TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

PractiTest vs. TestMu AI (Formerly LambdaTest)

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    PractiTest

    Score8 out of 10
    N/APractiTest is presented as a cloud-based test management tool that provides its customers with an end-to-end system to meet testing and QA needs. It is described by the vendor as flexible but methodological, enabling organizations to ensure visibility and communication at all levels. The solution aims to help users and project development teams streamline and manage their testing processes, while providing management with a clear and simple view of their project status at all times.

    $39

    user

    TestMu AI (Formerly LambdaTest)

    Score8.9 out of 10
    Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
    TestMu AI (formerly LambdaTest) is a full-stack, AI-native quality engineering platform that lets teams plan, author, execute and analyse software quality in one place, across web, mobile and AI applications. Performance and load testing: TestMu AI runs JMeter .jmx plans and Gatling simulations unchanged, at protocol level, on managed cloud load generators that are provisioned for each run across six regions and removed when it ends, so there is no load…

    $19

    per month per user

    Pricing
    PractiTestTestMu AI (Formerly LambdaTest)
    Editions & Modules
    Professional
    $39.00
    user
    Enterprise
    $49.00
    user
    Virtual Live
    $19
    per month Parallel Test
    Real Device Plus Live
    $49
    per month 1 parallel test
    Test Manager
    $59
    per month per seat
    Web Automation on Desktop
    $99
    per month Parallel Test
    Virtual Automation Cloud
    $159
    per month Parallel Test
    HyperExecute Cloud (Multi OS)
    $199
    per month Parallel Test
    Real Device + Automation Cloud
    $249
    per month Parallel Test
    SmartUI Visual Regression
    $269
    per month Parallel Test
    Kane AI (Mobile + Web)
    $349
    per month Parallel Test
    Enterprise
    Custom Pricing
    Parallel Test
    HyperExecute On-Premise
    Custom Pricing
    per parallel test
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    PractiTestTestMu AI (Formerly LambdaTest)
    Free Trial
    YesYes
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoYes
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeOptionalNo setup fee
    Additional Details—Discount available for annual pricing.
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    PractiTestTestMu AI (Formerly LambdaTest)
    Considered Both Products
    PractiTest
    No answer on this topic
    TestMu AI
    No answer on this topic
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    No answers on this topic
    98%
    Would buy again
    105 Answers
    Delivers good value for the price
    No answers on this topic
    98%
    Delivers good value for the price
    99 Answers
    Happy with the feature set
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Happy with the feature set
    107 Answers
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    97%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    75 Answers
    Implementation went as expected
    No answers on this topic
    97%
    Implementation went as expected
    89 Answers
    Features
    PractiTestTestMu AI (Formerly LambdaTest)
    Test Management
    Comparison of Test Management features of PractiTest and TestMu AI (Formerly LambdaTest)
    Feature
    PractiTest
    8.5
    4 Ratings
    5% above category average
    TestMu AI (Formerly LambdaTest)
    -
    Ratings
    Centralized test management9.24 Ratings00 Ratings
    Map tests to user stories8.44 Ratings00 Ratings
    Test execution reporting8.44 Ratings00 Ratings
    Defect management8.03 Ratings00 Ratings
    User Ratings
    PractiTestTestMu AI (Formerly LambdaTest)
    Likelihood to Recommend
    8.7
    (4 ratings)
    9.0
    (118 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.7
    (7 ratings)
    Usability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.1
    (70 ratings)
    Availability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    Performance
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    Support Rating
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    10.0
    (7 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.0
    (2 ratings)
    Configurability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    Contract Terms and Pricing Model
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    Ease of integration
    -
    (0 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    Product Scalability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    Vendor post-sale
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    Vendor pre-sale
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    PractiTestTestMu AI (Formerly LambdaTest)
    Likelihood to Recommend
    PractiTest
    PractiTest works GREAT as a test case repository. It is very easy to gather metrics, filter, and sort based on custom fields. We were able to work with the API to pull our automation results in as well. The support team is always very quick with their responses and monitors the "in-app chat." They are very open to answering questions, providing best practice materials, and looking for additional feedback. If you already have a central location for all of your test cases and testing needs, then I guess you probably wouldn't need to add another. However, PractiTest has high capability and potential, so if it's set up properly you can easily save time managing your tests.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    TestMu AI
