TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

OpenText Application Quality Management vs. QEdge

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    OpenText Application Quality Management

    Score4 out of 10
    N/AReplacing the former AccuRev, OpenText™ Application Quality Management is a solution to govern application lifecycle management activities and implement rigorous, auditable lifecycle processes, offering a single pane of glass for software quality management.N/A

    QEdge

    Score7.6 out of 10
    N/AN/A

    $79

    per year

    Pricing
    OpenText Application Quality ManagementQEdge
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    Basic
    $79
    per year
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    OpenText Application Quality ManagementQEdge
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeOptionalNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Best Alternatives
    OpenText Application Quality ManagementQEdge
    Small Businesses
    Polarion ALM
    Score10 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    Medium-sized Companies
    PTC Windchill RV&S
    Score2 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    Enterprises
    IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management
    Score5 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    OpenText Application Quality ManagementQEdge
    Likelihood to Recommend
    1.0
    (4 ratings)
    6.5
    (2 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    6.1
    (3 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Usability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.0
    (2 ratings)
    Availability
    7.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    OpenText Application Quality ManagementQEdge
    Likelihood to Recommend
    OpenText
    Very slow and not intuitive; it would be my last choice for version control systems.The UI is a little confusing at times and seems a little outdated. It needs a lot of improvement. It is suited for small projects and fewer number of projects. But if there are huge projects and many projects to be maintained in a portfolio, its a little hard to manage.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Sarjen Systems
    QEdge all software are well suited for organisation where regulatory acceptation are more as compared to other non regulated industry. Its is best for organisation where work flow is scattered and need to convert in to organised work flow. It is less suited for organisation with smaller number of employee with limited budget.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    OpenText
    • One place for most recent code with history, avoid any conflict/confusion among other team/members.
    • Stream/Workflow approach to control approval process betwen all the teams, which I couldn't find in other version control tools I worked.
    • Bundle our code in a small group (called, Issues in Accurev) to differentiate between different projects.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Sarjen Systems
    • QEdge all software are compliant to pharmaceutical regulatory standard.
    • It is customisation as per our requirements.
    • There integration with each other reduce duplication of work.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    OpenText
    • Ability to zoom in/out for stream-view. We currently have many streams/substreams and unable to view the entire workflow. Zooming in/out would benefit.
    • Being a designer, I use Adobe Flash and SWF files. When updating the SWF files, Accurev does not see these files as being changed and you will be unable to promote. In order to push changes, you must totally rename the SWF file.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Sarjen Systems
    • Dashboard functionality need to implement for QMS tracking.
    • Change control report generation is not customisation as per requirement.
    • System assign same number for different QMS like CAPA.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    OpenText
    We will renew because it is part of our build process.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Sarjen Systems
    No answers on this topic
    Usability
    OpenText
    No answers on this topic
    Sarjen Systems
    The QEdge rating reflects both its strengths and shortcomings. Its compliance tools, automation features, and scalability shine, ensuring efficiency and consistency. Its service and support from vendor also appreciable. However, due to some scope of improvement in software which could easy our task during routine work. I have given 8 rating out of 10.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    OpenText
    In my view, accurev ranks very low compared to other tools I have used. Microsoft TFS is the best in the industry as of today as it's a complete ALM solution. It does code version, bug tracking, user story documentation, and has easy integration with other external tools supporting many languages. So I would definitely recommend TFS to anyone.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Sarjen Systems
    No answers on this topic
    Return on Investment
    OpenText
    • Better team coordination.
    • Avoid confusion by having one place for all documentation and code.
    • Better project management by having different work streams.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Sarjen Systems
    • Its increased productivity and expedite document approval process.
    • Improved organisation alignment with regulatory authorities
    • Document tracking and traceability become easier
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots