TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    OpenText UFT Digital Lab

    Score9 out of 10
    N/AFormerly from Micro Focus, a centralized lab of real mobile devices and emulators. With remote access, developers and testers can develop, debug, test, monitor, and optimize mobile apps from anywhere.N/A

    BitBar

    Score6.3 out of 10
    N/ABitBar allows users to test applications across the latest and most popular real browsers and devices. Users can scale testing by increasing test coverage and decreasing test execution time by running automated tests in parallel across browsers and devices. BitBar integrates with the user's current tech stack or CI/CD pipeline. Key Features: * BitBar offers one cloud for all testing platforms whether it be web, native, or hybrid applications. * Test an application across real…

    $39

    per month

    Pricing
    OpenText UFT Digital LabBitBar
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    OpenText UFT Digital LabBitBar
    Free Trial
    NoYes
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details—Enterprise packages are available for larger teams and customers.
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    OpenText UFT Digital LabBitBar
    Considered Both Products
    OpenText
    No answer on this topic
    SmartBear
    No answer on this topic
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    No answers on this topic
    83%
    Would buy again
    5 Answers
    Delivers good value for the price
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Delivers good value for the price
    5 Answers
    Happy with the feature set
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Happy with the feature set
    6 Answers
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation went as expected
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Implementation went as expected
    6 Answers
    Best Alternatives
    OpenText UFT Digital LabBitBar
    Small Businesses
    No answers on this topic
    TestMu AI (Formerly LambdaTest)
    Score8.9 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    No answers on this topic
    TestMu AI (Formerly LambdaTest)
    Score8.9 out of 10
    Enterprises
    Tricentis NeoLoad
    Score8.2 out of 10
    TestMu AI (Formerly LambdaTest)
    Score8.9 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    OpenText UFT Digital LabBitBar
    Likelihood to Recommend
    9.0
    (2 ratings)
    8.2
    (6 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    OpenText UFT Digital LabBitBar
    Likelihood to Recommend
    OpenText
    UFT mobile works really well if/when you need physical devices under your management. Managing physical devices in any setup is an interesting undertaking due to the various considerations per device. There are really nice best practices, for example using managed USB switches like the one from Cambrionix, that can help make for a really good experience. For us, we only have 1 application at this time that has frequent updates/releases. We are able to test out these with confidence using our suite of real/on-campus devices managed and made available by the UFT Mobile product.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    SmartBear
    CrossBrowserTesting is a great tool to use when you have a new page or new content that you want to test on an array of devices/browsers. In the diverse online world nowadays, it is nearly impossible to ensure optimization for every case. CBT allows you to get closer to that goal.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    OpenText
    • Remote access to real devices within your organization network as compared to public devices library offering, where their is a risk of exposing pre-production builds outside the organization.
    • "Factory built like" integration with HP ALM, HP Sprinter, HP UFT and HP Network Virtualization.
    • Ability to mimic real world conditions in a controlled environment in the devices of your choice.
    • Removed the guess work out of using emulators
    • Able to extend automation to mobile testing using HP UFT.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    SmartBear
    • Allows me to test on our development server with ease which is behind a firewall.
    • Using automation for my tests.
    • Screenshots of the problems on each page.
    • Ability to jump between screen sizes quickly.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    OpenText
    • Most of our problems are with the lengthy onboarding process with iOS devices.
    • Occasionally Android devices will disconnect themselves.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    SmartBear
    • Test case support is somewhat limited in customization ability.
    • Not a unique problem to them (or their 'fault'), but content behind VPN or intranet cannot be scanned.
    • Pricing with tier level and features can sometimes be confusing (ie. what is and what is not included).
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    OpenText
    The tool continues to meet our expectations and has shown that they are continually evolving the product with new features that benefit us. The most recent new feature was the auto-signing/packaging of iOS apps from the server to allow native interaction of features like biometrics. Prior this was a lengthy exercise.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    SmartBear
    No answers on this topic
    Alternatives Considered
    OpenText
    HP Mobile Center stacks well against solutions like Mobile Labs Device Connect, Perfecto Mobile and Device Anywhere. Its native integration with HP ALM and HP UFT makes it a clear choice for team already using those solutions. HP Mobile Center also provides extension to Amazon Device Library.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    SmartBear
    Selenium: 1. Selenium is Open source tool 2. Needs proper framework development and integration with multiple 3rd party tools 3. Not much secure 4. Needs scripting knowledge for people working on it 5. takes time and effort CrossBrowser Testing: 1. Licensed , so secure 2. Less time , less effort 3. Quick results 4. No scripting language knowledge needed 5. More coverage 6. Without any framework creation also we can test on multiple devices/browsers
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    OpenText
    • Efficient use of the devices. Reduced the idle time.
    • Better control over access and user management. Testing within our controlled environments.
    • Better control of device matrix.
    • Faster testing cycles. Early design bugs to development teams. Real devices means, less guess work.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    SmartBear
    • By using CrossBrowserTesting we are saving many hours a week in manual work hours.
    • Our automated Selenium tests run in a fraction of the time it takes to manually test our components, so we can spend more time building great user experiences and less time triaging bugs.
    Read full review
    ScreenShots