TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Oracle WebCenter Content

    Score9.4 out of 10
    N/AOracle WebCenter Content is Oracle's ECM Suite. This product is tightly integrated to other Oracle products and provides ECM functionality to Siebel CRM and PeopleSoft. The WebCenter product family also includes Oracle's CMS (WebCenter Sites) which they acquired from FatWire.N/A

    Tungsten Capture

    Score9.5 out of 10
    N/ATungsten Capture (formerly Kofax Capture) is a suite of multichannel document capture applications.

    $3,500

    per year

    Pricing
    Oracle WebCenter ContentTungsten Capture
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    Kofax Capture
    $3,500
    per year
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Oracle WebCenter ContentTungsten Capture
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Features
    Oracle WebCenter ContentTungsten Capture
    Enterprise Content Management
    Comparison of Enterprise Content Management features of Oracle WebCenter Content and Tungsten Capture
    Feature
    Oracle WebCenter Content
    7.6
    4 Ratings
    6% below category average
    Tungsten Capture
    -
    Ratings
    Content capture & imaging7.94 Ratings00 Ratings
    File sync, storage & archiving8.04 Ratings00 Ratings
    Document management8.64 Ratings00 Ratings
    Records management7.24 Ratings00 Ratings
    Content search & retrieval8.04 Ratings00 Ratings
    Enterprise content collaboration9.02 Ratings00 Ratings
    Content publishing & creation6.93 Ratings00 Ratings
    Security, risk management & information governance7.03 Ratings00 Ratings
    Contract lifecycle management7.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Automated workflows7.12 Ratings00 Ratings
    Artificial intelligence6.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Integration8.72 Ratings00 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    Oracle WebCenter ContentTungsten Capture
    Small Businesses
    Egnyte
    Score9.3 out of 10
    M‑Files
    Score8.9 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    Epicor ECM
    Score7.7 out of 10
    Esker
    Score7.4 out of 10
    Enterprises
    Dashpivot - By Sitemate
    Score10 out of 10
    DocuWare
    Score7.7 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    Oracle WebCenter ContentTungsten Capture
    Likelihood to Recommend
    7.2
    (6 ratings)
    9.2
    (9 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    7.9
    (2 ratings)
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    Usability
    6.0
    (1 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    Support Rating
    5.0
    (1 ratings)
    5.0
    (1 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Oracle WebCenter ContentTungsten Capture
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Oracle
    WebCenter Content is suitable for payables invoice processing for companies with a huge volume of paper invoices. 80% of data entry effort can be reduced. For small companies with less volume, WebCenter may not make sense. WebCenter is not perfect. It has some issues. We raised enhancement requests with Oracle, hopefully, Oracle will resolve them soon.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Tungsten Automation formerly Kofax
    Kofax [Capture] meets our needs and for the most part is easy to use and setup. Configuration could be a little bit easier. The scripting language is a double edge sword if you will. It gives you nearly unlimited possibilities to script what you need, but the downside is you have to script it. Does a good job at batching and scanning documents. The tool integrates well into our workflow which makes our business partners happy and in turn provides for happy customers.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Oracle
    • It provided one single repository with a URL link to access each AP invoice.
    • It gives a life cycle to each invoice where a business user can perform some additional indexing as per their needs.
    • It also provides a reporting feature and a front-end for users to view invoices with ease and very helpful for auditing purpose.
    • It uses the BPEL engine to customize the life cycle and also it can automate the auto entry of supplier invoices in your EBS system.
    • Reduce a lot of manual efforts, manual errors and workforce.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Tungsten Automation formerly Kofax
    • The VRS application included with Kofax Capture is the best image pre-processing platform available on the market today. It can handle a wide array of common document problems such as skew, flipping, wrinkles, lines, and dots.
    • The platform is incredibly scriptable and can be customized to handle all sorts of unusual document contents to allow information to be extracted that many other platforms just struggle on. Table extraction, line item matching, and smart extraction are all strong points with this platform.
    • Through the use of SBL and .NET the platform can be expanded and scaled quite easily to allow for the software to be integrated into existing business processes and platforms with ease.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Oracle
    • Some functionality you would expect to be built-in (such as reporting for compliance) is not and requires other Oracle products to be integrated.
    • Separating an invoice with multiple lines for different departments is not an easy task.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Tungsten Automation formerly Kofax
    • We struggled with configuring Kofax with AP Automation. We used to receive vouchers in different formats by different companies, by different departments. The people from different departments used to scan those vouchers through regular scanners to a central location, which ended up as image pdfs. We fed these image pdfs through Kofax Capture for character recognition, which was painful as the accuracy of recognition was 50 to 60%.
    • Having a connectors with a workflow tool would be helpful where people can validate and approve the output.
    • More samples and documentation related to use of API in .NET applications would be a good improvement, that would help users to adapt the product easily into their organization.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    Oracle
    The challenges with converting to a completely new system create quite a barrier to switching to anything else. If we find another system that offers guaranteed improvements to the user interface -- as well as as a more coherent set of options for data interchanges with current and future enterprise data sources -- we would be more interested in swithing to that new product. Of course, the expense in purchasing competitor system, along with the costs of migrating all current content, along with retooling all existing workflows in place, would be carefully weighed against the benefits incurred from a switch-over.
    Read full review
    Tungsten Automation formerly Kofax
    Cost of Kofax is high, however the cost to benefit scenarios always pay off.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    Oracle
    It meets all required functionality requirements -- but handles none of them in an exceptional manner
    Read full review
    Tungsten Automation formerly Kofax
    It's good.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    Oracle
    No answers on this topic
    Tungsten Automation formerly Kofax
    Haven't really used their support yet
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Oracle
    I can't really provide an answer for this question because I think the basic premise is flawed. Which system an organization selects is based (or should be based) on their unique business and organizational requirements, not the features of the system. We do not recommend a particular solution to a client based on subjective preference for one system over another but rather for its appropriateness to achieve a particular goal or collection of goals.
    Read full review
    Tungsten Automation formerly Kofax
    Kofax Capture is much costlier with compared to other competitive applications but is also provides many more features than other applications.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Oracle
    • We were looking for a scalable solution for invoice processing needs. WebCenter did fit the bill. It reduced manual data entry effort by 80%.
    • WebCenter saved our storage costs. We do not need to store the physical paper copies anymore in our expensive offices.
    • WebCenter increased the employee engagement and reduced monotonous data entry work. Employees now have time to spend on value-added work rather than data entry.
    • Auditors were happy with the tool, as they can retrieve any document with the click of a button as opposed to search and find a physical document.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Tungsten Automation formerly Kofax
    • We were able to decrease personnel expenditures as there was not a need for individuals to index documents prior to incorporating them into the record.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots