QuestDB vs. Redis Software

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
QuestDB
Scoreย 10.0ย outย ofย 10
N/A
QuestDB is an open source time series database. It implements SQL and exposes a Postgres wire protocol, a REST API, and supports ingestion with InfluxDB line protocol.N/A
Redis Software
Scoreย 8.9ย outย ofย 10
N/A
Redis is an open source in-memory data structure server and NoSQL database.N/A
Pricing
QuestDBRedis Software
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
QuestDBRedis Software
Free Trial
YesYes
Free/Freemium Version
YesYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoYes
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeOptional
Additional Detailsโ€”โ€”
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
QuestDBRedis Software
Features
QuestDBRedis Software
NoSQL Databases
Comparison of NoSQL Databases features of Product A and Product B
QuestDB
-
Ratings
Redis Software
8.6
70 Ratings
3% below category average
Performance00 Ratings9.070 Ratings
Availability00 Ratings7.070 Ratings
Concurrency00 Ratings9.069 Ratings
Security00 Ratings8.064 Ratings
Scalability00 Ratings9.070 Ratings
Data model flexibility00 Ratings9.063 Ratings
Deployment model flexibility00 Ratings9.063 Ratings
Best Alternatives
QuestDBRedis Software
Small Businesses
InfluxDB
InfluxDB
Scoreย 8.8ย outย ofย 10
IBM Cloudant
IBM Cloudant
Scoreย 7.6ย outย ofย 10
Medium-sized Companies

No answers on this topic

IBM Cloudant
IBM Cloudant
Scoreย 7.6ย outย ofย 10
Enterprises

No answers on this topic

IBM Cloudant
IBM Cloudant
Scoreย 7.6ย outย ofย 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
QuestDBRedis Software
Likelihood to Recommend
10.0
(1 ratings)
8.0
(77 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
8.7
(12 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(6 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
8.7
(5 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
7.3
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
QuestDBRedis Software
Likelihood to Recommend
QuestDB
QuestDB is well suited for any use case where you need to store large amount of data and the performance is the key factor - for both reads and writes. So use cases like market data storage in financial industry, any kind of telemetry, etc.
Read full review
Redis
Redis has been a great investment for our organization as we needed a solution for high speed data caching. The ramp up and integration was quite easy. Redis handles automatic failover internally, so no crashes provides high availability. On the fly scaling scale to more/less cores and memory as and when needed.
Read full review
Pros
QuestDB
  • Extreme performance.
  • Super easy to use.
  • Compatibility with Influx line protocol.
  • PostgreSQL compatibility.
  • Out of order timestamps.
  • Support for multiple records with same timestamp.
  • Integration with Grafana.
  • Team responsiveness.
Read full review
Redis
  • Easy for developers to understand. Unlike Riak, which I've used in the past, it's fast without having to worry about eventual consistency.
  • Reliable. With a proper multi-node configuration, it can handle failover instantly.
  • Configurable. We primarily still use Memcache for caching but one of the teams uses Redis for both long-term storage and temporary expiry keys without taking on another external dependency.
  • Fast. We process tens of thousands of RPS and it doesn't skip a beat.
Read full review
Cons
QuestDB
  • New project so needs a bit polishing.
Read full review
Redis
  • We had some difficulty scaling Redis without it becoming prohibitively expensive.
  • Redis has very simple search capabilities, which means its not suitable for all use cases.
  • Redis doesn't have good native support for storing data in object form and many libraries built over it return data as a string, meaning you need build your own serialization layer over it.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
QuestDB
No answers on this topic
Redis
We will definitely continue using Redis because: 1. It is free and open source. 2. We already use it in so many applications, it will be hard for us to let go. 3. There isn't another competitive product that we know of that gives a better performance. 4. We never had any major issues with Redis, so no point turning our backs.
Read full review
Usability
QuestDB
No answers on this topic
Redis
It is quite simple to set up for the purpose of managing user sessions in the backend. It can be easily integrated with other products or technologies, such as Spring in Java. If you need to actually display the data stored in Redis in your application this is a bit difficult to understand initially but is possible.
Read full review
Support Rating
QuestDB
No answers on this topic
Redis
The support team has always been excellent in handling our mostly questions, rarely problems. They are responsive, find the solution and get us moving forward again. I have never had to escalate a case with them. They have always solved our problems in a very timely manner. I highly commend the support team.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
QuestDB
No answers on this topic
Redis
Whitelisting of the AWS lambda functions.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
QuestDB
We were looking for time series database that will be able to handle L2 market data and came across QuestDB. From the beginning we were impressed how well the QuestDB performs and that it actually significantly outperforms all other open source TSDB on market like InfluxDB, ClickHouse, Timescale, etc. Apart from the excellent performance it is also super easy to use and deploy which makes the experience of using the database very pleasant - we were able to be up and running and storing data within few hours. Topic itself is the QuestDB team that is super responsive on their slack channel and always ready to help with any query. They are constantly improving the product and if there is some missing feature that is blocking you from usage they always try the best to implement such feature asap and release a new version - one of the best support I have ever seen so far in open source community.
Read full review
Redis
We are big users of MySQL and PostgreSQL. We were looking at replacing our aging web page caching technology and found that we could do it in SQL, but there was a NoSQL movement happening at the time. We dabbled a bit in the NoSQL scene just to get an idea of what it was about and whether it was for us. We tried a bunch, but I can only seem to remember Mongo and Couch. Mongo had big issues early on that drove us to Redis and we couldn't quite figure out how to deploy couch.
Read full review
Return on Investment
QuestDB
  • Reduced cost.
  • Increased efficiency.
  • Faster time to market.
Read full review
Redis
  • Redis has helped us increase our throughput and server data to a growing amount of traffic while keeping our app fast. We couldn't have grown without the ability to easily cache data that Redis provides.
  • Redis has helped us decrease the load on our database. By being able to scale up and cache important data, we reduce the load on our database reducing costs and infra issues.
  • Running a Redis node on something like AWS can be costly, but it is often a requirement for scaling a company. If you need data quickly and your business is already a positive ROI, Redis is worth the investment.
Read full review
ScreenShots

QuestDB Screenshots

Screenshot of Fast SQL for time seriesScreenshot of Console to query and visualize dataF

Redis Software Screenshots

Screenshot of Database configurationScreenshot of Database metricsScreenshot of DatabasesScreenshot of NodesScreenshot of Alerts