TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

OpenText Application Quality Management vs. Parcel.js vs. Plastic, now part of Unity DevOps

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    OpenText Application Quality Management

    Score4 out of 10
    N/AReplacing the former AccuRev, OpenText™ Application Quality Management is a solution to govern application lifecycle management activities and implement rigorous, auditable lifecycle processes, offering a single pane of glass for software quality management.N/A

    Parcel.js

    Score9 out of 10
    N/AParcel, or Parcel.js, is a zero configuration web application bundler. Parcel supports many languages and file types out of the box, from web technologies like HTML, CSS, and JavaScript, to assets like images, fonts, and videos. When a file type isn't included by default, Parcel will automatically install all of the necessary plugins and dev dependencies for the user.N/A

    Plastic, now part of Unity DevOps

    Score8.2 out of 10
    Enterprise companies (1,001+ employees)
    Plastic was a version control system for facilitating branching, diffing and merging. It was acquired by Unity, and its features are part of Unity DevOps. The application is no longer available for sale.

    $6.95

    per user

    Pricing
    OpenText Application Quality ManagementParcel.jsPlastic, now part of Unity DevOps
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Cloud Edition
    $6.95
    per user
    Team Edition (on prem)
    $9.95
    per user
    Enterprise Edition
    $23.25
    per user
    Enterprise Edition (perpetual)
    $595.00
    per user
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    OpenText Application Quality ManagementParcel.jsPlastic, now part of Unity DevOps
    Free Trial
    NoNoYes
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNoYes
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeOptionalNo setup feeOptional
    Additional Details* Educational institutions receive a substantial discount on Plastic SCM licensing fees * Corporate/volume pricing is available * For more information, please contact sales at sales@codicesoftware.com
    More Pricing Information
    Best Alternatives
    OpenText Application Quality ManagementParcel.jsPlastic, now part of Unity DevOps
    Small Businesses
    Polarion ALM
    Score10 out of 10
    Apache Maven
    Score9.1 out of 10
    GitHub
    Score9.2 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    PTC Windchill RV&S
    Score2 out of 10
    Apache Maven
    Score9.1 out of 10
    Git
    Score10 out of 10
    Enterprises
    Polarion ALM
    Score10 out of 10
    Gradle Build Tool (Open Source)
    Score9 out of 10
    Perforce P4
    Score7.5 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    OpenText Application Quality ManagementParcel.jsPlastic, now part of Unity DevOps
    Likelihood to Recommend
    1.0
    (4 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.4
    (3 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    6.1
    (3 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Availability
    7.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    OpenText Application Quality ManagementParcel.jsPlastic, now part of Unity DevOps
    Likelihood to Recommend
    OpenText
    Very slow and not intuitive; it would be my last choice for version control systems.The UI is a little confusing at times and seems a little outdated. It needs a lot of improvement. It is suited for small projects and fewer number of projects. But if there are huge projects and many projects to be maintained in a portfolio, its a little hard to manage.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Open Source
    No answers on this topic
    Discontinued Products
    Plastic SCM is well suited for the distributed development environment, where branching and merging can easily be handled. Its a good tool for version controlling, especially for a big team which is contributing to a big project simultaneously. Situation where Plastic SCM is not at all well suited are : If the project is smaller one and need to be handled by couple of people. So in that case setting up Plastic SCM and educating people to work on it is not at all efficient
    Read full review
    Pros
    OpenText
    • One place for most recent code with history, avoid any conflict/confusion among other team/members.
    • Stream/Workflow approach to control approval process betwen all the teams, which I couldn't find in other version control tools I worked.
    • Bundle our code in a small group (called, Issues in Accurev) to differentiate between different projects.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Open Source
    No answers on this topic
    Discontinued Products
    • Version Control
    • Organizing Workflow
    • Transparency
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    OpenText
    • Ability to zoom in/out for stream-view. We currently have many streams/substreams and unable to view the entire workflow. Zooming in/out would benefit.
    • Being a designer, I use Adobe Flash and SWF files. When updating the SWF files, Accurev does not see these files as being changed and you will be unable to promote. In order to push changes, you must totally rename the SWF file.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Open Source
    No answers on this topic
    Discontinued Products
    • Interface
    • Documentation
    • Learning curve
    • Unity integration
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    OpenText
    We will renew because it is part of our build process.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Open Source
    No answers on this topic
    Discontinued Products
    No answers on this topic
    Alternatives Considered
    OpenText
    In my view, accurev ranks very low compared to other tools I have used. Microsoft TFS is the best in the industry as of today as it's a complete ALM solution. It does code version, bug tracking, user story documentation, and has easy integration with other external tools supporting many languages. So I would definitely recommend TFS to anyone.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Open Source
    No answers on this topic
    Discontinued Products
    Plastic has best integration with unity - zero issues, native, straightforward. GitHub feels more stable but for smaller and or indie teams plastic s version control feels much more under control - you click, you feel safe. moreover, there is no need for extra tools such as gitkraken, gitlab, Sourcetree, fork, etc. it is really easy to develop games this way.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    OpenText
    • Better team coordination.
    • Avoid confusion by having one place for all documentation and code.
    • Better project management by having different work streams.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Open Source
    No answers on this topic
    Discontinued Products
    • Easy to use
    • Cheap
    • Better than git for us
    • Artists love it
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots

    Plastic, now part of Unity DevOps Screenshots

    Product screenshotProduct screenshotProduct screenshotProduct screenshotProduct screenshotProduct screenshot