OpenText MBPM vs. SwaggerHub Explore

OpenText MBPM

SwaggerHub Explore

Overview
Product	Rating	Most Used By	Product Summary	Starting Price
OpenText MBPM	Score 7.2 out of 10	N/A	OpenText acquired BPM solution Metastorm in 2011, and has rebranded the product as OpenText MBPM. It is an alternative BPM solution to OpenText's primary BPM offering called OpenText Cordys Business Process Management.	N/A
SwaggerHub Explore	Score 0.0 out of 10	N/A	SwaggerHub Explore provides an interface for teams to interact with RESTful and Apache Kafka endpoints. By visualizing API data in a single place, teams can evaluate the capabilities and limitations of an API before investing in API integration, to accelerate the development lifecycle and streamline the software delivery workflow.	N/A

Pricing

OpenText MBPM

SwaggerHub Explore

Editions & Modules

No answers on this topic

Offerings

Pricing Offerings
OpenText MBPM	SwaggerHub Explore
Free Trial
No	No
Free/Freemium Version
No	Yes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No	No

Entry-level Setup Fee

No setup fee

Additional Details

—

More Pricing Information

Community Pulse
	OpenText MBPM	SwaggerHub Explore
Considered Both Products	OpenText MBPM Verified User Anonymous Chose OpenText MBPM We found that OpenText MBPM held its own quite well against IBM BPM. We ended up choosing OpenText MBPM due to the analytics, complex routing, and the ease of SOA service integration. Furthermore, the ability to quickly develop simple User interfaces make this tool a daily … Incentivized Helpful? Peter Green Director of Technology Chose OpenText MBPM Before first using Metastorm at a previous company, I reviewed 30 systems, shortlisted 4 and chose Metastorm as being intuitively the easiest to develop with. We have recently looked at a number of alternatives but decide to stick with OpenText BPM. Incentivized Helpful? Harish Rajput Business Excellence Manager - Lean Projects & Process Methodologies Chose OpenText MBPM Metastorm was used to meet specific client needs. Ease of use and navigation was one big factor Incentivized Helpful? Matt Temple Application Integration Analyst Chose OpenText MBPM These products are currently being reviewed for new initiatives. Metastorm will also be considered. Incentivized Helpful? Eden Mack Senior BPM Developer Chose OpenText MBPM I have evaluated [business process management] products such as Nintex, K2, and Intapp. Each of these products are excellent options, and each have strengths and weaknesses. Metastorm and K2 in my opinion offer more flexibility, but require a higher level of technical ability … Helpful?	SwaggerHub Explore No answer on this topic

Features

OpenText MBPM

SwaggerHub Explore

Reporting & Analytics

Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
	OpenText MBPM 7.0 Ratings 10% below category average	SwaggerHub Explore - Ratings
Dashboards	7.90 Ratings	00 Ratings
Standard reports	9.00 Ratings	00 Ratings
Custom reports	4.00 Ratings	00 Ratings

Process Engine

Comparison of Process Engine features of Product A and Product B
	OpenText MBPM 7.3 Ratings 13% below category average	SwaggerHub Explore - Ratings
Process designer	8.10 Ratings	00 Ratings
Process simulation	7.10 Ratings	00 Ratings
Business rules engine	9.00 Ratings	00 Ratings
SOA support	6.00 Ratings	00 Ratings
Process player	7.00 Ratings	00 Ratings
Support for modeling languages	8.00 Ratings	00 Ratings
Form builder	6.90 Ratings	00 Ratings
Model execution	6.10 Ratings	00 Ratings

Collaboration

Comparison of Collaboration features of Product A and Product B
	OpenText MBPM 7.6 Ratings 9% below category average	SwaggerHub Explore - Ratings
Social collaboration tools	7.60 Ratings	00 Ratings

Content Management Capabilties

Comparison of Content Management Capabilties features of Product A and Product B
	OpenText MBPM 6.0 Ratings 30% below category average	SwaggerHub Explore - Ratings
Content management	6.00 Ratings	00 Ratings

Best Alternatives
	OpenText MBPM	SwaggerHub Explore
Small Businesses	Square 9 Softworks Score 9.3 out of 10	NGINX Score 9.1 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies	Square 9 Softworks Score 9.3 out of 10	NGINX Score 9.1 out of 10
Enterprises	CMW Platform Score 9.4 out of 10	NGINX Score 9.1 out of 10
All Alternatives	View all alternatives	View all alternatives

User Ratings
	OpenText MBPM	SwaggerHub Explore
Likelihood to Recommend	7.1 (0 ratings)	- (0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew	8.0 (0 ratings)	- (0 ratings)
Usability	9.0 (0 ratings)	- (0 ratings)
Support Rating	10.0 (0 ratings)	- (0 ratings)
Implementation Rating	10.0 (0 ratings)	- (0 ratings)

User Testimonials
	OpenText MBPM	SwaggerHub Explore
Likelihood to Recommend	OpenText MBPM is well suited for rapid application development where process workflows are well designed in a detailed environment. A servicing organization could benefit from being able to manage and design complex case management processes and applications. It is not suited for the automotive industry where complex custom engineering processes exist within product engineering (vehicle) and manufacturing plants. Incentivized Harish Rajput Business Excellence Manager - Lean Projects & Process Methodologies Read full review	No answers on this topic
Pros	Complex routing of tasks based on calculated criteria Linking between tasks and accessing relevant information Organising, scheduling and prioritising Different views for different people Incentivized Peter Green Director of Technology Read full review	No answers on this topic
Cons	The Metastorm process engine is based on an older version of .NET. Updating to a newer version would resolve several known issues with .NET email functionality. Metastorm builds web pages at run time. While the UI presented to the end user is fine, the Document Object Model is convoluted and subject to change with new releases. Providing a more simplified DOM or at very least a custom function to replace document.getElementById() would make client-side scripting a much more powerful tool. One function that I've seen Metastorm competitors do well, is email wizards. Having a WYSIWYG email editor would be really nice. Eden Mack Senior BPM Developer Read full review	No answers on this topic
Likelihood to Renew	There are other products that seem to be a better fit for future initiatives. Incentivized Matt Temple Application Integration Analyst Read full review	No answers on this topic
Usability	Although it is intuitive to use it does require training Incentivized Harish Rajput Business Excellence Manager - Lean Projects & Process Methodologies Read full review	No answers on this topic
Support Rating	Great customer service for an API support related query Incentivized Harish Rajput Business Excellence Manager - Lean Projects & Process Methodologies Read full review	No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered	We found that OpenText MBPM held its own quite well against IBM BPM. We ended up choosing OpenText MBPM due to the analytics, complex routing, and the ease of SOA service integration. Furthermore, the ability to quickly develop simple User interfaces make this tool a daily component of our most-used toolbox components. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	No answers on this topic
Return on Investment	Easy and convenient access to client configuration information It provides numerous built-in controls which are quite useful during rapid development cycles It also provides a tremendously rich .NET framework which can be used to tweak the experience to the needs of each individual customer Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	No answers on this topic
ScreenShots		SwaggerHub Explore Screenshots