OpenText Web CMS vs. Progress ShareFile

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
OpenText Web CMS
Score 5.0 out of 10
N/A
OpenText Web CMS (TeamSite) accelerates and simplifies the end-to-end digital content and campaign lifecycle, from content creation and rich media management to omnichannel publication, optimization, automation, commerce, and community. According to the vendor, with TeamSite, users can: Capture diverse digital audiences with amazing brand experiences – Give customers and prospects consistent, high-quality brand experiences across devices and channels, and foster closer…N/A
Progress ShareFile
Score 8.2 out of 10
N/A
ShareFile is a cloud-based file sharing and storage service built for business. The product was acquired by Citrix Systems in 2011, and is now offered by Progress Software.
$52.80
per month 3 users (minimum)
Pricing
OpenText Web CMSProgress ShareFile
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Advanced
$17.60
per month per user (minimum 3 users)
Premium
$27.50
per month per user (minimum 3 users)
Industry Advantage
$45.83
per month per user (minimum 3 users)
Virtual Data Room
$75.00
per month per user (minimum 5 users)
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
OpenText Web CMSProgress ShareFile
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsDiscount available for annual pricing.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
OpenText Web CMSProgress ShareFile
Features
OpenText Web CMSProgress ShareFile
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
OpenText Web CMS
8.6
7 Ratings
5% above category average
Progress ShareFile
-
Ratings
Role-based user permissions8.67 Ratings00 Ratings
Platform & Infrastructure
Comparison of Platform & Infrastructure features of Product A and Product B
OpenText Web CMS
7.9
7 Ratings
2% above category average
Progress ShareFile
-
Ratings
API8.76 Ratings00 Ratings
Internationalization / multi-language7.26 Ratings00 Ratings
Web Content Creation
Comparison of Web Content Creation features of Product A and Product B
OpenText Web CMS
8.0
7 Ratings
3% above category average
Progress ShareFile
-
Ratings
WYSIWYG editor7.87 Ratings00 Ratings
Code quality / cleanliness7.76 Ratings00 Ratings
Admin section8.17 Ratings00 Ratings
Page templates7.46 Ratings00 Ratings
Library of website themes8.36 Ratings00 Ratings
Mobile optimization / responsive design8.37 Ratings00 Ratings
Publishing workflow8.17 Ratings00 Ratings
Form generator8.06 Ratings00 Ratings
Web Content Management
Comparison of Web Content Management features of Product A and Product B
OpenText Web CMS
7.9
7 Ratings
6% above category average
Progress ShareFile
-
Ratings
Content taxonomy7.97 Ratings00 Ratings
Bulk management8.27 Ratings00 Ratings
Availability / breadth of extensions7.57 Ratings00 Ratings
File Sharing & Management
Comparison of File Sharing & Management features of Product A and Product B
OpenText Web CMS
-
Ratings
Progress ShareFile
7.6
90 Ratings
9% below category average
Versioning00 Ratings7.672 Ratings
Video files00 Ratings6.254 Ratings
Audio files00 Ratings5.649 Ratings
Document collaboration00 Ratings7.877 Ratings
Access control00 Ratings8.884 Ratings
File search00 Ratings8.085 Ratings
Device sync00 Ratings9.070 Ratings
Cloud Storage Security & Administration
Comparison of Cloud Storage Security & Administration features of Product A and Product B
OpenText Web CMS
-
Ratings
Progress ShareFile
8.8
85 Ratings
2% above category average
User and role management00 Ratings9.079 Ratings
File organization00 Ratings9.185 Ratings
Device management00 Ratings8.567 Ratings
Cloud Storage Platform
Comparison of Cloud Storage Platform features of Product A and Product B
OpenText Web CMS
-
Ratings
Progress ShareFile
8.5
86 Ratings
2% below category average
Performance00 Ratings8.282 Ratings
Reliability00 Ratings8.885 Ratings
Storage Reports00 Ratings8.468 Ratings
Best Alternatives
OpenText Web CMSProgress ShareFile
Small Businesses
ManageWP
ManageWP
Score 10.0 out of 10
SugarSync
SugarSync
Score 4.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
RWS Tridion Sites
RWS Tridion Sites
Score 9.0 out of 10
Druva Security Cloud
Druva Security Cloud
Score 9.4 out of 10
Enterprises
RWS Tridion Sites
RWS Tridion Sites
Score 9.0 out of 10
Druva Security Cloud
Druva Security Cloud
Score 9.4 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
OpenText Web CMSProgress ShareFile
Likelihood to Recommend
7.4
(8 ratings)
8.2
(113 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
3.6
(1 ratings)
9.1
(8 ratings)
Usability
7.3
(1 ratings)
6.5
(26 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(1 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(14 ratings)
Support Rating
6.4
(1 ratings)
1.0
(14 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(3 ratings)
Configurability
-
(0 ratings)
6.6
(2 ratings)
Contract Terms and Pricing Model
7.3
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
-
(0 ratings)
1.0
(1 ratings)
Product Scalability
-
(0 ratings)
1.0
(1 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(1 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
OpenText Web CMSProgress ShareFile
Likelihood to Recommend
OpenText
OpenText TeamSite is well-suited to large, enterprise-wide implementations where customization, content governance, and dynamic content distribution is needed or prioritized. It is probably not ideal for smaller sites with simple architecture and few resources to manage custom implementation.
