OpenText Web CMS vs. RWS Tridion Sites

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
OpenText Web CMS
Score 5.0 out of 10
N/A
OpenText Web CMS (TeamSite) accelerates and simplifies the end-to-end digital content and campaign lifecycle, from content creation and rich media management to omnichannel publication, optimization, automation, commerce, and community. According to the vendor, with TeamSite, users can: Capture diverse digital audiences with amazing brand experiences – Give customers and prospects consistent, high-quality brand experiences across devices and channels, and foster closer…N/A
RWS Tridion Sites
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
RWS Tridion Sites provides web content management capabilities, connecting people, processes, and information across teams, brands, and markets, to deliver impactful online experiences globally. RWS Tridion Sites' DPX platform enables the use of either traditional or headless publishing. It includes advanced features such as automated personalization, multilingual capabilities and Semantic AI. The BluePrinting® technology at the core of RWS Tridion Sites simplifies reuse and…N/A
Pricing
OpenText Web CMSRWS Tridion Sites
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
OpenText Web CMSRWS Tridion Sites
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
OpenText Web CMSRWS Tridion Sites
Features
OpenText Web CMSRWS Tridion Sites
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
OpenText Web CMS
8.6
7 Ratings
5% above category average
RWS Tridion Sites
9.0
9 Ratings
9% above category average
Role-based user permissions8.67 Ratings9.09 Ratings
Platform & Infrastructure
Comparison of Platform & Infrastructure features of Product A and Product B
OpenText Web CMS
7.9
7 Ratings
2% above category average
RWS Tridion Sites
9.1
8 Ratings
16% above category average
API8.76 Ratings8.36 Ratings
Internationalization / multi-language7.26 Ratings10.07 Ratings
Web Content Creation
Comparison of Web Content Creation features of Product A and Product B
OpenText Web CMS
8.0
7 Ratings
3% above category average
RWS Tridion Sites
8.5
8 Ratings
9% above category average
WYSIWYG editor7.87 Ratings8.08 Ratings
Code quality / cleanliness7.76 Ratings8.07 Ratings
Admin section8.17 Ratings9.08 Ratings
Page templates7.46 Ratings9.08 Ratings
Library of website themes8.36 Ratings8.24 Ratings
Mobile optimization / responsive design8.37 Ratings9.07 Ratings
Publishing workflow8.17 Ratings9.08 Ratings
Form generator8.06 Ratings8.33 Ratings
Web Content Management
Comparison of Web Content Management features of Product A and Product B
OpenText Web CMS
7.9
7 Ratings
6% above category average
RWS Tridion Sites
7.6
8 Ratings
2% above category average
Content taxonomy7.97 Ratings9.07 Ratings
Bulk management8.27 Ratings9.08 Ratings
Availability / breadth of extensions7.57 Ratings8.35 Ratings
SEO support00 Ratings9.06 Ratings
Community / comment management00 Ratings3.03 Ratings
Best Alternatives
OpenText Web CMSRWS Tridion Sites
Small Businesses
ManageWP
ManageWP
Score 10.0 out of 10
ManageWP
ManageWP
Score 10.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
RWS Tridion Sites
RWS Tridion Sites
Score 9.0 out of 10
Storyblok
Storyblok
Score 9.5 out of 10
Enterprises
RWS Tridion Sites
RWS Tridion Sites
Score 9.0 out of 10
Storyblok
Storyblok
Score 9.5 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
OpenText Web CMSRWS Tridion Sites
Likelihood to Recommend
7.4
(8 ratings)
9.9
(22 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
3.6
(1 ratings)
6.3
(15 ratings)
Usability
7.3
(1 ratings)
8.5
(2 ratings)
Support Rating
6.4
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Contract Terms and Pricing Model
7.3
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
OpenText Web CMSRWS Tridion Sites
Likelihood to Recommend
OpenText
OpenText TeamSite is well-suited to large, enterprise-wide implementations where customization, content governance, and dynamic content distribution is needed or prioritized. It is probably not ideal for smaller sites with simple architecture and few resources to manage custom implementation.
Read full review
RWS Group
Love the product and I really like how we use it for public sites. The only negative aspect is that it is just hard to find Tridion devs that understand the tool, grasp .net, react, and understand the blueprint, etc.
Read full review
Pros
OpenText
  • The drag and drop forms feature makes publishing simple and quick.
  • Preview of customer data before sending publications helps us to deliver personalized experiences.
Read full review
RWS Group
  • Makes it easy to spin up a new site quickly
  • Allows for numerous users to work on the same site without conflicting with each other's changes
  • Allows you to unpublish changes or revert to old versions if you make a mistake
  • Allows you to time publishing actions (for example, you can set it to happen overnight)
Read full review
Cons
OpenText
  • I have recommendation for improvements.
  • It is easy to work with all the features.
  • All necessary content management tools are included.
Read full review
RWS Group
  • Tridion is complicated in enough ways that it makes it difficult to train new users. Therefore, we have to limit the number of people with access to the system since we have not yet implemented Workflow.
  • When something goes wrong (items fail to publish, or there is unexpected behavior with components), there is little explanation provided that would point us in the right direction to troubleshoot. As a result, content Authors and Editors have to frequently ask for IT assistance.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
OpenText
No answers on this topic
RWS Group
I am giving this a semi-high rating because we have already got Tridion up and running and we are still in the process of moving the sites over to Tridion. It is unlikely we will be moving things to a new CMS AGAIN in the near future as the cost to get Tridion was high.
Read full review
Usability
OpenText
Overall, it's a solid package with the potential to offer much functionality with appropriate resources applied. There are a few issues with the authoring interface that OpenText should address before its a top shelf authoring experience.
Read full review
RWS Group
The editor user interface is very user friendly and in-site editing makes simple updates fast and easy. The extensibility of Tridion is a big plus and the ability to add our own options into the default Tridion interface helps us integrate with external systems. Finally, the user permissions and security system helps us deploy it within our large organization.
Read full review
Support Rating
OpenText
Our technical resources engage with OpenText TeamSite so I don't have direct experience. However, critical issues that we need help with seem to get the attention they deserve without issue. However, training and user resources for business owner roles are a bit lacking and some annoying issues with the authoring interface should be addressed sooner.
Read full review
RWS Group
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
OpenText
It offers more content editing features at a relatively low cost thus overall deployment is lower in cost. It has great customer support who are always there to support and answer to our needs thus making the process of deployment seamless at every stage and offering training for working with their product.
Read full review
RWS Group
It is a nuclear missile compared to the other handguns and knives on the market today. But it also requires nuclear technicians and expertise that a handgun doesn't require. Do you need to decimate your competition and you have the investment capabilities necessary to put a nuclear missile into the sky? Then definitely do it. Especially if you need a very good multi-lingual blueprint provider like Tridion.
Read full review
Contract Terms and Pricing Model
OpenText
The annual contract should be clearer in terms of the breakdown of user license types (system admin, admin, regular user, etc).
Read full review
RWS Group
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
OpenText
  • We integrated with google analytics, now we have the proper comprehension of our audience data reception and behaviors - we've greatly improved on personalized marketing.
  • Quick publication of content across the main digital channels.
  • We run our digital campaigns swiftly.
  • We've maintained our brand consistency for three years.
Read full review
RWS Group
  • SDL is a very complex system. Creating custom components by external vendors turned out to be expensive.
  • The learning curve is very slow, so training takes a lot of time and cost.
  • The revamped corporate site looks clean, modern, and is mobile-friendly.
Read full review
ScreenShots