Fortify by OpenText vs. Upsource

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Fortify by OpenText
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
An AppSec solution formerly from Micro Focus, spanning SCA, SAST and DAST that supports the breadth and management of any application portfolio, used to secure code. Features API discovery and testing for any application, throughout the software lifecycle.N/A
Upsource
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
N/AN/A
Pricing
Fortify by OpenTextUpsource
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Fortify by OpenTextUpsource
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Fortify by OpenTextUpsource
Best Alternatives
Fortify by OpenTextUpsource
Small Businesses
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.8 out of 10
GitHub
GitHub
Score 9.1 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Veracode
Veracode
Score 8.8 out of 10
Veracode
Veracode
Score 8.8 out of 10
Enterprises
Veracode
Veracode
Score 8.8 out of 10
Perforce P4
Perforce P4
Score 7.2 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Fortify by OpenTextUpsource
Likelihood to Recommend
9.0
(6 ratings)
8.0
(1 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
10.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
7.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
10.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Fortify by OpenTextUpsource
Likelihood to Recommend
OpenText
It is best suited for runtime application security scanning and very useful for automation. You can seemlessly integrate with pipeline for dynamic scans. Cloud based apps can also be scanned for vulnerabilities, cross site scripting attacks. Basically all OWASP TOP 10. It is less appropriate to use if you have serverless architecture
Read full review
JetBrains
Upsource is the best review tool we've found but it still has some flaws. Notably, it makes reviewing small and quick changes less convenient than they need to be, and diff viewing (especially collaboratively) can be tedious.
It does handle larger, iterative reviews well. Especially when using a feature branch, Upsource will track that branch and automatically add all commits to the review. You can then review the branch as a whole, or look at a subset of diffs.
Read full review
Pros
OpenText
  • DAST Scanning
  • API Scanning
  • Less detection of false positive
Read full review
JetBrains
  • Automatically watch git repositories
  • Track all commits in a branch in a single commit
  • Integrates with build server to report build status of specific commits when looking at reviews/commits
  • Integrates with JetBrains IDEs
  • Ability for reviewers to add comments inline and require comments to be resolved before approval
  • Built in diff viewer, both stacked and side-by-side
Read full review
Cons
OpenText
  • Reporting could be better
  • Can be an involved setup if your organization is not using common build tools
  • Users get spammed with a lot of email updates from the service
Read full review
JetBrains
  • Creating and closing reviews isn't as quick as it could be. You must create a review, assign reviewers, approve and close. I wish there would be a quick review-approve-close for a commit where the change is simple and doesn't require multiple review iterations.
  • Web based interface can be clunky, especially when looking at big diffs side-by-side
  • JetBrains IDE integration is somehow less convenient than going using it in browser.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
OpenText
Since every firm needs to perform static code analysis on their applications, I believe Micro Focus Fortify WebInspect would work well for them (they also offer dynamic scanning, although I haven't used it myself). Different static analysis tools scan code in different ways, and Micro Focus Fortify WebInspect asks you to submit a complete build of the application along with debugging files. Depending on how your company builds its apps, this requirement may be simple or challenging.
Read full review
JetBrains
No answers on this topic
Usability
OpenText
It is a cloud-based platform which can provide us a very useful and unique features like Application Assessment, Scans, Vulnerability Test, Comprehensive Reporting, Monitoring, etc. Fortify by Open Text is also outstanding in various parameters for the support and integration and it is highly adaptable in various DevOps Program where you need secure app testing with all given features.
Read full review
JetBrains
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
OpenText
Always receive excellent support from the vendor. No issues there.
Read full review
JetBrains
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
OpenText
Fortify Application Defender is a little more timely and upfront with a lot of their information on cyber security. we like what they provide and how they communicate with our users. I think they have a good understanding and practice in their field. they seem best suited for us and the best fit.
Read full review
JetBrains
Compared to the other tools we evaluated, Upsource was the only tool that allowed distinct reviews without needing explicit pull requests while still being able to go in-depth when required. The diff viewer is serviceable and better than the alternatives, as well, especially the side-by-side viewer.
Read full review
Return on Investment
OpenText
  • DevSecOps helped in reducing efforts
  • License cost was less
  • We could roll out double the count of applications with implementation of WebInspect
Read full review
JetBrains
  • Increased our code base quality
  • Reduced the number of bugs found after deployment (bugs are found in review and fixed before deploy)
  • Improved knowledge sharing
Read full review
ScreenShots