Proofpoint Threat Response Auto-Pull vs. Runframe

Proofpoint Threat Response Auto-Pull

Runframe

Overview
Product	Rating	Most Used By	Product Summary	Starting Price
Proofpoint Threat Response Auto-Pull	Score 8.0 out of 10	N/A	Proofpoint Threat Response Auto-Pull (TRAP) enables messaging and security administrators to automatically retract threats delivered to employee inboxes and emails that turn malicious after delivery to quarantine. It is also a powerful solution to retract messages sent in error as well as inappropriate, malicious, or emails containing compliance violations and also follows forwarded mail and distribution lists and creates an audit-able activity trail. With Proofpoint Threat Response…	N/A
Runframe	Score 0.0 out of 10	N/A	Runframe is an incident management, on-call scheduling, and status page platform built for engineering teams at seed-to-Series C companies. It operates natively inside Slack, allowing teams to declare, manage, and resolve incidents without switching tools. Incident Management: Teams declare incidents with a single Slack command. Runframe automatically creates a dedicated channel, assigns responders based on severity, and tracks every status change in a…	N/A

Pricing

Proofpoint Threat Response Auto-Pull

Runframe

Editions & Modules

No answers on this topic

Offerings

Pricing Offerings
Proofpoint Threat Response Auto-Pull	Runframe
Free Trial
Yes	Yes
Free/Freemium Version
No	No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No	No

Entry-level Setup Fee

No setup fee

Additional Details

—

More Pricing Information

Community Pulse
	Proofpoint Threat Response Auto-Pull	Runframe
Considered Both Products	Proofpoint Threat Response Auto-Pull Chris Bash IS Systems Analyst Chose Proofpoint Threat Response Auto-Pull TRAP had fewer false positives and caught more malicious emails. With the host of companion products, it was more complete package. It gives us the ability to pull emails using an admin-submitted CVS file of emails to pull. EOP does not have this capability. Incentivized Helpful? Fraser Clark Network Engineer Chose Proofpoint Threat Response Auto-Pull I have not evaluated any other products against TRAP. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Proofpoint Threat Response Auto-Pull I have never evaluated TRAP against another product. Incentivized Helpful?	Runframe No answer on this topic

Features

Proofpoint Threat Response Auto-Pull

Runframe

Incident Response Platforms

Comparison of Incident Response Platforms features of Product A and Product B
	Proofpoint Threat Response Auto-Pull 8.4 Ratings 6% below category average	Runframe - Ratings
Integration with Other Security Systems	9.00 Ratings	00 Ratings
Attack Chain Visualization	8.00 Ratings	00 Ratings
Centralized Dashboard	6.00 Ratings	00 Ratings
Machine Learning to Prevent Incidents	9.00 Ratings	00 Ratings
Live Response for Rapid Remediation	10.00 Ratings	00 Ratings

Best Alternatives
	Proofpoint Threat Response Auto-Pull	Runframe
Small Businesses	ThreatDown, powered by Malwarebytes Score 9.5 out of 10	ThreatDown, powered by Malwarebytes Score 9.5 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies	CrowdStrike Falcon Score 9.0 out of 10	CrowdStrike Falcon Score 9.0 out of 10
Enterprises	CrowdStrike Falcon Score 9.0 out of 10	CrowdStrike Falcon Score 9.0 out of 10
All Alternatives	View all alternatives	View all alternatives

User Ratings
	Proofpoint Threat Response Auto-Pull	Runframe
Likelihood to Recommend	9.0 (0 ratings)	- (0 ratings)
Usability	9.0 (0 ratings)	- (0 ratings)
Support Rating	9.0 (0 ratings)	- (0 ratings)

User Testimonials
	Proofpoint Threat Response Auto-Pull	Runframe
Likelihood to Recommend	It is very well suited for any organization, though the pricing is more for larger organizations. Having auto pull available means you have fewer worries that phishing emails end up in users' mailboxes. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	No answers on this topic
Pros	Finds malicious messages in users mailboxes that were not previously detected. Gives good data about messages post-detection. Integrates with AD. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	No answers on this topic
Cons	Would like an Azure virtual machine version of it. Currently, it's only supported on VMware and AWS. Configuring authentication certificates on it is not easy. It does not work with RSASSA-PSS signed certificates. Incentivized Chris Bash IS Systems Analyst Read full review	No answers on this topic
Usability	It's easy to use and requires very little administrator hands on. Incentivized Chris Bash IS Systems Analyst Read full review	No answers on this topic
Support Rating	They are quick to respond and have talented support personnel. Incentivized Chris Bash IS Systems Analyst Read full review	No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered	TRAP had fewer false positives and caught more malicious emails. With the host of companion products, it was more complete package. It gives us the ability to pull emails using an admin-submitted CVS file of emails to pull. EOP does not have this capability. Incentivized Chris Bash IS Systems Analyst Read full review	No answers on this topic
Return on Investment	Helped mitigate the email portion of our penetration test entirely. Made us aware of the amount of suspicious emails being delivered. Prevented malware spreading through mail. Incentivized Fraser Clark Network Engineer Read full review	No answers on this topic
ScreenShots		Runframe Screenshots