OpenText Magellan Analytics Suite leverages a comprehensive set of data analytics software to identify patterns, relationships and trends through data visualizations and interactive dashboards.
N/A
Twitonomy
Score8 out of 10
N/A
Twitonomy is a social media analytics tool built specifically for Twitter. It provides users with features such as detailed analytics for any user, search analytics, tweet monitoring, and actionable insights through robust reporting.
N/A
Pricing
OpenText Magellan
Twitonomy
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
OpenText Magellan
Twitonomy
Free Trial
No
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Features
OpenText Magellan
Twitonomy
BI Standard Reporting
Comparison of BI Standard Reporting features of OpenText Magellan and Twitonomy
Feature
OpenText Magellan
7.0
2 Ratings
15% below category average
Twitonomy
-
Ratings
Customizable dashboards
7.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Report Formatting Templates
7.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Ad-hoc Reporting
Comparison of Ad-hoc Reporting features of OpenText Magellan and Twitonomy
Feature
OpenText Magellan
8.3
3 Ratings
4% above category average
Twitonomy
-
Ratings
Drill-down analysis
8.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Formatting capabilities
8.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Integration with R or other statistical packages
9.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Report sharing and collaboration
8.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Report Output and Scheduling
Comparison of Report Output and Scheduling features of OpenText Magellan and Twitonomy
Feature
OpenText Magellan
8.3
2 Ratings
1% above category average
Twitonomy
-
Ratings
Publish to Web
8.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Publish to PDF
8.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Report Versioning
9.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Report Delivery Scheduling
8.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Data Discovery and Visualization
Comparison of Data Discovery and Visualization features of OpenText Magellan and Twitonomy
If you do not have a large budget and are a large organization, I would steer clear of Actuate. If you are looking to do very complex washboarding, I would not use them. Your developers have to be very skilled to work with this. Plan to bring in consultants if necessary to help your process. Adhoc reporting is weak. If your pricing is user based and you expand, this could be very expensive.
Checking all its feature which are in abundant , it can help you in th growth of your business. 1. Browse, search, filter and get insights on the people you follow and those who follow you. 2. Which tweets were favorite of most of your followers. 3. Track clicks on the links in your tweets 4. Export data in multiple formats. 5. Reporting formats. 6. Get actionable insights on your followers with Followers Report
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
I am no longer working for the company that was using Actuate but I believe they would continue to use it because the stitching costs would be to high. It would require a complete rewrite of the reports and the never version of Actuate (BIRT) even required an almost complete report rewrite
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
It is quite intuitive to use. It is fit specifically for doing sentiment, emotion, and intention analysis as well as text classification and text summarization. I would have given 10 if it is fit for the purpose of doing image processing and analysis as well. There is a huge market to analyze video and image data.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
It is vastly superior to these in many ways, for complex reporting it is a much more sophisticated solution. Visualizations are very good. Javascript extensibility is very powerful, others don't support this or as well. Pentaho and MS are both OLAP oriented. Pentaho is moving more toward big data, which was not our primary focus. Others are stuck in the Crystal Reports Band metaphor.
Twitonomy helps you understand your profile's / word's / campaign's deep learning and analyse it with great reporting formats, graphs etc. It will allow you to download all these datas also. It gives real time data, fast tracking of keywords giving you an updated response and result. Checking these data you can continue to work on your campaign or you can discontinue it
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Actuate can handle 50 to 60 sub reports inside a report very well.
Dynamically creating the datasource, chart, graph, reports are the main advantages. We can do any level of drilling, and can create a performance matrix dashboard efficiently.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info