Read full review
Progress ShareFile
When we have a particularly large ad or job printing file that would "clog up" the email process, using ShareFile is very helpful. It's also useful for particular photographers we work with to upload a batch of photos all at once. Where it doesn't work as well for us is when trying to get clients to make use of a login to access folders. We find them reluctant to take on the learning curve. It works best for us when we just send them a clickable download link, and at most just require a tracking name and email address.
Read full review
Pros
OpenText
  • The drag and drop forms feature makes publishing simple and quick.
  • Preview of customer data before sending publications helps us to deliver personalized experiences.
Read full review
Progress ShareFile
  • Secure File Storage and Sharing.
  • Workflows to get customer/affiliate responses to comments on documents.
  • I used to have the signature feature initially, but it was removed from the original plan, so I could only use it if I chose to select the higher plan price.
  • I love the upload notifications and reports on user activity.
  • The document storage versions are fantastic. I am the only user with Delete privileges, and I love that I can make those selections.
  • Integrations with Microsoft 365 - FANTASTIC - thank you.
Read full review
Cons
OpenText
  • I have recommendation for improvements.
  • It is easy to work with all the features.
  • All necessary content management tools are included.
Read full review
Progress ShareFile
  • The web console is not the most user friendly site to use to get to, and send my files.
  • We have had users that have not liked the change in workflow to get files from Progress ShareFile when they were used to just clicking on files on an email.
  • That management of the tools are not the most user friendly. There have been some improvements but keeping up with certs and setting up new users can be more work than expected.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
OpenText
No answers on this topic
Progress ShareFile
It's a highly effective and secure storage system, has robust workarounds for serving the various equipment limits of our users, meets high security requirements of HIPAA standards, significantly reduces our needs for producing paper trails.
Read full review
Usability
OpenText
Overall, it's a solid package with the potential to offer much functionality with appropriate resources applied. There are a few issues with the authoring interface that OpenText should address before its a top shelf authoring experience.
Read full review
Progress ShareFile
ShareFile is so easy to use I was able to download all of my projects files and have them set up to sync before my supervisor could even come over to explain the process to me. It is a neatly organized and intuitive software that allows even the less tech-savvy to become power users.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
OpenText
No answers on this topic
Progress ShareFile
The software has never been down when I needed to use it.
Read full review
Performance
OpenText
No answers on this topic
Progress ShareFile
Easy to use, easy to integrate with Outlook. I only gave it a 9 because I have found that sometimes it does not play nicely with Outlook and can slow it down. But, when that happens (not frequent), I restart Outlook and all is well again
Read full review
Support Rating
OpenText
Our technical resources engage with OpenText TeamSite so I don't have direct experience. However, critical issues that we need help with seem to get the attention they deserve without issue. However, training and user resources for business owner roles are a bit lacking and some annoying issues with the authoring interface should be addressed sooner.
Read full review
Progress ShareFile
Citrix was generally responsive and helpful in solving technical issues. Like any cloud based SaaS product there is a danger that it may go down. This was a rare occurrence over my three years of using the product. The more common issue we encountered was clients forgetting their login which was easily managed through a forgot password functionality.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
OpenText
No answers on this topic
Progress ShareFile
Good documentation for the API. With a little help from RS tech staff, any competent programmer should be able to integrate RightSignature with an existing system in a week or three. That help is easy to get as well
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
OpenText
It offers more content editing features at a relatively low cost thus overall deployment is lower in cost. It has great customer support who are always there to support and answer to our needs thus making the process of deployment seamless at every stage and offering training for working with their product.
Read full review
Progress ShareFile
ShareFile is easier and does what you need. I have moved a few organizations from SharePoint to ShareFile. Just easier. You can setup different areas for different departments, setup their permissions and it is easy enough for them to do what they want in their zones. The mobile app works great as well. So you can all the features you really use from SP, but just easier to setup and use.
Read full review
Contract Terms and Pricing Model
OpenText
The annual contract should be clearer in terms of the breakdown of user license types (system admin, admin, regular user, etc).
Read full review
Progress ShareFile
No answers on this topic
Scalability
OpenText
No answers on this topic
Progress ShareFile
I am a one person office. I have no idea how this software would scale to a larger office.
Read full review
Return on Investment
OpenText
  • We integrated with google analytics, now we have the proper comprehension of our audience data reception and behaviors - we've greatly improved on personalized marketing.
  • Quick publication of content across the main digital channels.
  • We run our digital campaigns swiftly.
  • We've maintained our brand consistency for three years.
Read full review
Progress ShareFile
  • All of our clients and consulting engineers find ShareFile easy to use, thus complementing our business.
  • Our staff also find ShareFile intuitive, accessible, and easy to use, making it an ideal, everyday indispensable desktop tool for everyone in our company.
  • ShareFile can be linked to our firm's primary website as a placed for private use. We haven't found need for this yet, but might in the future.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Progress ShareFile Screenshots

Screenshot of the ShareFile dashboardScreenshot of ShareFile's Outlook PluginScreenshot of the Projects interfaceScreenshot of ShareFile's link sharing optionsScreenshot of ShareFile's e-signature