Plone is a free and open source content management system built on top of the Zope application server. Plone can be used for any kind of website, including blogs, internet sites, webshops, and internal websites.
N/A
Unit4 Financials by Coda
Score5.1 out of 10
N/A
Unit4 Financials by Coda is presented as a no-compromise, dedicated, standalone financial management software that supports financial accounting, procurement, billing and asset management.
N/A
Pricing
Plone
Unit4 Financials by Coda
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Plone
Unit4 Financials by Coda
Free Trial
No
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Features
Plone
Unit4 Financials by Coda
Security
Comparison of Security features of Plone and Unit4 Financials by Coda
Feature
Plone
10.0
5 Ratings
19% above category average
Unit4 Financials by Coda
9.0
1 Ratings
10% above category average
Role-based user permissions
10.05 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Single sign-on capability
00 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Platform & Infrastructure
Comparison of Platform & Infrastructure features of Plone and Unit4 Financials by Coda
Feature
Plone
10.0
5 Ratings
25% above category average
Unit4 Financials by Coda
-
Ratings
API
10.05 Ratings
00 Ratings
Internationalization / multi-language
10.05 Ratings
00 Ratings
Web Content Creation
Comparison of Web Content Creation features of Plone and Unit4 Financials by Coda
Feature
Plone
9.4
6 Ratings
18% above category average
Unit4 Financials by Coda
-
Ratings
WYSIWYG editor
10.06 Ratings
00 Ratings
Code quality / cleanliness
10.05 Ratings
00 Ratings
Admin section
10.05 Ratings
00 Ratings
Page templates
10.05 Ratings
00 Ratings
Library of website themes
5.05 Ratings
00 Ratings
Mobile optimization / responsive design
10.05 Ratings
00 Ratings
Publishing workflow
10.05 Ratings
00 Ratings
Form generator
10.05 Ratings
00 Ratings
Web Content Management
Comparison of Web Content Management features of Plone and Unit4 Financials by Coda
Feature
Plone
9.4
5 Ratings
22% above category average
Unit4 Financials by Coda
-
Ratings
Content taxonomy
10.05 Ratings
00 Ratings
SEO support
10.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
Bulk management
10.05 Ratings
00 Ratings
Availability / breadth of extensions
8.05 Ratings
00 Ratings
Community / comment management
9.05 Ratings
00 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Plone and Unit4 Financials by Coda
Feature
Plone
-
Ratings
Unit4 Financials by Coda
5.3
1 Ratings
38% below category average
Dashboards
00 Ratings
1.01 Ratings
Standard reports
00 Ratings
7.01 Ratings
Custom reports
00 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
General Ledger and Configurable Accounting
Comparison of General Ledger and Configurable Accounting features of Plone and Unit4 Financials by Coda
Feature
Plone
-
Ratings
Unit4 Financials by Coda
8.1
1 Ratings
6% above category average
Accounts payable
00 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Accounts receivable
00 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Cash management
00 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Expense management
00 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Multi-division support
00 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Intercompany Accounting
00 Ratings
7.01 Ratings
Journals and Reconciliations
00 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Standardized Processes
00 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Inventory Management
Comparison of Inventory Management features of Plone and Unit4 Financials by Coda
The larger your organization, the more appropriate Plone will be. This is not to say that Plone is a worse choice for small websites, only that the minimum investment for a Plone site is certainly higher than for other platforms. If you already use Plone for your site and are looking for a redesign or an overhaul, I would only advise switching to a different platform such as WordPress or Drupal if your organization is downsizing. For any other situation, Plone is the natural choice for your growth.
This would work well for the back side of accounting...meaning after the invoice was created. If you need software to create invoices, this may not be the software for you (or at least you would have to do additional research on its capability). Other than that, it takes care of the majority of our needs.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Plone is a folder-based system, organising content in a similar way desktop-users are doing for the last two decades. No need to teach non-tech customers some relational-database like paradigm for content management.
Plone is secure. It is the most secure CMS you can get your hands on.
Plone is flexible, and makes fast development easy.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Not everything is configurable or editable by Plone, and when you need to adjust or add custom pieces in, you need to deal with Zope. Zope has an ugly, confusing and difficult UI and structure as a backend.
Using 3rd party products is difficult to do - there are a few different ways to get them installed, all of which take a bit of luck to get right.
Building custom products for Plone is not fun. You've got to deal with an archaic framework to tie in that is not well documented (there is documentation about many things, but not great documentation and there are a lot of holes in the documentation).
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Compared to the amount of Plone sites, users and customizations we have in our organization, the amount of support requests and training needed is really small.
The new user interface in Plone 6 is even better, it is super fast, has lots of different blocks for enhancing the page, has flexible layout system and is easy to extend with more features.
Our Plone sites are very robust. We have critical systems on Plone and we have been running sites on Plone for over 20 years with very little unexpected downtime.
Plone is very intensive in its operations, and if not configured well it can be slow. However it is designed and built with speed in mind and with proper use of coding, templates and caching can perform extremely well under high loads. It is capable of scaling to very high load availability environments with no specific coding requirements.
Drupal: Plone is cheaper, so with Drupal is more complex to reach the required ROI. However, Drupal has a lower learning curve WordPress: For our necessities it has a more expensive learning curve than plone. Joomla, is easier to use. However, it have some issues on security and web content where Plone is much better
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Unit4 Financials is definitely much more robust than Peachtree or other software. I've also used SAP in the past and this seems to have many more capabilities.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
The impact Plone has had at the University of Oshkosh is as follows: this software allows student workers to learn about IT departments and CMS's in a user-friendly way. It gives many students great jobs that look great on their resumes.
Since there are great training manuals for Plone, there is increased employee efficient in the workplace. Training doesn't take long, and if there's ever a question, the Plone manual is a great tool to refer to.
If an employee using Plone quits, its easy to find someone to replace them with quick training and great resources.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info