    One day, I needed to test a specific issue that was occurring only on Pixel phones. I turned to LambdaTest, quickly identified the problem, and was able to fix it. There hasn't been a situation where I felt LambdaTest didn't help, it's my go-to solution for testing, as it solves many problems.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    PractiTest
    • Effective Test case template.
    • Can integrate with different Atlassian products.
    • Report generation.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    TestMu AI
    • Very accessible as multiple users can be added in each subscription
    • Very reliable as it is very close to the actual device when it comes to operating system and version behavior
    • There are a lot of options for devices and browsers that users can choose from when it comes to emulating and testing
    Read full review
    Cons
    PractiTest
    • Linking the defect with Jira throws an error quite some times which can be improved in the future.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    TestMu AI
    • More real devices should be added like I have Samsung mobile but it was not in the list
    • It takes time in checking the link on LambdaTest if we compare with real mobiles
    • Sometimes exact results are not matching as from real mobiles
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    PractiTest
    No answers on this topic
    TestMu AI
    The reason i have given the 10 points becasue the problem LambdaTest solves is providing access to all devices in one place, allowing developers to identify the same errors they would encounter on real devices. This makes life much easier, especially for developers who regularly face cross-device functionality issues. It's a big plus point that positions LambdaTest as an all-in-one solution.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    PractiTest
    No answers on this topic
    TestMu AI
    Because of the ease of use of the platform, we just save a lot of time and effort with this as its a feature rich solution, we just need to upload app binary once and for everytime we need to test on a different device we can just directly install that binary on the device without the pain of reupload.
    Read full review
    Reliability and Availability
    PractiTest
    No answers on this topic
    TestMu AI
    yes always available
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Performance
    PractiTest
    No answers on this topic
    TestMu AI
    haven't found any glitch while using this
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    PractiTest
    The chat button is available to anyone who logs into PractiTest. In my experience, the support has always been very quick, very friendly, and very thorough. They make sure that your question is answered in a way that you understand it. They also provide documentation of best practices so you are never left hanging on what to do next.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    TestMu AI
    The customer support team is very active and cooperative. Once, I contacted them in their off timings because of an issue, I got an instant reply from the executive and he resolved the issue very efficiently. This is why we have been using LambdaTest for more than two years. It is best suited for us.
    Read full review
    Implementation Rating
    PractiTest
    No answers on this topic
    TestMu AI
    Implementation of Lambdatest was very easy for different project requirements.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    PractiTest
    I've used many different Test Case Repository tools, and while each of them has its perks, I like the capabilities of PractiTest best. When creating a test in qTest for example, you can only input information into the fields provided, and you have everything set up in a folder tree structure. With PractiTest, we are able to create custom fields and filter our tests based on those fields to provide more accurate information in a readily available format while quickly searching for the filter instead of through a folder tree. TestRail did not appear to meet our needs as a company. It just didn't have the potential that we found with PractiTest. Zephyr for example worked seamlessly with Jira, which is really nice since that is what we use for the most part. However since we cater to many different clients, we needed an external Test Case repository so we could use something that wasn't tied to 1 Jira instance.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    TestMu AI
    While BrowserStack is also a well-established platform, we found LambdaTest to offer similar and even better features at reasonable pricing. LambdaTest is more cost-effective than BrowserStack. LambdaTest provides a free forever plan, while BrowserStack does not. Even manual testing plans are better priced than BrowserStack’s. In terms of UI and onboarding, we found LambdaTest more user-friendly as well.
    Read full review
    Scalability
    PractiTest
    No answers on this topic
    TestMu AI
    not all department, but we're using for our clients
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    PractiTest
    • Test Reporting
    • Defect Management
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    TestMu AI
    • Automation testing has a bit of a learning curve
    • Lack of real device keep that bug in your head if not on the website.
    • Need to wait for a while for a new OS or browser version on the contrary of immediate availability in case of owning a lab
    Read full review
    ScreenShots

    PractiTest Screenshots

    Product screenshotProduct screenshotProduct screenshotProduct screenshot

    TestMu AI (Formerly LambdaTest) Screenshots

    Screenshot of An automated screenshot.Screenshot of Mobile-browser-testingScreenshot of Automation testing on LambdatestScreenshot of Some of the available integrations.Screenshot of Real-time testingScreenshot of Responsive testing