it does and what it can do. There are plenty of features and capabilities that can be added, but it's just a matter of time before it happens.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Reliability and Availability
    Red Hat
    Redhat openshift is generally reliable and available platform, it ensures high availability for most the situations. in fact the product where we put openshift in a box, we ensure that the availability is also happening at node and network level and also at storage level, so some of the factors that are outside of Openshift realm are also working in HA manner.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Red Hat
    No answers on this topic
    Performance
    Red Hat
    Overall, this platform is beneficial. The only downsides we have encountered have been with pods that occasionally hang. This results in resources being dedicated to dead or zombie pods. Over time, these wasted resources occasionally cause us issues, and we have had difficulty monitoring these pods. However, this issue does not overshadow the benefits we get from Openshift.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Red Hat
    Great in almost every way compared to any other configuration management software. The only thing I wish for is python3 support. Other than that, YAML is much improved compared to the Ruby of Chef. The agentless nature is incredibly convenient for managing systems quickly, and if a member of your term has no terminal experience whatsoever they can still use the UI.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    Red Hat
    Their customer support team is good and quick to respond. On a couple of occassions, they have helped us in solving some issues which we were finding a tad difficult to comprehend. On a rare occasion, the response was a bit slow but maybe it was because of the festival season. Overall a good experience on this front.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Red Hat
    There is a lot of good documentation that Ansible and Red Hat provide which should help get someone started with making Ansible useful. But once you get to more complicated scenarios, you will benefit from learning from others. I have not used Red Hat support for work with Ansible, but many of the online resources are helpful.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    In-Person Training
    Red Hat
    I was not involved in the in person training, so i
    can not answer this question, but the team in my org worked directly
    with Openshift and able to get the in person training done easily, i did not
    hear problem or complain in this space, so i hope things happen
    seamlessly without any issue.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Red Hat
    No answers on this topic
    Online Training
    Red Hat
    We went thru the training material on RH webesite, i think its very descriptive and the handson lab sesssions are very useful. It would be good to create more short duration videos covering one single aspect of openshift, this wll keep the interest and also it breaks down the complexity to reasonable chunks.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Red Hat
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation Rating
    Red Hat
    No answers on this topic
    Red Hat
    I spoke on this topic today!
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Red Hat
    The Tanzu Platform seemed overly complicated, and the frequent changes to the portfolio as well as the messaging made us uneasy. We also decided it would not be wise to tie our application platform to a specific infrastructure provider, as Tanzu cannot be deployed on anything other than vSphere. SUSE Rancher seemed good overall, but ultimately felt closer to a DIY approach versus the comprehensive package that Red Hat OpenShift provides.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Red Hat
    AAP compares favorably with Terraform and Power Automate. I don't have much experience with Terraform, but I find AAP and Ansible easier to use as well as having more capabilities. Power Platform is also an excellent automation tool that is user friendly but I feel that Ansible has more compatibility with a variety of technologies.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Contract Terms and Pricing Model
    Red Hat
    It's easy to understand what are being billed and what's included in each type of subscription. Same with the support (Std or Premium) you know exactly what to expect when you need to use it. The "core" unit approach on the subscription made really simple to scale and carry the workloads from one site to another.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Red Hat
    No answers on this topic
    Scalability
    Red Hat
    This is a great platform to deployment container applications designed for multiple use cases. Its reasonably scalable platform, that can host multiple instances of applications, which can seamlessly handle the node and pod failure, if they are configured properly. There should be some scalability best practices guide would be very useful
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Red Hat
    No answers on this topic
    Return on Investment
    Red Hat
    • That is a complicated question and one that's not easy for me to answer. There's a lot of factors that go into all of the stuff that we just don't have an easy way of measuring. And we realize that while we're implementing Red Hat OpenShift, we've tried to start measuring some of that stuff, but we don't have a baseline to go on. So it's hard to say. What I can tell you is general experience with the platform has been extremely positive from the development aspect. Teams have been very, very happy with the speed at which they're able to do stuff. They've been happy with that. The way it works in one environment is exactly the way it works in the next environment because we don't have configuration drift, that type of thing, and has had very positive impacts. But we didn't have a baseline to start with. So I can't talk about getting there faster or anything like that.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Red Hat
    • First, it keeps our entire server infrastructure aligned with our standards and reduces the time and effort needed to maintain our systems.
    • Automate routine IT tasks to save time, reduce errors, and ensure every server is configured and updated consistently.
    • Tasks that used to take our teams weeks to complete manually now run automatically and reliably, with full visibility, making our infrastructure management more effective and our compliance tracking much easier.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots