Oracle Database vs. Splunk Enterprise

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Oracle Database
Score 8.2 out of 10
N/A
Oracle Database, currently in edition 23ai, is a converged, multimodel database management system. It is designed to simplify development for AI, microservices, graph, document, spatial, and relational applications.
$0.05
per hour
Splunk Enterprise
Score 8.6 out of 10
N/A
Splunk is software for searching, monitoring, and analyzing machine-generated big data, via a web-style interface. It captures, indexes and correlates real-time data in a searchable repository from which it can generate graphs, reports, alerts, dashboards and visualizations.N/A
Pricing
Oracle DatabaseSplunk Enterprise
Editions & Modules
Oracle Base Database Service - Standard
$0.0538
per hour
Oracle Base Database Service - Enterprise
$0.1075
per hour
Oracle Base Database Service - High Performance
$0.2218
per hour
Standard Edition
Contact Sales
Enterprise Edition
Contact Sales
Personal Edition
Contact Sales
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Oracle DatabaseSplunk Enterprise
Free Trial
YesYes
Free/Freemium Version
YesYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Oracle DatabaseSplunk Enterprise
Considered Both Products
Oracle Database
Chose Oracle Database
Oracle stands out among other databases in terms of performance, availability, reliability, and security. It is capable of handling massive loads and heavy OLTP transactions. Oracle database is feature rich and provides various tools for analytics, monitoring and performance …
Chose Oracle Database
Our primary purpose for originally selecting Oracle Database was for housing SAP and there were no other options.
Chose Oracle Database
Because of a rich user base and support for any critical issue, this is one of the best options to choose. In case the project has a TCO issue, it can compromise and choose Postgres as the best alternative. SQL server is also good and easy to code and maintain but performance …
Chose Oracle Database
Oracle is placed in a good spot against its competitors. It has advantages over its competitors in its legacy stability and high availability. A common engine to handle relational, JSON, Vector, and graph data makes it more cost-effective. Given all the good features, the …
Chose Oracle Database
The Oracle database was selected before I started working on the project, so I can't tell the reasons behind the choice. However, it was recognized as the best suited for holding several million records for related entities and was preferred over NoSQL options.
Chose Oracle Database
Microsoft SQL Server, PostgreSQL and MySQL
Chose Oracle Database
I have selected Oracle database from other databases as this database is relational database which stored the data in structural and tabular format which is better than any other databases which I have used in my carrier. Also MongoDB is no SQL database where we can use SQL …
Chose Oracle Database
Oracle Database is best in business, consistent, and robust. Even the standard version is sufficient for the best performance. The main thing is I have never seen corruption and in my opinion, it is best when used with Linux.
Chose Oracle Database
In my opinion, Oracle Database is highly reliable, has better performance with large databases and little to no maintenance once everything is setup. Also, recovery of the Oracle database is much simpler and easier.
Chose Oracle Database
Oracle Machine Learning is completely different when compared to HCM or Hyperion. I can say that the data collected from HCM or hyperion enterprise can be used on Oracle Machine Learning to perform an analysis to predict the future business.
Chose Oracle Database
Microsoft SQL is just as stable and almost as sellable with a much lower cost of ownership (staff and licensing). But as our primary application doesn't support Microsoft SQL we had to license Oracle.
Chose Oracle Database
Oracle Database is among the easiest to integrate with, program against, have a reliable cluster with DR, and has the most understood and well-documented databases. It suits really well if the software shop is primarily Java-based, and deals with large volumes of data with a …
Chose Oracle Database
Azure databases is another cloud database that I had used in some .net platform based projects. Both of the cloud database services are identical in nature of usage but very different in scope of usage. But this doesn't mean that the Oracle Database Cloud Service stacks up …
Chose Oracle Database
Performance is much better than other RDBMS. Oracle supports better transaction management. It has wide range of features and we don't need to use different types of databases to finish an application requirement.
Chose Oracle Database
It depends on the use case. Oracle database is for everyone, but if it's a lightweight application, MySQL might be an easier choice.
Chose Oracle Database
Most are complements to enhance the benefits of the Oracle database. I selected and evaluated Oracle databases because it is the most used suite in the organization and it is important for me to mention strengths and points to improve.
Chose Oracle Database
Sorry this product was not selected by me, but was a legacy install that was upgraded. I see the value in the product, however, I was not involved in the selection process.
Chose Oracle Database
Oracle is more of an enterprise-level database than Access and SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise isn't getting developed much (some people wonder how close it is to end of life) but SQL Server is miles ahead of Oracle IMO in terms of user experience and comparable in terms of …
Chose Oracle Database
We use SQL Server for other modules of our MLFF Tolling System, so I work on a daily basic with both database engines. Oracle is recognized and distinguished by scalability and performance, ensuring a secure environment to host our critical data that comes from multiple …
Chose Oracle Database
MySQL, Oracle Application Express, Oracle SQL Developer and Oracle Java SE
Chose Oracle Database
We use IBM DB2 in AS400 to handle part of our accounting system and our legacy ERP. We are migrating all functionalities to Oracle Database 12c because it is more secure and stable. We have some applications using SQL Server but we want to handle those systems in it because at …
Chose Oracle Database
Well, I use all sorts of databases at once as it's part of customer requirement.
Chose Oracle Database
We initially looked at MS Dynamics but it would have required a lot of customization and 3rd party solution providers which drove the cost up.
Splunk Enterprise
Chose Splunk Enterprise
Personally, I haven't really looked at anything else that really hasn't been my domain, so not until recently.
Chose Splunk Enterprise
CrowdStrike Next-Gen SIEM
Chose Splunk Enterprise
Splunk could sort a much better log correlation than it competitors. dynatrace have better dashboards, but its harder to setup and in our case, way too expensive. with Splunk, no one regrets migrating from Qradar. it looks like different generations tools. the correlation is …
Chose Splunk Enterprise
Splunk is costly, but easier to maintain. Reliability is a key factor, and most products have issue. While DataDog is very costly, even to Splunk.
Chose Splunk Enterprise
Splunk Enterprise has been a well-established solution for many clients for a long time and is a major player in the market. Its track record and performance make it the best choice. Furthermore, its ease of use for developing, using, and managing data makes it the best among …
Chose Splunk Enterprise
Splunk Enterprise stands out compared to other solutions due to its broad compatibility and flexibility. It integrates easily with a wide range of infrastructure, network, security, and application products, thanks to its support for multiple data formats and its extensive …
Chose Splunk Enterprise
Splunk is the undisputed leader in Security Information and Event Management. Splunk Enterprise Security allows for massive, complex correlation of data across disparate sources. It can be deployed entirely on-premise or in a private cloud, giving total "data sovereignty." …
Chose Splunk Enterprise
Elastic Beats and Apache Kafka
Chose Splunk Enterprise
Okay for dashboards but very limited for ad-hoc searches, no deep dive
Chose Splunk Enterprise
Splunk Enterprise stacks similarly to IBM's qradar and outperforms both Palo Alto's Panorama and Cisco's Secure Firewall Management Center in regards to storing large amounts of logs and the ability for quick searches. Splunk Enterprise handles queries of data effectively and …
Chose Splunk Enterprise
Splunk Enterprise is a very seasoned software , while other comparable software keep on adding new features and keep evolving, Splunk Enterprise has reached a state where new user onboarded doesnt have to request any basic feature or develop modules to simple tasks. Log parsing …
Chose Splunk Enterprise
Splunk does a good job at log aggregation and compatibility however, integrations with other products is been a challenge. Especially the pricing can be more competitive to spice up the market and orgs looking to explore AI based logging over traditional practices.
Chose Splunk Enterprise
Able to show more than Log data in Splunk views, we tested several plug-ins during a small pilot, and we were able to bring O/S (Win/Unix/Linux) & APM data metrics into the same views as Logged data. I've seen others use it to visualize a wider range of data types, too...better …
Chose Splunk Enterprise
While both are market-leading SIEM platforms, they cater to different environments and organization priorities. The choice often comes down to a company's existing infrastructure, integration needs, and long-term security strategy.
Deployment and architecture - Splunk offeres …
Chose Splunk Enterprise
They do provide an overwhelming level of information, which is hard to use.
Chose Splunk Enterprise
Splunk features of storing data and ingestion of logs , indexing of data , data analytics make is superior to other tools.
Definately there is more improvement requirement in terms of visualisation of data but one stop for all features make splunk better than various other …
Chose Splunk Enterprise
Splunk Enterprise was already chosen by our organization to be used across teams. However, the reasoning I know behind is the ability to share events/messages across different message brokers and making onboarding easier to legacy teams by just simple configuration.
Chose Splunk Enterprise
Splunk was better in terms of analyzing unstructured data. Also Splunk has had a very good and strong community and is also has a more tried and tested performance. I personally found the dash boarding capability of Splunk better than datadog.

We also analyzed using Kibana. …
Chose Splunk Enterprise
Omnibus was a Linux based tool. Not very easy to sue. End user needs to know Linux commands. Splunk Enterprise is more flexible and ease to use. Splunk Enterprise can generate reports, graphs, data visualization, data validation and much more. Use friendly query language and …
Chose Splunk Enterprise
A lot of products have natively inside their own dashboards and or their own logging repositories. And each one is difficult to learn or they're too complex or they're not verbose in the sense that they're not easy to mine the data that you're looking for. So that could be …
Chose Splunk Enterprise
Elastic and it's a little bit more cumbersome and a little bit more time consuming. Using Splunk is much easier flow and quicker to utilize to get to the root of a problem.
Chose Splunk Enterprise
Splunk AppDynamics and Elastic Observability
Chose Splunk Enterprise
Cost was major factor which made us choose Splunk Enterprisek.
Splunk Enterprise is versatile tool which further helped us to make our decision.
Apart from that Managment wish to use something robust hence Splunk Enterprise became there first choice.
Chose Splunk Enterprise
Splunk Enterprise is honestly the first tool we used and we cant realistically switch. We have not done any in depth studies or comparisons. We know there are alternatives and we would probably switch if one of them was much more economically viable, but right now we are happy …
Features
Oracle DatabaseSplunk Enterprise
Relational Databases
Comparison of Relational Databases features of Product A and Product B
Oracle Database
8.3
Ratings
3% above category average
Splunk Enterprise
-
Ratings
ACID compliance8.40 Ratings00 Ratings
Database monitoring8.70 Ratings00 Ratings
Database locking8.70 Ratings00 Ratings
Encryption9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Disaster recovery8.80 Ratings00 Ratings
Flexible deployment6.40 Ratings00 Ratings
Multiple datatypes8.10 Ratings00 Ratings
Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)
Comparison of Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) features of Product A and Product B
Oracle Database
-
Ratings
Splunk Enterprise
8.2
Ratings
4% above category average
Centralized event and log data collection00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Correlation00 Ratings8.40 Ratings
Event and log normalization/management00 Ratings8.40 Ratings
Deployment flexibility00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Integration with Identity and Access Management Tools00 Ratings8.20 Ratings
Custom dashboards and workspaces00 Ratings8.70 Ratings
Host and network-based intrusion detection00 Ratings7.80 Ratings
Data integration/API management00 Ratings8.30 Ratings
Behavioral analytics and baselining00 Ratings7.70 Ratings
Rules-based and algorithmic detection thresholds00 Ratings7.80 Ratings
Response orchestration and automation00 Ratings7.50 Ratings
Reporting and compliance management00 Ratings8.60 Ratings
Incident indexing/searching00 Ratings8.70 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Oracle DatabaseSplunk Enterprise
Small Businesses
InterSystems IRIS
InterSystems IRIS
Score 8.1 out of 10
LevelBlue USM Anywhere
LevelBlue USM Anywhere
Score 8.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
InterSystems IRIS
InterSystems IRIS
Score 8.1 out of 10
Sumo Logic
Sumo Logic
Score 8.8 out of 10
Enterprises
SAP IQ
SAP IQ
Score 5.9 out of 10
Sumo Logic
Sumo Logic
Score 8.8 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Oracle DatabaseSplunk Enterprise
Likelihood to Recommend
8.2
(0 ratings)
8.7
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
9.0
(0 ratings)
8.5
(0 ratings)
Usability
7.6
(0 ratings)
8.5
(0 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
7.0
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Online Training
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
9.6
(0 ratings)
7.0
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Oracle DatabaseSplunk Enterprise
Likelihood to Recommend
We migrated from NoSQL to an Oracle database. One of the reasons was robust backup and recovery options available in the Oracle database, which provide zero data loss. A transactional database like Oracle is a better fit for our use case than NoSQL. On a large scale, deployment was evaluated as a cheaper option than the NoSQL engine. This conclusion came even after considering Oracle license is expensive.
Read full review
I'm liking the newer products, and I'm looking forward to how they integrate with the overall product when they come together. Just log in and be able to query a large number of systems for similar issues or a unique one. That is a great fit for Splunk Enterprise, looking for a simple case or a simple String or something of that nature across multiple machines. It's a great fit for that to identify issues or particular software, whatever your scenario is, String, to find it across any particular server or group of servers, so that you can update or do a deployment or whatever it is you're looking to do.
Read full review
Pros
  • Best thing about it is that it supports PL/SQL which is helpful in writing complex quarries easily.
  • Its storage capacity , backup and recovery features make it the best database storage tool available.
  • Other thing I like about this software is its interface is so good.
Read full review
  • Real-time + Scheduled alerts - i-e you can set up alerts which are actively monitoring your logs
  • Pretty good response time for search results. With our key/value logging, Splunk makes it blazing fast to query the data.
  • Dashboards provide insights into historical data
  • Love how Splunk indexes all of the data and provides keys to search on
Read full review
Cons
  • The memory demand and management makes it impossible to run it in a container.
  • It is hard to perform local unit testing with Oracle even using the personal edition (aggressive all the available memory grab for itself).
  • Lack of built in database migrations (e.g. as Flyway).
  • The need to install the Oracle client in addition to its drivers.
  • The cost of running it, especially in the Cloud.
  • Comes with very spartan community grade client/management tools whereas the commercial offerings tend to demand a premium price.
Read full review
  • At times some queries can run slowly if indices are not on a portion of the query you use.
  • Setup time initially can be difficult if your logs aren't stored in common locations or in a common way to write the log.
  • Ability to ingest logs from different locations without having to change code to put logs in a certain place (pro and con).
  • Searches can be a bit more difficult to look through if your log isn't pulled in a manner that is easy to read through splunk.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
It is very likely to use this 12c (or next version) of Oracle Database. Nothing close to it in the marketplace in terms of performance, reliability and overall database management efficiency. If Oracle did one thing really good - it is it's OLTP Database I must say.
Read full review
We are using Splunk extensively in our projects and we have recently upgraded to Splunk version 6.0 which is quite efficient and giving expected results. We keep track of updates and new features Splunk introduces periodically and try to introduce those features in our day to day activities for improvement in our reporting system and other tasks.
Read full review
Usability
Many of the powerful options can be auto-configured but there are still many things to take into account at the moment of installing and configuring an Oracle Database, compared with SQL Server or other databases. At the same time, that extra complexity allows for detailed configuration and guarantees performance, scalability, availability and security.
Read full review
Splunk usability could be a little more friendly on correlations and log analysis. not for end users, but for the tech team, sometimes is hard to find good professionals to set up integrations and new dashboards when needed. For the high-level management, it can be overwhelming to read Splunk dashboards.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
No answers on this topic
When properly setup and configured, Splunk is extremely reliable.
Read full review
Support Rating
1. I have very good experience with Oracle Database support team. Oracle support team has pool of talented Oracle Analyst resources in different regions. To name a few regions - EMEA, Asia, USA(EST, MST, PST), Australia. Their support staffs are very supportive, well trained, and customer focused. Whenever I open Oracle Sev1 SR(service request), I always get prompt update on my case timely. 2. Oracle has zoom call and chat session option linked to Oracle SR. Whenever you are in Oracle portal - you can chat with the Oracle Analyst who is working on your case. You can request for Oracle zoom call thru which you can share the your problem server screen in no time. This is very nice as it saves lot of time and energy in case you have to follow up with oracle support for your case. 3.Oracle has excellent knowledge base in which all the customer databases critical problems and their solutions are well documented. It is very easy to follow without consulting to support team at first.
Read full review
Splunk maintains a well resourced support system that has been consistent since we purchased the product. They help out in a timely manner and provide expert level information as needed. We typically open cases online and communicate when possible via e-mail and are able to resolve most issues with that method.
Read full review
Online Training
No answers on this topic
The online course was simple clear and described the main capabilities of the solution. There is also an initial module that can be done for free so anyone can familiarize themselves with the functionality of this solution. On the other hand, however, there could be more free online courses. Maybe even with a certificate, this would broaden the group of people who are familiar with the platform while increasing familiarity with the solution itself.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Overall the implementation went very well and after that everything came out as expected - in terms of performance and scalability. People should always install and upgrade a stable version for production with the latest patch set updates, test properly as much as possible, and should have a backup plan if anything unexpected happens
Read full review
Smooth without too many major issues.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Because of a rich user base and support for any critical issue, this is one of the best options to choose. In case the project has a TCO issue, it can compromise and choose Postgres as the best alternative. SQL server is also good and easy to code and maintain but performance is not as good as the Oracle
Read full review
A lot of products have natively inside their own dashboards and or their own logging repositories. And each one is difficult to learn or they're too complex or they're not verbose in the sense that they're not easy to mine the data that you're looking for. So that could be anything from the native logging that you find in other Cisco products. It's easier to use Splunk to draw the data that you're looking for as opposed to going to the individual's products themselves to get the logs that you're looking for.
Read full review
Scalability
No answers on this topic
Splunk can scale in to the petabyte per day range which of course is awesome
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Our product's ability to monitor the Oracle database has generated significant revenue from only a few customers, totaling $1mn.
  • An Oracle account helps analyze the patches and changes going into it, enabling the team to enhance the product and update it more quickly. It reduced the effort by more than 50%.
  • Being a closed-source code DBMS, it is difficult to ascertain the exact exploits of the vulnerability to provide patches to customers and requires reverse engineering.
Read full review
  • Ease of collecting IP for blacklisting.
  • Generation of metrics against compromised accounts based on location and time of the year. It helped in launching phishing education campaign before hitting the most vulnerable month of the year.
  • It helped in neutralizing vulnerable word-press sites across the campus, leading to the decrease of account compromise.
Read full review
ScreenShots