Paper.li is an automated content marketing solution that uses automated workflows to crawl millions of sites worldwide to collect content and produce automated products like newsletters.
N/A
Scoop.it Content Director
Score9.9 out of 10
Small Businesses (1-50 employees)
Scoop.it Content Director is the SMB-focused solution for Lean Content Marketing.
It allows Content Marketers to:
- Save time by finding quality content from across the web
- Scale content output without the need for more resources
- Delivers ROI; more quality content means more leads
Chew Chief in Social Media at Meridian Health Plan (Hospital & Health Care, 1-10 employees)
Chose Scoop.it Content Director
We used both social sites and as a personal preference, I liked Scoop.it considerably more because of the layout of the site and the ease of the user experience. It was also much easier to share content. I like to think of Scoop.it as the "short, sweet and to the point" website …
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Key User Insights
Would buy again
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Delivers good value for the price
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Happy with the feature set
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Lived up to sales and marketing promises
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Implementation went as expected
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Features
Paper.li
Scoop.it Content Director
Content Creation
Comparison of Content Creation features of Paper.li and Scoop.it Content Director
Feature
Paper.li
10.0
1 Ratings
25% above category average
Scoop.it Content Director
-
Ratings
Ideation
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Content Publishing
Comparison of Content Publishing features of Paper.li and Scoop.it Content Director
Feature
Paper.li
8.6
1 Ratings
10% above category average
Scoop.it Content Director
-
Ratings
Content hub
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Embedded CTAs
4.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Content distribution
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Content promotion
9.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Content automation
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Content Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Content Reporting & Analytics features of Paper.li and Scoop.it Content Director
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Scoop.it does have collaboration features so you can have more than one admin add content to a topic, but there is no platform for collaboration or drafting of content. It is easy to try out the free version and get a good idea of what the application does, and then add on features from there
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Adds visibility to your account - set the criteria up and have the ejournal run automatically sending out tweets daily that tag other industry handles and hashtags. By doing so you will keep your account active with minimal time investment.
Pose as a thought leader by sharing relevant content and industry news and get more Twitter followers
Get free traffic to your pages by expanding on your company or service in the bio section and linking back
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
When we first implemented the usage of Scoop.it the topics of search were very limited, but as the popularity grows, so does the number of searchable topics.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
We used both social sites and as a personal preference, I liked Scoop.it considerably more because of the layout of the site and the ease of the user experience. It was also much easier to share content. I like to think of Scoop.it as the "short, sweet and to the point" website that gives me exactly what we need, when we need it and the manner in which it easiest to use.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
