Oracle WebCenter Content is Oracle's ECM Suite. This product is tightly integrated to other Oracle products and provides ECM functionality to Siebel CRM and PeopleSoft. The WebCenter product family also includes Oracle's CMS (WebCenter Sites) which they acquired from FatWire.
N/A
Socialtext (discontinued)
Score10 out of 10
N/A
Social Text was a tool that focused on social learning and includes Twitter-like microblogging capabilities. The product competed with MindTouch,Confluence, Jive Team Collaboration and other collaboration platforms. It was acquired by PeopleFluent in 2012 and is no longer available as a separate product, though similar capabilities are supplied by the PeopleFluent platform.
$1
Starting Price Per Month
Pricing
Oracle WebCenter Content
Socialtext (discontinued)
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Socialtext
$1.00
Starting Price Per Month
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Oracle WebCenter Content
Socialtext (discontinued)
Free Trial
No
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Features
Oracle WebCenter Content
Socialtext (discontinued)
Enterprise Content Management
Comparison of Enterprise Content Management features of Oracle WebCenter Content and Socialtext (discontinued)
Feature
Oracle WebCenter Content
7.6
4 Ratings
6% below category average
Socialtext (discontinued)
-
Ratings
Content capture & imaging
7.94 Ratings
00 Ratings
File sync, storage & archiving
8.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
Document management
8.64 Ratings
00 Ratings
Records management
7.24 Ratings
00 Ratings
Content search & retrieval
8.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
Enterprise content collaboration
9.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Content publishing & creation
6.93 Ratings
00 Ratings
Security, risk management & information governance
7.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Contract lifecycle management
7.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Automated workflows
7.12 Ratings
00 Ratings
Artificial intelligence
6.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Integration
8.72 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Management
Comparison of Project Management features of Oracle WebCenter Content and Socialtext (discontinued)
Feature
Oracle WebCenter Content
-
Ratings
Socialtext (discontinued)
7.6
1 Ratings
2% below category average
Task Management
00 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Gantt Charts
00 Ratings
7.01 Ratings
Scheduling
00 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Workflow Automation
00 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Mobile Access
00 Ratings
4.01 Ratings
Search
00 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Visual planning tools
00 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Communication
Comparison of Communication features of Oracle WebCenter Content and Socialtext (discontinued)
WebCenter Content is suitable for payables invoice processing for companies with a huge volume of paper invoices. 80% of data entry effort can be reduced. For small companies with less volume, WebCenter may not make sense. WebCenter is not perfect. It has some issues. We raised enhancement requests with Oracle, hopefully, Oracle will resolve them soon.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
We use Social Text as a platform to air our issues with different departments. We voice our concerns and suggestions so we can help find a solution to the problems we incur on a daily basis. We need to have social text as an app so we can communicate in real time not only during work hours.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Search needs a ton of improvements. It was very slow a year ago
Search result quality was also not that good
I know they have improved their UI recently but when i used it last year it did not really have any design elements which could be used to make the articles look more presentable. It was important for us as we used it for external communication as well.
The challenges with converting to a completely new system create quite a barrier to switching to anything else. If we find another system that offers guaranteed improvements to the user interface -- as well as as a more coherent set of options for data interchanges with current and future enterprise data sources -- we would be more interested in swithing to that new product. Of course, the expense in purchasing competitor system, along with the costs of migrating all current content, along with retooling all existing workflows in place, would be carefully weighed against the benefits incurred from a switch-over.
I can't really provide an answer for this question because I think the basic premise is flawed. Which system an organization selects is based (or should be based) on their unique business and organizational requirements, not the features of the system. We do not recommend a particular solution to a client based on subjective preference for one system over another but rather for its appropriateness to achieve a particular goal or collection of goals.
I frankly like Confluence better than socialtext because of the speed and the quality of search. They also have better design elements which can help make the articles pleasant to the eyes.
We were looking for a scalable solution for invoice processing needs. WebCenter did fit the bill. It reduced manual data entry effort by 80%.
WebCenter saved our storage costs. We do not need to store the physical paper copies anymore in our expensive offices.
WebCenter increased the employee engagement and reduced monotonous data entry work. Employees now have time to spend on value-added work rather than data entry.
Auditors were happy with the tool, as they can retrieve any document with the click of a button as opposed to search and find a physical document.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info